Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-28-2014, 11:07 PM
 
Location: Houston,TX
113 posts, read 175,570 times
Reputation: 51

Advertisements

I have few questions. I am new Landlord

Is application fee same as background check fee?

If a prospective tenant applied for Lease do I need to go process the application first and decide to go to next application? or can I take applications from multiple people and decide who is the right tenant.

Also do Landlords generally charge application fee? what are pros and cons

thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2014, 04:31 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,597,086 times
Reputation: 38578
Depends on your state laws. Please include your location in your profile, to get good advice.

Some states let you charge lots of application fees. Some don't.

In CA, you can only charge a maximum of around $42 for application fees, which would include whatever checks you do - credit, background, etc.

In states where you can charge whatever you can get away with, it can be lucrative to accept fees from lots of applicants.

As a CA manager, what I would do, is first look through the applications. If I knew someone wouldn't qualify without running their credit/background check, then I saved them the money and the ding on their credit. The reimbursement amount for CA doesn't cover the actual cost of the checks I would run, so I would actually lose money for the LL by running unnecessary checks.

An example might be for instance, if you won't accept people who have had a bankruptcy, and they checked on the application that they have had a bankruptcy, why run the check?

My guess would be that even in a state that allows you to charge lucrative application fees, you better still treat everyone the same, so you don't accidentally get into hot water over fair housing issues.

The rule of thumb to not get in any fair housing trouble, is to process the applications in chronological order. The first one that qualifies gets the apt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,652,336 times
Reputation: 35439
I charge the BG fee to check the person but like NomoreSnow I don't charging/bother running the app if they don't pass the criteria I set up. Even if I could charge a app fee and a BG check fee I would only charge what would cost me to do.

Last edited by Electrician4you; 01-29-2014 at 06:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 12:19 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,701 posts, read 48,261,883 times
Reputation: 78584
Quote:
Originally Posted by imarichards View Post
..........
Is application fee same as background check fee? .............

............do I need to go process the application first and decide to go to next application? or can I take applications from multiple people and decide who is the right tenant...............

Also do Landlords generally charge application fee? what are pros and cons
I've never heard it called a background check fee, but it sounds like it might be the same thing.

You can process all applications at the same time and choose the best applicant. However, be prepared to defend your choice of "best" as also being legal.

Many landlords do the "first in, first served" because that is completely defensible from a fair housing standpoint. If you choose "best". then your idea of "best" can not violate fair housing laws. You might prefer the couple with no children over the couple with two children. If the children are the reason, you open yourself up to a very expensive lawsuit. If you can defend the choice and chose the childless couple because they had better income and better credit, then you will be OK.

But you must be very certain that illegal discrimination has nothing to do with your choice.

Every landlord should have written criteria for selecting a tenant. That criteria should be applied evenly to every applicant and you must be very careful that there is nothing illegal in the criteria. If you always apply your criteria to every applicant, then your position is defensible in court.

Application fee? My opinion, it should be just enough to cover the costs. It should not be an income generator. Yes, charge one. It will help to weed out all the no-hopers who would otherwise give it a try because it doesn't cost them anything. If you don't charge a fee, you could end up with dozens of applicants that you would never ever accept, yet once you have their application, you must process it. It's a huge time waster.

Know your state laws concerning application fees. For example, I can not charge an application fee in Oregon unless I really do have a unit available and I must return fees for applications that were not processed at the time I select a tenant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 12:30 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,701 posts, read 48,261,883 times
Reputation: 78584
Adding: When you do your written criteria, OP, make it detailed enough so that you can keep out applicants that you really don't want. There are people with good credit and enough income that you genuinely must keep out of your property. So, if all your criteria calls for is good credit and sufficient income, you have no legal means to reject them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top