Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A. Your links don't work.
B. Please learn the difference between regional weather and global climate. Not saying whatever weather you're cutting here is a result of it but a warming planet can create more snow in some areas, colder temps, etc.
A. Your links don't work.
B. Please learn the difference between regional weather and global climate. Not saying whatever weather you're cutting here is a result of it but a warming planet can create more snow in some areas, colder temps, etc.
Yeah, well that`s kinda my point.
I`ve looked for colder temperatures recorded back in 1931 when a lot of these stations came into being and I`m just not seeing it.
If CO2 is driving temperatures higher, and if CO2 is increasing everywhere on the planet, it follows that most places should show warming that corresponds to the increase in CO2.
In fact, what I do see in these remote stations that haven`t had buildings, parking lots and airports built up around them is cooling.
Your problem is (1.) nobody experienced anything other than a cool, temperate July in the Northern Hemisphere and a frigid bitter cold in the Southern Hemisphere, and (2.) it's easy to predict from the outset now that every year will be a so-called hottest year on record as reported by globalists.
I`ve looked for colder temperatures recorded back in 1931 when a lot of these stations came into being and I`m just not seeing it.
If CO2 is driving temperatures higher, and if CO2 is increasing everywhere on the planet, it follows that most places should show warming that corresponds to the increase in CO2.
In fact, what I do see in these remote stations that haven`t had buildings, parking lots and airports built up around them is cooling.
This makes the perpetual rehashing of the "Warmest _______ ever!" headline highly suspect.
You're just looking at Michigan, that can deviate from the worldwide trend. Also there are around 500 sensors in Michigan and that covers 90 years, you can't just look at a very small area like Michigan and draw conclusions based on comparing 1931 to 2015. The trend is world wide but if you're retired and have time on your hands.......
You're just looking at Michigan, that can deviate from the worldwide trend. Also there are around 500 sensors in Michigan and that covers 90 years, you can't just look at a very small area like Michigan and draw conclusions based on comparing 1931 to 2015. The trend is world wide but if you're retired and have time on your hands.......
You can use the same website to research temperature records wherever you like.
I live in Michigan, so Michigan is of interest to me, but I have also looked elsewhere, avoiding areas that have experienced urbanization and industrialization (cow pastures are best), and I just don`t see a pattern of warming coinciding with increased atmospheric CO2.
In fact, it appears, in most cases, that temperatures have declined over the past eighty some years in remote areas.
If CO2 drives global warming, the same CO2 that is increasing the temperature in Jakarta, Indonesia should be increasing the temperature in Lola, Kansas.
If it isn`t, we have a problem.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
