Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One thing is for sure. People do not like suburban in nature cities. Or I should say, people find suburban oriented cities boring which is understanding because actual suburban cities (especially those after post world war 2) are boring in itself.
One thing is for sure. People do not like suburban in nature cities. Or I should say, people find suburban oriented cities boring which is understanding because actual suburban cities (especially those after post world war 2) are boring in itself.
For the most part they are - there's obvious exceptions out there. They either have a lot to do or they have a lot of outdoor activities. I personally have no problem going to a caribbean island with not many people on it as long as it has stuff to do, even if I have to drive to every beach or whatever.
One thing is for sure. People do not like suburban in nature cities. Or I should say, people find suburban oriented cities boring which is understanding because actual suburban cities (especially those after post world war 2) are boring in itself.
From a tourist perspective, there's some merit to that but it can be (and often is) a completely different story as places to live.
One thing is for sure. People do not like suburban in nature cities. Or I should say, people find suburban oriented cities boring which is understanding because actual suburban cities (especially those after post world war 2) are boring in itself.
People on City Data are not a representative sample bear in mind.
I think we can all agree that, properly funded, the sheer volume of "fun" things to do in NYC is without parallel.
Most boring? St. Louis is consistently awful in my book - unless you are a slack-jawed baseball fan from the Midwest, the city is simply lacking in stuff to do (and the food is bad, in spite of the myopia of the residents).
Most fun - New Orleans, Chicago, San Antonio
Least fun - Oklahoma City, Wichita, Omaha
OKC left me with a weird taste in my mouth, figuratively of course. I walked around the CBD for a couple of hours and saw about 20 people on a Friday night. Half the CBD was under construction, but I still only saw about two shops/restaurants. I saw a sign for the "historic arts district" in the middle of about 4 empty lots. Bricktown was a little more interesting, but for a city of OKC's size, still disappointing. Now I was only in OKC for a short amount of time, and I would like to hear from people in the area on what you think about my opinion. I may have just been in the wrong places, or expecting the wrong things.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Chicago boring?
