Households distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 1,000+)
Top 101 cities with the highest percentage of family households, population 1,000+ | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank | City | Households |
| 1. | Messiah College, PA (housing) (pop. 2,215) | 100.0% |
| 2. | University of Pittsburgh Johnstown, PA (housing) (pop. 1,572) | 100.0% |
| 3. | Lincoln University, PA (housing) (pop. 1,726) | 100.0% |
| 4. | Bangor Trident Base, WA (housing) (pop. 7,431) | 99.5% |
| 5. | Twentynine Palms Base, CA (housing) (pop. 9,756) | 99.2% |
| 6. | Quantico Base, VA (housing) (pop. 4,452) | 98.3% |
| 7. | Fort Benning South, GA (housing) (pop. 10,887) | 98.1% |
| 8. | Fort Riley North, KS (housing) (pop. 8,927) | 97.9% |
| 9. | Fort Bragg, NC (housing) (pop. 29,731) | 97.7% |
| 10. | West Point, NY (housing) (pop. 6,763) | 97.6% |
| 11. | Minot AFB, ND (housing) (pop. 5,521) | 97.6% |
| 12. | Kodiak Station, AK (housing) (pop. 1,301) | 97.6% |
| 13. | Pope AFB, NC (housing) (pop. 2,631) | 97.4% |
| 14. | Camp Pendleton South, CA (housing) (pop. 10,616) | 97.3% |
| 15. | Quantico Station, VA (housing) (pop. 8,334) | 97.3% |
| 16. | Lemoore Station, CA (housing) (pop. 7,438) | 97.2% |
| 17. | Camp Pendleton North, CA (housing) (pop. 5,200) | 97.1% |
| 18. | Whiteman AFB, MO (housing) (pop. 2,556) | 97.0% |
| 19. | Kaser, NY (housing) (pop. 4,988) | 96.9% |
| 20. | Beale AFB, CA (housing) (pop. 1,319) | 96.9% |
| 21. | Malmstrom AFB, MT (housing) (pop. 3,472) | 96.9% |
| 22. | Eielson AFB, AK (housing) (pop. 2,647) | 96.6% |
| 23. | Fort Lee, VA (housing) (pop. 3,393) | 96.3% |
| 24. | Fort Campbell North, KY (housing) (pop. 13,685) | 96.2% |
| 25. | Fort Campbell, KY (housing) (pop. 17,198) | 96.2% |
| 26. | McConnell AFB, KS (housing) (pop. 1,777) | 96.2% |
| 27. | Basin City, WA (housing) (pop. 1,092) | 96.1% |
| 28. | Warren AFB, WY (housing) (pop. 3,072) | 96.1% |
| 29. | Bethel Manor, VA (housing) (pop. 3,792) | 96.0% |
| 30. | Fort Belvoir, VA (housing) (pop. 7,100) | 95.7% |
| 31. | Fort Hood, TX (housing) (pop. 29,589) | 95.6% |
| 32. | Lackland AFB, TX (housing) (pop. 9,918) | 95.6% |
| 33. | Tyndall AFB, FL (housing) (pop. 2,994) | 95.5% |
| 34. | Kaneohe Station, HI (housing) (pop. 9,517) | 95.5% |
| 35. | Ault Field, WA (housing) (pop. 2,322) | 95.4% |
| 36. | Vandenberg AFB, CA (housing) (pop. 3,338) | 95.3% |
| 37. | Randolph AFB, TX (housing) (pop. 1,241) | 95.2% |
| 38. | New Square, NY (housing) (pop. 7,516) | 95.2% |
| 39. | Richgrove, CA (housing) (pop. 2,882) | 95.2% |
| 40. | Mountain Home AFB, ID (housing) (pop. 3,238) | 95.1% |
| 41. | Fort Gordon, GA (housing) (pop. 7,663) | 95.1% |
| 42. | Hildale, UT (housing) (pop. 2,916) | 95.0% |
| 43. | Fairchild AFB, WA (housing) (pop. 2,776) | 94.8% |
| 44. | Woodland Hills, UT (housing) (pop. 1,436) | 94.8% |
| 45. | Fort Carson, CO (housing) (pop. 13,813) | 94.7% |
| 46. | Highland, UT (housing) (pop. 17,011) | 94.6% |
| 47. | Loudoun Valley Estates, VA (housing) (pop. 3,656) | 94.4% |
| 48. | Chualar, CA (housing) (pop. 1,190) | 94.3% |
