Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-29-2011, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,823,758 times
Reputation: 35920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Can we get back to urban planning rather than discussing word choice merits?
Yes. Sorry for the diversion. It just seemed interesting until it went too far!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-29-2011, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Virginia
18,717 posts, read 31,097,760 times
Reputation: 42988
I don't have to worry about remembering the Y story correctly, since my friend has shown me the site on Google Maps many times--it's still there and still has the same inadequate number of parking spots. And I've also been to Cleveland and heard the same story from the librarian across the street who remembers when the Y was first built (by the way, it's really fun visiting a town after you've met someone who was a city planner there--if you ever get the chance to do something like that I recommend it). Anyone who's interested can see it at 2340 Lee Road, Cleveland Heights, OH. The building is now being used as a little theater--hopefully the small parking lot is better suited for something like that. Plus, a few year ago they tore down some houses on Corydon to make an additional lot that's across the street, which I'm sure helps the situation.

To bring this back to the original topic, after you're done looking at this site take a look down Lee Rd. for an example of a middle income suburb that is extremely livable. This is not a wealthy area by any stretch of the imagination, but it has many amenities. There are ample sidewalks, and a nice assortment of useful stores (as well as coffee shops and yogurt stands). Near the intersection of Cedar and Lee there is a nice little pedestrian mall. Near the intersection of Lee and Superior you see a park system that includes an outdoor amphitheater and an ice skating rink. Libraries, churches, stores, municipal buildings, theaters, etc. all see to be within a 2 mile radius and there are sidewalks galore. The only thing I might not be happy with is the traffic on Lee Road (which I hear is pretty bad) but hey, no place is perfect and that's something I can tolerate.

If I ever needed to move to Cleveland, I would want to live in a suburb like Cleveland Heights. To borrow the terminology from the OP, sure Cleveland has issues but they aren't so bad (and I hear Cleveland is solving a lot of these issues right now, and is becoming an increasingly attractive place to live). It wouldn't matter to me. City life just isn't the right fit for me. Cleveland Heights is the kind of the town that suits my taste--I loves me the burbs.

Last edited by Caladium; 12-29-2011 at 03:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2011, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Youngstown, Oh.
5,510 posts, read 9,498,898 times
Reputation: 5627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caladium View Post
I don't have to worry about remembering the Y story correctly, since my friend has shown me the site on Google Maps many times--it's still there and still has the same inadequate number of parking spots. And I've also been to Cleveland and heard the same story from the librarian across the street who remembers when the Y was first built (by the way, it's really fun visiting a town after you've met someone who was a city planner there--if you ever get the chance to do something like that I recommend it). Anyone who's interested can see it at 2340 Lee Road, Cleveland Heights, OH. The building is now being used as a little theater--hopefully the small parking lot is better suited for something like that. Plus, a few year ago they tore down some houses on Corydon to make an additional lot that's across the street, which I'm sure helps the situation.

To bring this back to the original topic, after you're done looking at this site take a look down Lee Rd. for an example of a middle income suburb that is extremely livable. This is not a wealthy area by any stretch of the imagination, but it has many amenities. There are ample sidewalks, and a nice assortment of useful stores (as well as coffee shops and yogurt stands). Near the intersection of Cedar and Lee there is a nice little pedestrian mall. Near the intersection of Lee and Superior you see a park system that includes an outdoor amphitheater and an ice skating rink. Libraries, churches, stores, municipal buildings, theaters, etc. all see to be within a 2 mile radius and there are sidewalks galore. The only thing I might not be happy with is the traffic on Lee Road (which I hear is pretty bad) but hey, no place is perfect and that's something I can tolerate.

If I ever needed to move to Cleveland, I would want to live in a suburb like Cleveland Heights. To borrow the terminology from the OP, sure Cleveland has issues but they aren't so bad (and I hear Cleveland is solving a lot of these issues right now, and is becoming an increasingly attractive place to live). It wouldn't matter to me. City life just isn't the right fit for me. Cleveland Heights is the kind of the town that suits my taste--I loves me the burbs.
I don't know Cleveland Heights all that well, (a friend once had an apartment there that was very cool/vintage) but I've used it more than once as an example of the kind of suburb I wouldn't mind living in. It is quite literally a streetcar suburb. I think most of the pro-suburban folks would find it to be too urban, for the most part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2011, 03:48 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,523,129 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR_C View Post
I don't know Cleveland Heights all that well, (a friend once had an apartment there that was very cool/vintage) but I've used it more than once as an example of the kind of suburb I wouldn't mind living in. It is quite literally a streetcar suburb. I think most of the pro-suburban folks would find it to be too urban, for the most part.
From the views I could find, it didn't seem that urban to me, though houses were on noticeably small lots.

