Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-02-2022, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
4,034 posts, read 2,342,077 times
Reputation: 1854

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Lexington for height and density.

Baton Rouge, LA or Greensboro, NC?
I prefer Greensboro's. It looks like there's more. Richmond or Raleigh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2022, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,788 posts, read 9,644,430 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
I prefer Greensboro's. It looks like there's more. Richmond or Raleigh?
Raleigh. More modern, better architecture. Raleigh will look completely different by 2030.

Virginia Beach, VA downtown or Springfield, MO downtown?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2022, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,273 posts, read 14,760,933 times
Reputation: 11614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Raleigh. More modern, better architecture. Raleigh will look completely different by 2030.

Virginia Beach, VA downtown or Springfield, MO downtown?
Definitely Virginia Beach. Taller buildings and more dynamic and dense. Springfield's downtown though is cute--but needs more density.

Bridgeport, CT or Chattanooga, TN?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2022, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,788 posts, read 9,644,430 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Definitely Virginia Beach. Taller buildings and more dynamic and dense. Springfield's downtown though is cute--but needs more density.

Bridgeport, CT or Chattanooga, TN?
Close call. Chattanooga wins based on better scenery and dramatic elevation changes. Bridgeport has better architecture, however.

Morgantown, WV or Clarksville, TN?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2022, 07:54 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
4,034 posts, read 2,342,077 times
Reputation: 1854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Close call. Chattanooga wins based on better scenery and dramatic elevation changes. Bridgeport has better architecture, however.

Morgantown, WV or Clarksville, TN?
They're both similar but prefer Clarksville. Fargo ND or Sioux Falls SD?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2022, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,788 posts, read 9,644,430 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
They're both similar but prefer Clarksville. Fargo ND or Sioux Falls SD?
Sioux Falls. I like the depth of the skyline. And how neat is it to have the Big Sioux River snaking its way through the city?

Arlington, TX or Columbia, SC?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2022, 07:27 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
1,607 posts, read 3,446,954 times
Reputation: 2027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Sioux Falls. I like the depth of the skyline. And how neat is it to have the Big Sioux River snaking its way through the city?

Arlington, TX or Columbia, SC?
Columbia by default because Arlington doesn't have a skyline... Unless you consider ATT Stadium a skyline.

Corpus Christi, TX or Lexington, KY
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2022, 07:49 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,273 posts, read 14,760,933 times
Reputation: 11614
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabetx View Post
Columbia by default because Arlington doesn't have a skyline... Unless you consider ATT Stadium a skyline.

Corpus Christi, TX or Lexington, KY
Definitely Corpus Christi. Its skyline is beautiful at times right by the water, and it has more towers than Lexington.

Lexington has a very small, yet slowly growing skyline. I think it has a promising future, but it's small compared to Corpus Christi.

Lexington, KY or Charleston, WV?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2022, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,788 posts, read 9,644,430 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Definitely Corpus Christi. Its skyline is beautiful at times right by the water, and it has more towers than Lexington.

Lexington has a very small, yet slowly growing skyline. I think it has a promising future, but it's small compared to Corpus Christi.

Lexington, KY or Charleston, WV?
Lexington because it is more recognizable and is growing.

Milwaukee, WI or Oakland, CA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2022, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
4,034 posts, read 2,342,077 times
Reputation: 1854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Lexington because it is more recognizable and is growing.

Milwaukee, WI or Oakland, CA?
Oakland. Looks more dense. San Diego or Cleveland?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top