Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you support giving Ukraine F-16s
Yes 201 39.72%
No 256 50.59%
Unsure 49 9.68%
Voters: 506. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:23 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,438 posts, read 108,833,304 times
Reputation: 116550

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
Last I heard, they have resumed shelling and missile strikes some cities as well as air strikes in Kharkiv. Every day this continues, more and more civilians will be among the dead. It is heart breaking and gut wrenching but that is the kind of war Putin is waging.
The whole thing is beyond heartbreakingly tragic. And here it is, more than 6 months in, still dragging on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:24 PM
 
47,104 posts, read 26,228,624 times
Reputation: 29595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
There are people in high places still saying "we need to push through and get the job done" in Ukraine.
The thing is, though - with what? There aren't a whole lot of fresh divisions waiting in the wings, and the days of human-wave attacks are pretty much over.

Ukrainian troops would drive their vehicles right down the roads in full daylight during the Kharkiv offensive, defending themselves form air attack with just shoulder-launched missiles. How can that work? Only because Russian attack aircraft have to go in low, now. And why is that? Because they're running out of precision-guided munitions and have to use dumb bombs and unguided rockets. Russia should have complete air supremacy, by numbers. Yet they don't.

The cupboard is running bare.

Quote:
For all we know, Russia could pull itself together and launch a new and more effective offensive. We can quibble about whether that's realistic to expect or not, but realistically, we have very little idea what Russia's capable of when it puts its mind to it.
A shooting war would be a good test case to see what a nation can do, as far as I'm concerned. There are a whole lot of Western intelligence analysts downgrading their estimates of Russia's capabilities right now.

Can they still put up a stubborn fight? Certainly. They're on the defense, which tends to be advantageous, and the war is about to move to territory they've prepared for years. If they've been diligent, that is, so possibly not.

As long as the war stays conventional, Russia doesn't have a whole lot of options that haven't been tried.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:25 PM
 
47,104 posts, read 26,228,624 times
Reputation: 29595
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockiestoandes View Post
It's not worth the time explaining the situation to them.
That's convincing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:31 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,438 posts, read 108,833,304 times
Reputation: 116550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
The cupboard is running bare.

A shooting war would be a good test case to see what a nation can do, as far as I'm concerned. There are a whole lot of Western intelligence analysts downgrading their estimates of Russia's capabilities right now.

Can they still put up a stubborn fight? Certainly. They're on the defense, which tends to be advantageous, and the war is about to move to territory they've prepared for years. If they've been diligent, that is, so possibly not.

As long as the war stays conventional, Russia doesn't have a whole lot of options that haven't been tried.
They have other advantages, though. One thing is, that Russia historically has proven very good at outlasting the enemy. If they can last long enough, and the war drags on well into next year, the West could get tired of financing it (with weapons, training, $$). The UN and other Western analysts have said, the war has reached a stalemate, and could go on for years. But it will go on only as long as Ukraine's supporters are willing to pay for it.

The other thing is, that winter is coming. Russia's also far superior at dealing with winter than any Westerners. Germany, Europe's largest country, will be the first to fold. That would at least provide income to pay for new equipment for Russia's side. Winter could change the whole picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:35 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,438 posts, read 108,833,304 times
Reputation: 116550
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockiestoandes View Post
Yes, the elites are publishing their deeds and plans (and they have some very long term and extensive plans), all the time to Joe the Six Pack, broadcasting them through CNN and BBC, just like they disclose how much money they really have and where they keep them.
You noticed! You're the only other one on this forum who's been concerned about that, besides me. It's just bizarre how they make public announcements about information that should be kept confidential.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:36 PM
 
47,104 posts, read 26,228,624 times
Reputation: 29595
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
But Russian supporters call the successful Ukraine counter offensive as the Battle of the Bulge and that Russia will take it back.
Well, they had to come up with something.

Quote:
It is also said to make Ukraine look good so it can get more reinforcements from the West.
That's somewhat contradictory to the first idea that of Ukraine falling into carefully engineered flank trap, isn't it?

