Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is an informative video, however, Still doesn't really address realities imo. He alludes to a govt that simply doesn't in reality work the way he alludes.
Nationalizing a bank, or having the Treasurer issue the currency isn't going to address many of the issues in banking and govt. imo.
The argument that converting to an equity based system from a debt based system cannot be done is flawed. Yes there would need to be cooperation to do it well. A system based in debt and bondage is not sustainable.
A debt based system is a choice. It was conceived as such. Dominating the world should not be someones ideal. I am not sure who this "we" you speak of is either. The 1% or less is the one dominating the world. You think you are part of a group that is?
Survival of the fittest through the creation and distribution of the most fit currency. We dominate mostly in constructive ways.
We as in the USA in general, and yes I include myself. I have prospered greatly both due to my own endeavors and investments, but not without support from our fiat/debt based system.
Survival of the fittest through the creation and distribution of the most fit currency. We dominate mostly in constructive ways.
We as in the USA in general, and yes I include myself. I have prospered greatly both due to my own endeavors and investments, but not without support from our fiat/debt based system.
Survival of the fittest is not about domination. Things are always changing. Currencies are no exception. This is linked directly to those at the top of the system model. So you think that without debt backing the currency you would not prosper?
Your second analogy is simply a relative analogy. Do you want to be a feeder fish for a giant whale or a small shark? The currency alone cannot be used as a basis. That same domination as you put it, has also enabled endless wars.
It is those at the top of the corporate hierarchy that are benefiting. What they do is for themselves. Govt investing in debt slavery of their so-called citizens is insane and unsustainable.
Survival of the fittest is not about domination. Things are always changing. Currencies are no exception. This is linked directly to those at the top of the system model. So you think that without debt backing the currency you would not prosper?
Your second analogy is simply a relative analogy. Do you want to be a feeder fish for a giant whale or a small shark? The currency alone cannot be used as a basis. That same domination as you put it, has also enabled endless wars.
It is those at the top of the corporate hierarchy that are benefiting. What they do is for themselves. Govt investing in debt slavery of their so-called citizens is insane and unsustainable.
I believe that the fittest naturally dominate. Whether directly intended or not. As humans we naturally dominate. As Men we naturally dominate. As a successful country we naturally dominate. Some one has to dominate or at least share in it. And IMO that is not necessarily all bad. Wars are of course the exception.
As a physician I would have prospered on a gold std. IMO I've done better and I'm richer today because of central policies. State scholarships, low interest rate loans, Medicare and other general medical funding. QE's and such.
The fiat serves the people. Sovereign debt serves and benefits the people. I owe next to nothing to any private bank.
Everything is for the people, they are the source and recipient. It can be no other way. They are the alpha and the omega in an economic system, however that doesn't mean that those at the top by definition should receive more than those who have been placed at the bottom.
I believe that the fittest naturally dominate. Whether directly intended or not. As humans we naturally dominate. As Men we naturally dominate. As a successful country we naturally dominate. Some one has to dominate or at least share in it. And IMO that is not necessarily all bad. Wars are of course the exception.
As a physician I would have prospered on a gold std. IMO I've done better and I'm richer today because of central policies. State scholarships, low interest rate loans, Medicare and other general medical funding. QE's and such.
Domination is seen through the perception of value in hierarchy and control of such. Successful models do not require domination nor hierarchy. This is most definitely a Male perceptual tendency, however. LOL.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
