Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-09-2021, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,922 posts, read 24,055,167 times
Reputation: 14125

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lekrii View Post
If a $300 check is enough to make people not accept a company's job, that says more about how low wages are in the US than anything. This speaks to the need for an increase in minimum wage.
Yep. Employers are used to a race to the bottom and that they can 0ay for the best talent with less. They do not know what to do now that people aren't lining up. They claim it is high unemployment pay, meanwhile it has seen a decrease and more states requiring you to look for work again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-09-2021, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,115 posts, read 16,341,417 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Yep. Employers are used to a race to the bottom and that they can 0ay for the best talent with less. They do not know what to do now that people aren't lining up. They claim it is high unemployment pay, meanwhile it has seen a decrease and more states requiring you to look for work again.
they just came out with info stating the average unemployment pay through September = $34K/yr = $17/hr and change. $300/week = $7.50/hr boost.

Now, I don't *think* the Dems are either smart or nefarious enough to try an end-around on raising the minimum wage. But that is essentially what's happening. Besides, if you're being paid $17 NOT to work, what would be required for to actually make the effort?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,115 posts, read 16,341,417 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
Very big bust. Yesterday I was reading a prediction that the number might be over 1 million. Instead only 266,000? It's baffling how these forecasters could be so wrong. If the stimulus checks are keeping people from taking jobs, then the "experts" should have seen that coming.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
Ha ha...

Jobs up 468,000 in February and 916,000 in March. April report due out Friday is expected to be over 1 million.

If that's the sign of a job killer, I sure hope he keeps it up!
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Opppsssss..................
the best part is the:

Quote:
If the stimulus checks are keeping people from taking jobs, then the "experts" should have seen that coming
some "experts" did see it coming. Any "expert" that said....

1. Why are we paying people more to NOT work?
2. Why are people who suffered no income harm (retained their income, hours, etc) getting paid another stimulus check?
3. Bonus points as "experts" if the saw reports on what Americans did with Stimulus I, and incorporated it into their assessment https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...imulus-cheques
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,115 posts, read 16,341,417 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsjustmeagain View Post
Maybe it will be a jobless recovery, though. Just like the first few years under the Obama Administration.
it took until sometime in 2016 - 7 years into Obama's term, and just 1 remaining - before full-time employment returned to its 2007 level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 11:50 AM
 
22,180 posts, read 9,760,902 times
Reputation: 19720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny3 View Post
President Biden says this pathetic jobs report means we are on the right track.
My theory was the speech was written before they knew they number and they didn't change it. OR by right no track, they mean more taxes collected to give handouts to keep them in power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 11:52 AM
 
22,180 posts, read 9,760,902 times
Reputation: 19720
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
And who would blame you or anyone else who has made a similar decision over the past year?

Saw a report on the news the other day about a store worker abused by a customer over wearing a mask quit on the spot after being in her position for four years.

Why should people go back to work to suffer ongoing abuse and risk being exposed by those same idiots?
Because they want to eat? That's why WE work. Sometimes working sucks. Sometimes your manager is in a bad mood. Poor abused snowflakes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 11:54 AM
 
22,180 posts, read 9,760,902 times
Reputation: 19720
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBromhal View Post
it took until sometime in 2016 - 7 years into Obama's term, and just 1 remaining - before full-time employment returned to its 2007 level.
There were more people on SNAP when Obama left office than when he came in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 11:56 AM
 
30,316 posts, read 18,870,609 times
Reputation: 21215
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsjustmeagain View Post
U.S. added 266,000 jobs in April, as hiring slows



That's unfortunate. I was expecting the momentum if the last few months would continue. Seems like the economic recovery is stalling a little bit.
Democrat policy is like spraying Round Up on an economy.

High taxes, more regulations, shutting down the energy sector, and high gas prices will continue to hamper the economy.

Democrats are idiots- they keep using the same job killing policies that have failed in the past and then are shocked when they don't work again!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,867 posts, read 20,807,150 times
Reputation: 14868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Because they want to eat? That's why WE work. Sometimes working sucks. Sometimes your manager is in a bad mood. Poor abused snowflakes.
Then they’ll find some other form of employment that doesn’t include being abused by entitled customers/clients.

Next time the drive line at the fast food place is long or you have to be on hold for ten-fifteen minutes when calling the doctor’s or vet’s office, remember that it’s because of people who think that these people don’t deserve respect that they are short-staffed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,964,271 times
Reputation: 11259
Ben Sasse has introduced a bill to pay hiring bonuses in lieu of the current unemployment subsidy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top