Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
D.C. is unlike any of these cities. None of these cities are designed like D.C. with entertainment districts all over the city. I mean, look at adams morgan and the U street corridor. Look at Dupont circle. D.C. has entertainment districts all over the city.
Boston and Philly are bar cities! They are not on DC's level when it comes to posh clubs and nightlife. They do not have more restaurants DT than DC. Especially Philly. DC is creeping up on Chicago for the most DT office space behind NYC. Everything else is subjective. Plus their DT areas are so tiny. I walked through CC in 20 minutes.
I would say Philly has the most vibrant and big-city feeling core.
But DC has a larger office core.
Boston is nice, but the core is a bit smaller than the other two.
This is a good thread, however. Too often on City Data we have silly threads like "What is more urban, Manhattan or Sioux Falls." In this thread, a reasonable case can be made for any of the three cities.
They do not have more restaurants DT than DC. Especially Philly.
Yeah right. Philly has DC beat backwards, forwards, upside down and everything else when it comes to food. Chic restaurants, authentic local food, whatever. And DC has no equivalent of Reading Terminal or the North End. DC is not a food town.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.