Quote:
Originally Posted by hawk55732
Still waiting.
|
Oh sorry - you are right, I addressed only one point so far, the one I actually consider the least legitimate on the list of things why Russia didn't have a choice but to attack ( did you notice - I am saying Russia, not "Putin," because since what I am going to list here, directly pertains to the Russian state security on many levels- economy and military including, and therefore removal of Putin from the scene won't change the situation, and whoever will replace him ( barred the government handpicked by Washington,) won't change anything as far as Ukrainian war goes. But this specific point in my view goes directly to Putin and Putin only, when it comes to claim of "protection of ethnic Russians in Donbass.")
So before I go point by point, you need to remember that the whole "Ukraine as anti-Russia project" was designed in Washington by one of Obama's advisers - Zbigniew Brzezinski, and his book "The grand chessboard" attests to it. So he himself was not shy about it - of what he had in mind, being the notable Russophob himself, for lack of better word.
So keeping this in mind, this is what affected Putin's decision, ( after he failed the opportunity to bring Russian army in the South-East right after the coup d'etat in Kiev back in 2014, orchestrated by the Ukrainian Nationalists. ( Minding you, SOME of these Ukrainian Nationalists were actually ethnic Russians, acquiring the "Ukrainian identity.")
So here is what happened as the result of his failure;
1. Once Washington got hold of the new Ukrainian government in Kiev ( V. Nuland wasn't shy either, expressing her opinion to
Geoffrey Pyatt ( the ambassador) whom she wanted to see in that government, and whom - not.)
So after this took place, US/IMF placed in Ukrainian government their own people ( identified mostly as "Soros people,") responsible for the economic development, and from that point on, the process of the de-industrialization of Ukraine began ( which the South-East of the country was afraid of to begin with, ) and which in no way benefited the Russian economy.
Obviously - it was the other way around, the development of the agrarian sector of Ukraine that Western corporations had the prime interest in, was now directly competing with Russian agrarian exports even in trade with China. Not to mention that all the industrial ties of the South-East benefiting earlier both economies - Russian and Ukrainian ones, were destroyed in the process.
2. The gas transit issue, which is a whole different story. If before it was up and down kind of thing, after Washington took over the Ukrainian government, it turned into the real "gas war," ( the latest revelation of Seymour Hersh regarding Biden destroying the NS 2, was the latest chapter in this "gas war" between Russia and Ukraine.)
3. Military matters.
a. US bringing the biolabs to the Russian borders.
b. US building
the maritime center (
and updating the old ports to host American warships miles away from the Russian naval base in Crimea.)
c. Ever-increasing rhetoric regarding the "return of Crimea."
d(1) Nuclear weapons ( here I am not going to contemplate on "how long does it take for the missiles located directly on the Russian border to fly to Moscow vs how long does it take for the missiles located in Kaliningrad to fly wherever."
There were people out there who calculated it all in details, and sure enough Russian military is aware of those details, deeming such potential placement of foreign strategic missiles near Kharkov as unacceptable.
d(2) Knowing the fanatical mindset of the Ukrainian nationalists (with purpose of their life in mind - the "destruction of Russia,") the creation of the "dirty bomb" is actually my personal concern, particularly now that I hear that US already supplied Ukraine with some munition with depleted uranium ( or about to.)
d(3)Training/supply of Ukrainian troops by NATO. ( As Putin has put it quite rightfully - "NATO was making itself comfortable in Ukraine all these years, without actually admitting Ukraine into this organization. What a convenience - to have all the advantages to bring its people/installations to Ukraine, to the very border of Russia, yet at the same time having no obligations to protect Ukraine."
And one more reason of course - protection of the "ethnic Russians" murdered/expelled by thousands in Donbass - the issue I already addressed as the least legitimate on Putin's list in my opinion, and I already explained why.
So these are the reasons why Putin attacked Ukraine, in order to remove the government that effectively turned Ukraine into "anti-Russian project," and my concern now is possible further escalation of this war, that Col. Macgregor mentioned , when speaking about Poland in particular, and the role it plays in this conflict.
So I hope this covers it, unless you want to dwell more on the details.