Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: America's Truly Finest city is...
San Diego 115 60.21%
Seattle 76 39.79%
Voters: 191. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2020, 10:20 PM
 
8,890 posts, read 6,920,122 times
Reputation: 8719

Advertisements

We can't build enough to bring prices down (aside from temporary overbuilding), but the City could change legislation to make it happen.

Prices in a growing city generally reflect development cost. Development doesn't happen unless prices are high enough, including a profit attractive enough to draw investors.

But development costs are way higher than they need to be. Seattle's land use codes (height, massing, etc.) limit development capacity, so any capacity (land) is very expensive. On top of that we charge millions in fees per project. Then there's a long entitlement process. We've eased the laws in some areas, but added more fees to offset that. The best thing we do is not requiring parking in many areas, and limiting what's required in many others.

Upzone more land, omit some fees, and streamline the process...it would be easy to knock maybe 10-15% of the cost of new housing (top of my head) and therefore existing housing too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-09-2020, 09:54 AM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,731,345 times
Reputation: 7557
Neither.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2020, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,099 posts, read 14,507,739 times
Reputation: 11327
In this choice, San Diego by a mile.

The San Diego weather just destroys Seattle. That alone is worth San Diego winning.

Comparison between Seattle being pretty overcast, drizzly/rainy and cooler, to San Diego being sunny and mild with a Mediterranean climate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2020, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Oakland
765 posts, read 901,295 times
Reputation: 765
Can't go wrong with either. I might give San Diego the edge for weather and being slightly more affordable. If you can't afford Seattle at least there are some surrounding cities that are pretty cool with a lower cost of living. (Tacoma, Edmonds, Olympia)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2020, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,372,068 times
Reputation: 13299
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Seattle is still growing quickly, and it's not just people making six figures. It's often younger people with no kids/car/debt. Those people can survive with roommates on $40k, live fine on $60k, and live well for $90k.
That's not impressive by any metric in my opinion. In order to live there comfortably, you basically have to be in a minority group. I don't make $50k. I'm not trying to single out Seattle though, it's an American problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2020, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Mequon, WI
8,296 posts, read 23,146,424 times
Reputation: 5700
When I think of Seattle I think of homeless people, rain and people jumping off bridges due to depression, When I think of San Diego I think of beaches, oceans and golf, so SD it is for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2020, 10:23 PM
 
8,890 posts, read 6,920,122 times
Reputation: 8719
Quote:
Originally Posted by annie_himself View Post
That's not impressive by any metric in my opinion. In order to live there comfortably, you basically have to be in a minority group. I don't make $50k. I'm not trying to single out Seattle though, it's an American problem.
As OyCrumbler pointed out, the median household in Seattle made $93k at last count, and without knowing what year it refers to I'll guess it was up by thousands since then. Let's say $95k. $50k is way below median, and even farther below average.

To be fair, my references to $40/60/90k was referring to single people without debt/kids/car. A lot of families are on the edge or worse, including some above the median. But our housing prices are high because there's demand, even beyond our 8,500/year average net additional housing units. Prices go to the "pain point," which is called that for good reason of course.

Some context, not specifically helping anyone's points: Jobs that pay $50k in some cities will pay $60k in Seattle because that's how they can get people. But also, that sort of job will gravitate to other cities, not here. What gravitates to the city of Seattle and the core Eastside (our two main office submarkets) is the $120k+ software job, and even that is generally taken by people without kids due to our housing prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2020, 07:06 AM
sub
 
Location: ^##
4,963 posts, read 3,781,956 times
Reputation: 7831
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Uncommon_ View Post
Not to sneer, but 40k isn’t a lot of money. In the 90s and early 2000s, you could definitely live comfortably on that but today, you almost certainly need a spouse or roommate to make ends meet in most cities.
No it's not a lot of money, even here in the middle, but people who make 40k in Seattle can probably make 40k just about anywhere doing something similar if not the same. At which point the novelty of living on the coast makes much less sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2020, 09:00 AM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,613 posts, read 24,152,679 times
Reputation: 24062
I’d pick San Diego.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2020, 09:05 AM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,731,345 times
Reputation: 7557
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy1953 View Post
Neither. The question is ridiculous in assuming the two are the best candidates. One of the worst thread questions I have seen on CD.
Agreed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top