Intolerate Atheists Demand Removal of Memorial (churches, Mary, faith, Christianity)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What if there is a minority of Jews, Muslims, Zoroastrians, or Hindus living in that town?
"Majority rule" is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
Maybe the sheep ought to move to another town? The Founding Fathers believed a local community should be able to legislate itself without the feds telling them how to live.
I have a big problem with the cross on public property. It is abhorrent to me. I have no problem with people wearing the cross around their neck, at home, or at church. Those are private even though they make me ill.
The torture and death of Crucifixion is not a fitting remembrance.
Grow a thicker skin, (oohh, it make me ill, oooh), good grief, get over yourself...Maybe the religious, since homosexuality offends them, should go out and start bashing their skulls in with a baseball bat like back in the old days...I don't agree with their life style and it is not for me, however, you don't see me going out and trying to get them removed from society because I may find them kissing in public offensive...Live and let live...If this is what you want to do, go ahead and do it...Leave me out of it...If you are going to harass people for wanting to honor someone with a cross on public property then I think the religious right should be able to go out and bash some sculls of homosexuals...Fair is Fair...What is good for the goose is good for the gander...
Maybe the sheep ought to move to another town? The Founding Fathers believed a local community should be able to legislate itself without the feds telling them how to live.
Sorry, dude...That is what democracy is all about...You have a vote...Majority rules...If you don't vote, then guess what?...
Actually no. See there's this thing called the Constitution that puts restrictions on majority rule. If a majority wants slavery, too bad. It's unconstitutional.
We see why the far right has contempt for the Supreme Court.
Actually no. See there's this thing called the Constitution that puts restrictions on majority rule. If a majority wants slavery, too bad. It's unconstitutional.
We see why the far right has contempt for the Supreme Court.
Trust me they can vote slavery back in...The only thing that cannot be changed in the constitution is the bill of rights...The abolishment of slavery is an article to the constitution and it can be changed...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
