Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Let's see your "credible" evidence? There has been none put forth. It's a complete hoax, and you know it.
Because we deny this so-called "climate change," a.k.a. "global warming," does not make us "scientifically illiterate." It just means we deny your "evidence" which has been manipulated and manufactured to show what you want to show, in order to support your agenda. Everyone knows this. Even you.
Funny that you ask for credible evidence. There are countless posts in this thread that ask the same thing of the deniers. I've personally asked repeatedly for proof that man made global warming is a hoax. To date, not one shred of evidence has been presented by the denier crowd to support their claims.
Do yourself a favor and read this thread before you embarrass yourself any further. There are numerous links to scientific research which strongly indicate man made global warming is real and happening as we speak. On that note I will repeat the request I made earlier that your denier brethren consistently cannot or will not provide: Please provide credible evidence that man made global warming is a hoax.
It`s like every other post I have a warmer challenging me about stratospheric cooling, rising sea levels and global temperature records.
This warmer whak-a-mole of ignorance is really getting tedious!
For people who claim to have a lock on science, the very basic concepts of physics and Earth`s history seem to be a complete mystery.
Processes that have been going on for tens of thousands of years are held up as proof positive that CO2, to the exclusion of all else, is the major cause of alleged global warming that doesn`t seem to exist anywhere except in adjusted temperature records that are always changing.
It`s like every other post I have a warmer challenging me about stratospheric cooling, rising sea levels and global temperature records.
This warmer whak-a-mole of ignorance is really getting tedious!
For people who claim to have a lock on science, the very basic concepts of physics and Earth`s history seem to be a complete mystery.
Processes that have been going on for tens of thousands of years are held up as proof positive that CO2, to the exclusion of all else, is the major cause of alleged global warming that doesn`t seem to exist anywhere except in adjusted temperature records that are always changing.
**** people. get a clue!
Your post is nothing more than an opinion piece. It is painfully obvious that you either did not read or completely ignored the posts where we acknowledge the earth's climate goes through natural warming and cooling periods. Us "warmers" aren't disputing that. We have evidence (it's been posted ad nauseam in this thread) that the earth is going through a warming trend right now when it should be continuing on a natural cooling phase. The evidence gathered by credible climate scientists from around the world points to man's dumping of inordinate amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere as a major factor. Are you saying you know more about this than climate scientists? I challenge you to provide evidence to support your claims that this is some sort of worldwide hoax.
It`s like every other post I have a warmer challenging me about stratospheric cooling, rising sea levels and global temperature records.
This warmer whak-a-mole of ignorance is really getting tedious!
For people who claim to have a lock on science, the very basic concepts of physics and Earth`s history seem to be a complete mystery.
Processes that have been going on for tens of thousands of years are held up as proof positive that CO2, to the exclusion of all else, is the major cause of alleged global warming that doesn`t seem to exist anywhere except in adjusted temperature records that are always changing.
**** people. get a clue!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie
Your post is nothing more than an opinion piece. It is painfully obvious that you either did not read or completely ignored the posts where we acknowledge the earth's climate goes through natural warming and cooling periods. Us "warmers" aren't disputing that. We have evidence (it's been posted ad nauseam in this thread) that the earth is going through a warming trend right now when it should be continuing on a natural cooling phase. The evidence gathered by credible climate scientists from around the world points to man's dumping of inordinate amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere as a major factor. Are you saying you know more about this than climate scientists? I challenge you to provide evidence to support your claims that this is some sort of worldwide hoax.
Nope.
The Stratosphere really has cooled dramatically over the past 40 years.
Sea levels really have been raising for thousands of years.
Ice sheet really have been retreating for as long as sea levels have been raising.
What you call opinions are in reality "facts".
As for that global temperature record, there isn`t one.
Never has been.
The closest thing we have to it is the satellite record, but that doesn`t show very much warming.
The closest thing we have to it is the satellite record, but that doesn`t show very much warming.
Satellites do not measure surface temperatures........ Satellites do not measure temperature. They measure radiances in various wavelength bands, which must then be mathematically inverted to obtain indirect inferences of temperature. The resulting temperature profiles depend on details of the methods that are used to obtain temperatures from radiances. As a result, different groups that have analyzed the satellite data have produced differing temperature datasets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satell...e_measurements
Satellites do not measure surface temperatures........ Satellites do not measure temperature. They measure radiances in various wavelength bands, which must then be mathematically inverted to obtain indirect inferences of temperature. The resulting temperature profiles depend on details of the methods that are used to obtain temperatures from radiances. As a result, different groups that have analyzed the satellite data have produced differing temperature datasets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satell...e_measurements
You're posting graphs from ARS Technica? They are hardly scientists and are also owned by a travel company. According to the report almost all of their employees work from home. Sounds fishy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
