Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-10-2022, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,274 posts, read 14,742,883 times
Reputation: 11614

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
Oakland. Looks more dense. San Diego or Cleveland?
San Diego for me--much more dense and compact, about twice the buildings as Cleveland. Cleveland has a couple of nice skyscrapers though, over 700 feet. But Cleveland needs a good 10-15 more to be where they should for their history and size.

Here are 2 good matchups, I think--

Minneapolis, MN or Denver, CO?
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2022, 03:25 PM
 
1,526 posts, read 2,007,965 times
Reputation: 1529
Minneapolis is a couple spots above Denver



St. Paul or Tampa
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2022, 04:07 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,274 posts, read 14,742,883 times
Reputation: 11614
Quote:
Originally Posted by YIMBY View Post
Minneapolis is a couple spots above Denver



St. Paul or Tampa
Tampa all the way. Much more potential and growing their skyline, finally.

A couple of east vs west cities here--

Seattle or Atlanta?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2022, 08:59 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,783 posts, read 9,628,825 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Tampa all the way. Much more potential and growing their skyline, finally.

A couple of east vs west cities here--

Seattle or Atlanta?
Atlanta due to their multiple skylines making for a dramatic effect.

Nashville, TN or Pittsburgh, PA?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2022, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,274 posts, read 14,742,883 times
Reputation: 11614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Atlanta due to their multiple skylines making for a dramatic effect.

Nashville, TN or Pittsburgh, PA?
Well, as of 2022, Pittsburgh wins this match-up.

Pittsburgh has a beautiful skyline with great density, great height, and just really nice architecture with its buildings overall. It's one of my favorite skylines in the country.

Nashville needs some height, and they will get it with the 750 foot planned Giarattana YMCA Tower, hopefully to be finished in 2024/early 2025. This will push the skyline up, and will really make it become one of the better ones overall in the US for me, too. Right now, its density is booming and skyscrapers in the 300-500-ish range are springing up everywhere.

But Pittsburgh still wins, due to its height, density and aesthetics.

Pittsburgh, PA or Boston, MA?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2022, 03:16 PM
 
Location: SLC > DC
503 posts, read 809,825 times
Reputation: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Well, as of 2022, Pittsburgh wins this match-up.

Pittsburgh has a beautiful skyline with great density, great height, and just really nice architecture with its buildings overall. It's one of my favorite skylines in the country.

Nashville needs some height, and they will get it with the 750 foot planned Giarattana YMCA Tower, hopefully to be finished in 2024/early 2025. This will push the skyline up, and will really make it become one of the better ones overall in the US for me, too. Right now, its density is booming and skyscrapers in the 300-500-ish range are springing up everywhere.

But Pittsburgh still wins, due to its height, density and aesthetics.

Pittsburgh, PA or Boston, MA?
Pittsburgh is more unique but Boston’s is much larger so Boston for me

Minneapolis or Philadelphia

Last edited by Gfitz1010; 02-11-2022 at 03:40 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2022, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,783 posts, read 9,628,825 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gfitz1010 View Post
Pittsburgh is more unique but Boston’s is much larger so Boston for me

Minneapolis or Philadelphia
Philadelphia. The city has great density and nice architecture.

Columbus, OH or Oklahoma City, OK?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2022, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,274 posts, read 14,742,883 times
Reputation: 11614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Philadelphia. The city has great density and nice architecture.

Columbus, OH or Oklahoma City, OK?
Definitely Columbus, for me. It has some decent balance and decent height. It needs more density, but looks pretty good overall.

Oklahoma City's Devon Tower is just head-scratching to me. It's a nice tower, super tall and architecturally powerful.

But right now in Oklahoma City's skyline, it is very much out of place. Standing 844 feet tall, the closest tower to that height is the 500 foot tall BancFirst Tower, built in 1971.

And OKC only has 10 skyscrapers over 300 feet, total. It's a super unbalanced skyline, and the skyline needs to fill the gap between the 500 and 844 foot towers. They need at least 2 more to make it look incredible. If one @ 600 ft was added, and then another at 650-700 feet, it would look so much better. Then at the lower height level, another 8-10 are needed between 300-500 feet.

Two very similar cities with one large looming tallest tower: Omaha or Des Moines?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2022, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
4,028 posts, read 2,334,136 times
Reputation: 1854
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Definitely Columbus, for me. It has some decent balance and decent height. It needs more density, but looks pretty good overall.

Oklahoma City's Devon Tower is just head-scratching to me. It's a nice tower, super tall and architecturally powerful.

But right now in Oklahoma City's skyline, it is very much out of place. Standing 844 feet tall, the closest tower to that height is the 500 foot tall BancFirst Tower, built in 1971.

And OKC only has 10 skyscrapers over 300 feet, total. It's a super unbalanced skyline, and the skyline needs to fill the gap between the 500 and 844 foot towers. They need at least 2 more to make it look incredible. If one @ 600 ft was added, and then another at 650-700 feet, it would look so much better. Then at the lower height level, another 8-10 are needed between 300-500 feet.

Two very similar cities with one large looming tallest tower: Omaha or Des Moines?
I'd say Omaha. Looks like it has a couple more taller buildings. Seattle or Boston?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2022, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,783 posts, read 9,628,825 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
I'd say Omaha. Looks like it has a couple more taller buildings. Seattle or Boston?
Seattle for me. I think it has passed Boston. Seattle's skyline has grown nicely. I cannot wait to what it will look like in a few years.

Phoenix, AZ or Charlotte, NC?
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top