A suburb I would like would be similar to Brookline, MA. Though it's pricey and parts are rather urban. It also literally a streetcar suburb; and some of them are still running. The density is much higher along the streetcar line than elsewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2011, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Youngstown, Oh.
5,510 posts, read 9,498,898 times
Reputation: 5627
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
From the views I could find, it didn't seem that urban to me, though houses were on noticeably small lots.

A suburb I would like would be similar to Brookline, MA. Though it's pricey and parts are rather urban. It also literally a streetcar suburb; and some of them are still running. The density is much higher along the streetcar line than elsewhere.
It's not that urban for an east coast resident. Cleveland Heights is just about as urban as most Ohio cities. AFAIK, Cincinnati is the only Ohio city that has row housing in a significant quantity, for example.

Here is the example from Cleveland Heights I've used before: Coventry Cleveland Heights, OH - Google Maps
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2011, 05:35 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,523,129 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR_C View Post
It's not that urban for an east coast resident. Cleveland Heights is just about as urban as most Ohio cities. AFAIK, Cincinnati is the only Ohio city that has row housing in a significant quantity, for example.

Here is the example from Cleveland Heights I've used before: Coventry Cleveland Heights, OH - Google Maps
Whoops. I missed that part, that's more urban looking than other parts I found. That's what you get from not being there and thinking a quick glance at street view can give a good sample of a place.

Here's one of the more urban sections of Brookline:

brookline, ma - Google Maps

The density gets much less when you get away from certain corridors, usually the train lines.

I noticed Cleveland Heights has had a sever population decline. Is there flight from the inner suburbs as well as the city in the Cleveland metro? Boston has had a 25% population decline, but most of the inner suburbs have had stagnant populations (probably because it's hard to build new housing in them). Maybe Cleveland's inner suburbs experienced a population decline because the core has had a large economic decline, so there's little value in living near the center city?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2011, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Youngstown, Oh.
5,510 posts, read 9,498,898 times
Reputation: 5627
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Whoops. I missed that part, that's more urban looking than other parts I found. That's what you get from not being there and thinking a quick glance at street view can give a good sample of a place.

Here's one of the more urban sections of Brookline:

brookline, ma - Google Maps

The density gets much less when you get away from certain corridors, usually the train lines.

I noticed Cleveland Heights has had a sever population decline. Is there flight from the inner suburbs as well as the city in the Cleveland metro? Boston has had a 25% population decline, but most of the inner suburbs have had stagnant populations (probably because it's hard to build new housing in them). Maybe Cleveland's inner suburbs experienced a population decline because the core has had a large economic decline, so there's little value in living near the center city?
I couldn't say with any authority why Cleveland Heights had a population decline. I think you're right; the region lost population because of economic decline. But also, IMO, because it's "inner ring" it is facing the same problems as Cleveland. As people continue to sprawl into the far suburbs, it becomes easier for the "less desirable element" to move from the city into the inner 'burbs. ("less desirable" means different things to different people: race, wealth, etc.) This, and the problems associated with it, (i.e. increased crime, dipping school performance, etc.) encourages more people to leave. It's a downward spiral.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2011, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Virginia
18,717 posts, read 31,097,760 times
Reputation: 42988
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR_C View Post
It's not that urban for an east coast resident. Cleveland Heights is just about as urban as most Ohio cities. AFAIK, Cincinnati is the only Ohio city that has row housing in a significant quantity, for example.

Here is the example from Cleveland Heights I've used before: Coventry Cleveland Heights, OH - Google Maps
This is another thing I like about Cleveland Heights. For a fairly small suburb it has quite a lot of variety. It has Coventry, the hip area that you visited. It has the area near Lee Road, which is all middle income single family homes, it has some upper class homes and a street of mansions (Fairmont Blvd.), and it has a lower income area too (the section closer to East Cleveland). It's a great illustration of how suburbs can take many different types of forms and appeal toa wide variety of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2011, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Virginia
18,717 posts, read 31,097,760 times
Reputation: 42988
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR_C View Post
I couldn't say with any authority why Cleveland Heights had a population decline.
I think the entire Cleveland area saw a decline, not just the inner ring suburbs; IMO a lot of it was because the steel mills and other factories closed, TRW largely relocated to California, and Cleveland didn't react as quickly as Pittsburgh did as far as trying to remake itself. Also, you're right that it has a bit of a stigma being "inner ring", especially since it's right next to East Cleveland (a town with some poverty and crime issues).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2011, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,823,758 times
Reputation: 35920
In Pittsburgh as well, the suburbs lost population along with the city. In fact, it's still going on, or was anyway, at the 2010 census. These rust belt cities are not in the same position as the sunbelt cities of the south and west.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top