| 49. | McChord AFB, WA (housing) (pop. 2,507) | 94.2% |
| 50. | Rosita North, TX (housing) (pop. 3,661) | 94.2% |
| 51. | Marvin, NC (housing) (pop. 5,931) | 94.2% |
| 52. | Fort Riley, KS (housing) (pop. 7,761) | 94.1% |
| 53. | Lost Hills, CA (housing) (pop. 2,412) | 94.0% |
| 54. | Crosspointe, VA (housing) (pop. 5,802) | 93.9% |
| 55. | Ellsworth AFB, SD (housing) (pop. 4,142) | 93.9% |
| 56. | Fort Lewis, WA (housing) (pop. 11,046) | 93.9% |
| 57. | Grand Forks AFB, ND (housing) (pop. 2,367) | 93.8% |
| 58. | Air Force Academy, CO (housing) (pop. 6,680) | 93.8% |
| 59. | Fort Bliss, TX (housing) (pop. 8,591) | 93.8% |
| 60. | Parris Island, SC (housing) (pop. 5,867) | 93.7% |
| 61. | Alton North, TX (housing) (pop. 6,182) | 93.7% |
| 62. | Elk Ridge, UT (housing) (pop. 2,850) | 93.7% |
| 63. | Muniz, TX (housing) (pop. 1,370) | 93.7% |
| 64. | Indian Hills, TX (housing) (pop. 2,591) | 93.6% |
| 65. | Kiryas Joel, NY (housing) (pop. 21,894) | 93.6% |
| 66. | Nebo Center, CA (housing) (pop. 1,361) | 93.4% |
| 67. | Schofield Barracks, HI (housing) (pop. 16,370) | 93.3% |
| 68. | Kings Bay Base, GA (housing) (pop. 1,777) | 93.3% |
| 69. | Bangor Base, WA (housing) (pop. 6,054) | 93.0% |
| 70. | Nurillo, TX (housing) (pop. 6,188) | 93.0% |
| 71. | Rio Rico Southeast, AZ (housing) (pop. 1,761) | 93.0% |
| 72. | Biola, CA (housing) (pop. 1,623) | 93.0% |
| 73. | Rio Rico Southwest, AZ (housing) (pop. 3,076) | 93.0% |
| 74. | San Luis, AZ (housing) (pop. 31,180) | 92.9% |
| 75. | Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (housing) (pop. 2,093) | 92.9% |
| 76. | Woodside, PA (housing) (pop. 2,425) | 92.8% |
| 77. | Eagle Mountain, UT (housing) (pop. 24,217) | 92.8% |
| 78. | Coachella, CA (housing) (pop. 43,092) | 92.6% |
| 79. | South Run, VA (housing) (pop. 6,389) | 92.5% |
| 80. | Rosita South, TX (housing) (pop. 2,771) | 92.5% |
| 81. | Midway North, TX (housing) (pop. 4,752) | 92.5% |
| 82. | San Joaquin, CA (housing) (pop. 4,009) | 92.4% |
| 83. | North Fort Lewis, WA (housing) (pop. 2,699) | 92.4% |
| 84. | Penitas, TX (housing) (pop. 4,552) | 92.3% |
| 85. | Scissors, TX (housing) (pop. 3,186) | 92.3% |
| 86. | Doolittle, TX (housing) (pop. 2,769) | 92.3% |
| 87. | Talty, TX (housing) (pop. 1,773) | 92.3% |
| 88. | Las Palmas-Juarez, TX (housing) (pop. 1,895) | 92.0% |
| 89. | Nibley, UT (housing) (pop. 5,938) | 92.0% |
| 90. | Elm Creek, TX (housing) (pop. 2,469) | 91.9% |
| 91. | Colorado City, AZ (housing) (pop. 4,812) | 91.8% |
| 92. | La Paloma, TX (housing) (pop. 2,903) | 91.8% |
| 93. | Monsey, NY (housing) (pop. 18,412) | 91.8% |
| 94. | Mountain Green, UT (housing) (pop. 2,309) | 91.7% |
| 95. | Saratoga Springs, UT (housing) (pop. 22,749) | 91.7% |
| 96. | Mattawa, WA (housing) (pop. 4,476) | 91.7% |
| 97. | Mecca, CA (housing) (pop. 8,577) | 91.6% |
| 98. | Murphy, TX (housing) (pop. 19,515) | 91.6% |
| 99. | Merton, WI (housing) (pop. 3,488) | 91.6% |
| 100. | Las Lomas, TX (housing) (pop. 3,147) | 91.5% |
| 101. | Heber, CA (housing) (pop. 4,275) | 91.5% |