Quote:
Russia still has a lot of rockets as reflected by it firing them upon Kharkiv and causing a blackout.
Which did zilch, militarily, except demonstrate Russian weaponry's ability to hit large, stationary targets.

Quote:
Furthermore, Russia may declare war upon NATO...
That would be remarkably stupid. Polish aircraft would do barrel rolls over Red Square one week later.

Quote:
...and start a draft into the military of its own citizens.
They have a hard enough time supplying what is already in Ukraine. A draft might have been useful in March. Not so much now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Niceville, FL
13,257 posts, read 22,981,327 times
Reputation: 16428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
A shooting war would be a good test case to see what a nation can do, as far as I'm concerned. There are a whole lot of Western intelligence analysts downgrading their estimates of Russia's capabilities right now.
The same goes for former Soviet ‘friendlies’ where Georgia is pondering whether it’s worth it to try to reclaim territories occupied by Russia and Armenia and Azerbaijan are disregarding a Russian-brokered cease fire to play military slap and tickle with each other again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
They have other advantages, though. One thing is, that Russia historically has proven very good at outlasting the enemy. If they can last long enough, and the war drags on well into next year, the West could get tired of financing it (with weapons, training, $$). The UN and other Western analysts have said, the war has reached a stalemate, and could go on for years. But it will go on only as long as Ukraine's supporters are willing to pay for it.

The other thing is, that winter is coming. Russia's also far superior at dealing with winter than any Westerners. Germany, Europe's largest country, will be the first to fold. That would at least provide income to pay for new equipment for Russia's side. Winter could change the whole picture.
The thing with that is that Russia is leaning on a Soviet era toughness reputation and a lot of those Soviet troops who helped create said reputation were Ukrainians rather than ethnic Russians.

So IMO not as much as a historical advantage as it might first seem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:45 PM
 
47,104 posts, read 26,228,624 times
Reputation: 29595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
They have other advantages, though. One thing is, that Russia historically has proven very good at outlasting the enemy.
Counterpoint: 1917. Where the grunts got tired of having their lives wasted, shot their officers, then marched back to Russia and shot their leaders.

Quote:
If they can last long enough, and the war drags on well into next year, the West could get tired of financing it (with weapons, training, $$).
That was Russia's best chance. But they dropped the ball by turning off the natural gas. By now Europe has had enough and is openly saying that yes, this winter will suck, but it's better than having to dance to Putin's tune. Russia would have been much better off by having Europe get bored.

Quote:
The other thing is, that winter is coming. Russia's also far superior at dealing with winter than any Westerners.
They're not fighting in Russia. No one is marching on Moscow. And they took casualties to cold weather in February, because their supply situation is a shambles - not least because everybody, at every level of the supply chain, steals what he can. It's ingrained.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2022, 02:46 PM
 
47,104 posts, read 26,228,624 times
Reputation: 29595
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachmouse View Post
The thing with that is that Russia is leaning on a Soviet era toughness reputation and a lot of those Soviet troops who helped create said reputation were Ukrainians rather than ethnic Russians.
Also noteworthy that a lot of the best Russian military kit was built in - Ukraine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2022, 03:04 PM
bu2
 
24,238 posts, read 15,075,583 times
Reputation: 13110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
I see. OK, thanks. Well, Russia could change its strategy, in view of this. It could start bombing the heck out of Ukraine again flattening entire cities. It can't do that in the areas where there are Russian majorities, or sizeable minorities, though.

This wouldn't be a development to celebrate, if it causes Russia to play hardball.
Uh, they already did that in Mariuopol which was viewed as one of the most pro-Russian cities under Ukrainian control after 2014.

They have been doing everything in the air they can, but their pilots are afraid of being shot down, so they don't venture too far into Ukraine.

Russia has done everything it can short of nukes or a mass mobilization. And they probably don't have the supplies and logistics for a mass mobilization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top