Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Shame on you for wishing the the SC devolve into the gutter. These people are supposed to be more highly evolved, have more integrity, choose the high road instead of the low road, and above petty and destructive biases. That's why we put them there.
Can you honestly say Ginsberg is “above petty and destructive biases”? Honestly. His rulings are far less partisan than Ginsberg’s have been. And if there is now a bias moving forward? Well, Democrats brought that on themselves with their dirty politics. But here’s my guess. He’s a better person than I and will continue to maintain judicial impartiality and make decision per the Constitution.
That statement means nothing in regards to perjury. All of his observations are just that, his observations, they hold no weight, and you will see that not a single person will charge Kavanaugh with perjury for this.
ANd then you can ask yourself, why? Well, the answer has already been given to you, but you do not want to listen.
Do you even know why Flake did this. It had nothing to do with caving to political pressures
Of course it does. He already put out he was voting yes. Only then did the Democrats trot out their activists to ambush him in the elevator and then his good buddy Coons to strong arm him. Then he made his “conditions.” Please. In the course of things it doesn’t matter as the investigation will show what we already know - Ford’s accusation has no corroboration.
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 Do you want a truthful unbiased impartial judge as a SC justice - or would you prefer a known liar - this from a Yale classmate:
and a blatant political partisan - both of which Kavanaugh clearly revealed himself to be?
My entire issue with Kavanaugh is his inappropriate and unprofessional, biased, lacking in judicial temperament performance.
His insubordinate, disrespectful rudeness to Amy Klobuchar was unacceptable.
Biased attacks on Democrats, Clintons and conspiracy theories - frightening.
The man harbors hate, anger, and bias - and would be subject to recusal demands from attys on the wrong side of the political specturm.
He certainly had a right to express his emotional angst at the scrutiny and allegations.
But voicing his political bias and hatred was a bridge too far. No judicial impartiality in sight - anywhere.
Is THIS what you want on the bench?
are you talking about Kavanaugh or SC Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.......is she impartial?
she said to reporters of President Trump:
Quote:
"He is a faker," "He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
was that impartiality coming from a SC Justice on the Bench?
yeah but Kavanaugh is the problem for libs when it comes to impartiality.
Why do you have a problem with the FBI investigating. Are you scared what they will find. Just let it be and stop complaining
The FBI will be interviewing Ford's "witnesses" who have already stated they have no idea what she's talking about under the penalty of perjury/felony; law. Including her "great friend" who apparently apologized to Ford for not backing her story up...so Ford went on to talk about her friend's "issues" insinuating that her friend was mentally unstable, in her best baby (acting, no tears) voice.
Why waste tax payer dollars beating an already dead horse?
Then again? Democrats LOVE to waste everyone else's money.
Of course it does. He already put out he was voting yes. Only then did the Democrats trot out their activists to ambush him in the elevator and then his good buddy Coons to strong arm him. Then he made his “conditions.” Please. In the course of things it doesn’t matter as the investigation will show what we already know - Ford’s accusation has no corroboration.
I was wondering if you would still want him confirmed if the allegations were somehow proved.
What excuses for delaying the USSC vote will Dems come up with next, after the 1-wk FBI inv. they demanded is finished?
What excuses for delaying the USSC vote will Dems come up with next, after the 1-week FBI investigation they demanded is finished?
The likelihood of the Dems (or even Jeff Flake) saying, "OK, we're satisfied, now we'd be happy to go ahead with the vote" is somewhere between "No" and "Hell No", despite the Republicans doing exactly what they asked.
So what excuse will they trot out next?
Some possibilities:
1.) Trump restricted the FBI investigation.
2.) Now we discovered that a week wasn't enough, which we had never guessed before despite asking for exactly that.
3.) We have more women ready to accuse him of something or other, after weeks of coaching by Democrats.
Any other guesses? We'll probably find out which excuse(s) the Democrats conjure up starting on Friday Oct. 5, or sooner.
And we already showed how you were wrong. Repetition does not make your point stronger.
No, I'm not wrong and you haven't shown me anything except how to use legal semantics to escape a charge of perjury.
That doesn't change the fact that Kavanaugh is a liar - but, of course, in the age of Trump - words have zero meaning. A master liar has a cult willing to state a lie is not a lie.
And the Mad Hatter's Tea Party continues.
And, Kavanaugh lied to the Committee - and the lesser among us are willing to accept a self-interested narcissist who has no respect for the truth - to ascend to the SC.
The country is going to hell.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.