Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2020, 06:14 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,535,603 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Not sure on that. If Trump wins of course you are right, but once the need to cover for Trump's fragile ego is removed there will be a lot of consideration of which action is really best for Rs.
This system had never worked well for the Republicans, although it has been positively great for the Democrats. But this cycle, the Commission has irretrievably disgraced and discredited itself.

There is no scenario under which it will be in the Republicans best interests to continue with this corrupt farce.

 
Old 10-20-2020, 06:31 PM
 
16,956 posts, read 16,774,210 times
Reputation: 10408
Oh Boy! Two minutes of uninterrupted Trump talking about Hunter Biden and the laptop!
 
Old 10-20-2020, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,367 posts, read 26,285,929 times
Reputation: 15680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
The Commission is on its last legs. The agreement between the two parties is all but certain to be cancelled by the Republicans shortly after the election, if not before, regardless of the outcome.

The debates under this Commission during past elections were shameful. This time it has been a despicable disgrace. This debate on Thursday will be the last debate conducted by this corrupt group.
If the crazy uncle is gone we can get back to normal debates where the candidates don't need to be treated like children.
 
Old 10-20-2020, 06:58 PM
 
4,160 posts, read 4,182,301 times
Reputation: 2078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
The Commission is on its last legs. The agreement between the two parties is all but certain to be cancelled by the Republicans shortly after the election, if not before, regardless of the outcome.

The debates under this Commission during past elections were shameful. This time it has been a despicable disgrace. This debate on Thursday will be the last debate conducted by this corrupt group.

Agreed. The presidential debates control should be giving back to League of Women Voters.

Quote from wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...te_sponsorship)

Quote:
The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public.

According to the LWV, they pulled out because "the campaigns presented the League with their debate agreement on September 28, two weeks before the scheduled debate. The campaigns' agreement was negotiated 'behind closed doors' ... [with] 16 pages of conditions not subject to negotiation. Most objectionable to the League...were conditions in the agreement that gave the campaigns unprecedented control over the proceedings.... [including] control the selection of questioners, the composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues."[24]
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:42 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,535,603 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by cw30000 View Post
Agreed. The presidential debates control should be giving back to League of Women Voters.

Quote from wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...te_sponsorship)
It is not going "back" to anything.
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:57 AM
 
1,514 posts, read 892,552 times
Reputation: 1961
Only Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones, Glenn Beck and only a handful of Fox News / Infowars reporters should moderate every single debate as everyone knows only they are credible and unbiased. Everyone other then those people and organization is Fake News and a hoax. Even the previous Fox News reporter my candidate would not listen too. He's a hoax and Fake News! All is a hoax and Fake Newz!

Also, muting microphones so it at least gives the impression of a debate and not a interrupting match and verbal free for all food fight?! No! Censorship! Fake Newz by the biased media. No one wants that and my candidate didn't agree to giving the other candidate 2 full minutes to speak! I'm taking my ball and going home!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top