Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
NOPE. There is NO country in the world that has abortions as a constitutional right. American pro abortion crowd thought it was for 49 years but they had to be corrected.
They are for the constitution. Judges are not supposed to make law unless you want to trash the constitution which you libs have to problem with.
All countries in the world pass abortions laws not the courts. Nobody is taking voting rights for asking for an I.D. to vote, abortions hasn't been ban. Guns rights hasn't been expanded but protected under the 2nd amendment. Religious rights hasn't been expanded but protected.
You are wrong in all categories.
I didn't say they were part of a country's constitution just that many civilized countries have the right protected through whatever means, even Israel and Ireland allow abortions with some even covering cost.
Religion has been promoted into a super group by this court, pay for tuition at seminaries, religious schools, pay for infrastructure and now evidently school prayer is allowed.
You could always own a gun with restrictions but now we need to allow guns outside the homes.
This court is originalist when it suits their needs and creative when needed pulling Major Doctrine out of the hat, and who knew that Corporations were people.
You are sick if you cannot understand the difference between killing an already born child, and killing an unborn one who is totally depend on it's mother's body to survive.
I'm not the one who is sick. It's those who kill their babies for no reason other than their own convenience who are sick. 98.3% of abortions are performed solely for the sake of convenience. You know... they're the "I don't want a baby because [insert random selfish reason here]" abortions.
I'm not the one who is sick. It's those who kill their babies for no reason other than their own convenience who are sick. 98.3% of abortions are performed solely for the sake of convenience. You know... they're the "I don't want a baby because [insert random selfish reason here]" abortions.
Believing a “free baby market” is the solution is not healthy.
Applying our theory to parents and children, this means that a parent does not have the right to aggress against his children, but also that the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights.
The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die.2
The law, therefore, may not properly compel the parent to feed a child or to keep it alive.3 (Again, whether or not a parent has a moral rather than a legally enforceable obligation to keep his child alive is a completely separate question.) This rule allows us to solve such vexing questions as: should a parent have the right to allow a deformed baby to die (e.g., by not feeding it)?4
The answer is of course yes, following a fortiori from the larger right to allow any baby, whether deformed or not, to die. (Though, as we shall see below, in a libertarian society the existence of a free baby market will bring such "neglect" down to a minimum.)
Believing a “free baby market” is the solution is not healthy.
Believing in abortion rights certainly isn't healthy. Abortion kills 930,000 each year. And 98.3% of those deaths are solely for the sake of someone else's convenience. You know... they're the "I don't want a baby because [insert random selfish reason here]" abortions.
Believing in abortion rights certainly isn't healthy. Abortion kills 930,000 each year. And 98.3% of those deaths are solely for the sake of someone else's convenience. You know... they're the "I don't want a baby because [insert random selfish reason here]" abortions.
Believing a “free baby market” is the solution is not healthy.
What is this obsession with the constantly bolded 930,000?
In this first place, these are not children. Not yet. Some will be, and once they are born, such passion about their safety and survival would be understandable.
Sadly, the safety and survival of children once they are in school is not as important as the "right" to buy an AR-15.
Republicans: The problem with America is kids being raise without a father.
Republicans: Single women MUST have babies if they get pregnant.
Single women have so many options now to not get pregnant in the first place and if they do they still have plan B.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
