Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-23-2009, 10:31 PM
 
Location: Boise
4,426 posts, read 5,925,821 times
Reputation: 1701

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
you are incorrect. my property rights stance is a valid one, while yours is one of total anger. the only hate I see here is the hate coming out of your own mind. now stop sounding foolish.
really? try re-reading your posts about property rights...
if you're going to make claims against property rights violations, then perhaps you should know everything that is currently THE LAW when it comes to property rights.. not what you think it SHOULD be...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-23-2009, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Boise
4,426 posts, read 5,925,821 times
Reputation: 1701
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
I really feel sorry for your anger. you seem very confused. I take it you aren't a property owner.
I indeed own my own house with my partner... and I'm well aware of how property rights work...
I don't get to do anything I want with my land and house....if you do.. then you're lucky but that is not the norm in most of the country LET ALONE the center of Salt Lake City (population 1.5million)
so give it a rest...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2009, 10:34 PM
 
Location: Boise
4,426 posts, read 5,925,821 times
Reputation: 1701
Quote:
Originally Posted by silas777 View Post
Really? read my posts, I go to the grocerey store, parts store, fast food, gas station, car wash, mailbox, lake, hardware store ........where are they? are they disguised? If so ,as I said, then I am ok with em............... So here is what I will do for you boiseboy, I will modify my remarks, let no one say, I am not fair and balanced.... Here it is , There are no (Obvious) homosexuals around here, and I am OK with that!!

you're a piece of work...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2009, 10:35 PM
 
4,474 posts, read 5,420,138 times
Reputation: 732
I cannot help but feel the Mormon's purchased so much of downtown property JUST so they could create and incite situations like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2009, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Boise
4,426 posts, read 5,925,821 times
Reputation: 1701
The reality is.. the church got it's hands on this pedestrian corridor as part of a controversial land swap deal with the city.. so the church didn't own it a few years ago.. it was a simple public pedestrian corridor...
You have to be familiar with salt lake city to understand how this corridor is essentially the only way to get from the north side of downtown to the business district without walking 2 salt lake city blocks (4 any other city blocks) around to avoid their "property". The city should take it back through eminent domain...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2009, 08:15 AM
 
Location: Orlando, FL
132 posts, read 224,412 times
Reputation: 62
I really dont see the huge deal about it now a days. Let alone i think theres alot worse seen on tv by kids then seeing two guyrs or two girls kissing in public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2009, 08:52 AM
 
Location: I currently exist only in a state of mind. one too complex for geographic location.
4,196 posts, read 5,850,629 times
Reputation: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by boiseguy View Post
really? try re-reading your posts about property rights...
if you're going to make claims against property rights violations, then perhaps you should know everything that is currently THE LAW when it comes to property rights.. not what you think it SHOULD be...
these men were where they didn't belong, and they were escorted away. the correct action was taken, and now they are crying over spilled milk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2009, 08:53 AM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,584,933 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
these men were where they didn't belong, and they were escorted away. the correct action was taken, and now they are crying over spilled milk.
What do you mean they didn't belong there? They had every right to be there, they're human beings you know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2009, 08:54 AM
 
Location: I currently exist only in a state of mind. one too complex for geographic location.
4,196 posts, read 5,850,629 times
Reputation: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by boiseguy View Post
I indeed own my own house with my partner... and I'm well aware of how property rights work...
I don't get to do anything I want with my land and house....if you do.. then you're lucky but that is not the norm in most of the country LET ALONE the center of Salt Lake City (population 1.5million)
so give it a rest...
nor do these two trespassers get to do what they want on private property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2009, 08:55 AM
 
Location: I currently exist only in a state of mind. one too complex for geographic location.
4,196 posts, read 5,850,629 times
Reputation: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by boiseguy View Post
The reality is.. the church got it's hands on this pedestrian corridor as part of a controversial land swap deal with the city.. so the church didn't own it a few years ago.. it was a simple public pedestrian corridor...
You have to be familiar with salt lake city to understand how this corridor is essentially the only way to get from the north side of downtown to the business district without walking 2 salt lake city blocks (4 any other city blocks) around to avoid their "property". The city should take it back through eminent domain...

enough said. you have no respect for property rights. an extremist point of view. nuff said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top