Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2013, 04:20 PM
 
775 posts, read 740,485 times
Reputation: 316

Advertisements

Interesting forum post of a quiz that any self educated, self righteous "climate change denier" should take.

I say this because most of you guys would horribly fail a high school honors physics test, and wouldn't even try to address any scientific question...unless if that question has political implications, in which case you suddenly, magically become experts on the matter. Suspicious?

StarDestroyer.Net BBS • View topic - Just for fun: global warming literacy quiz

Quote:
1. Why did scientists first devise the "greenhouse effect" theory?
  1. To justify increased spending on environmental research and technologies.
  2. To explain why the Earth is not mostly frozen over.
  3. As an excuse to oversimplify highly complex and unpredictable environmental patterns.
  4. To explain the so-called "hockey stick" pattern, which showed global temperatures rising in the late 20th century.
  5. They are being controlled by a conspiracy of liberals, environmentalists, and UN leaders whose shared goal is the destruction of America.
  6. It was an accidental mathematical prediction deriving from unrelated research, and researchers seized upon it.
[Reveal] Spoiler:



2. Who first publicly argued that human industrial activity could contribute significantly to the greenhouse effect?
  1. Al Gore in 2006, in his documentary called "An Inconvenient Truth".
  2. Stephen Hawking in 1993 at Cambridge, UK.
  3. Linus Torvalds in 1991 at Helsinki, Finland.
  4. The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) at the UN, in 1988.
  5. Svante Arrhenius in 1896 at Stockholm, Sweden.
[Reveal] Spoiler:



3. The mechanism underlying the greenhouse gas theory has been extensively modified since its simplistic origins. How does the present-day "greenhouse effect" theory work?
  1. Greenhouse gases are theorized to trap some of the Sun's rays, so that they cannot be reflected back to space.
  2. Greenhouse gases are theorized to block some of the infrared radiation from the Earth's surface, keeping it from escaping into space.
  3. Greenhouse gases are theorized to block some of the infrared radiation from the Earth's surface and atmosphere, keeping it from escaping into space.
  4. Greenhouse gases are theorized to regulate atmospheric temperatures through complex mathematical models in which they alter the electromagnetic frequency of solar radiation as it bombards the Earth, thus changing its energy content.
  5. The "greenhouse effect" theory is a fraud. It does not work.
  6. None of the above.
[Reveal] Spoiler:







4. Researchers have conducted experiments to determine that even a one third reduction in the concentration of CO2 in a gas chamber would make only 0.4% difference in infrared radiation transmission. Therefore, they concluded that changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration would make no significant difference.
  1. The above statement is true, and proves that man-made CO2 makes no difference.
  2. The above statement is true, but the researchers erred in their methods and conclusions.
  3. The above statement is true, but we have not heard about it because the mainstream media is not interested in reporting the story.
  4. The above statement is partially true, but it contains numerous misrepresentations.
  5. The above statement is false. No one is certain who first began spreading this story.
[Reveal] Spoiler:



5. The most important piece of evidence for the "greenhouse effect" theory is:
  1. The IPCC's "hockey stick" graph of temperature increases in recent decades.
  2. The melting of glaciers.
  3. Unusually violent and unpredictable weather patterns in recent years, such as hurricanes.
  4. Meterological data dating back to the early 20th century.
  5. Gas radiation absorption experiments.
  6. NASA's detailed modeling of atmospheric patterns conducted in the 1980s.
[Reveal] Spoiler:





6. Ice core sampling data has shown that ancient geological warming periods at the ends of ice ages began before sharp CO2 increases in the atmosphere. Typically, they began about 800 years earlier. In short, when the ice ages ended, the warming began before the CO2 increase, not after.
  1. The statement above is true, and indicates that CO2 was not the trigger for past warming periods. However, this does not disprove CO2 greenhouse gas theory.
  2. The statement above is true, and indicates that CO2 was not the trigger for past warming periods. This disproves CO2 greenhouse gas theory.
  3. The statement above is partially true, but we lack the precision to be so accurate with our time estimates of such ancient events, so global warming deniers are taking advantage of measurement uncertainty in order to force a preferred conclusion.
  4. The statement above is a popular mythology. The story was originally manufactured by conservative bloggers and took on a life of its own through the Internet.
[Reveal] Spoiler:





Suggested Reading:

EDIT: slightly improved the wording of the questions, added a few more false answers to make guessing more difficult, and added one more question. Also added links to suggested reading material.
Let me know how well you do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2013, 05:00 PM
 
76 posts, read 106,200 times
Reputation: 55
What difference does it make?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2013, 05:05 PM
 
79,914 posts, read 44,174,531 times
Reputation: 17209
Hardly anyone denies that climates change. Why do people rail against ghosts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2013, 05:55 PM
 
Location: CO/UT/AZ/NM Catch me if you can!
6,926 posts, read 6,932,822 times
Reputation: 16509
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Hardly anyone denies that climates change. Why do people rail against ghosts?
Well, that was a disingenuous reply if I've ever seen one. There's plenty of folks on this board who refuse to accept that the climate is changing right before their eyes. A few admit it's changing - but that's just natural they say. And a large perportion still think climate change is a fairy tale invented by lefties with their own agenda to push.

So, which group do YOU fall into?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2013, 06:15 PM
 
79,914 posts, read 44,174,531 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post
Well, that was a disingenuous reply if I've ever seen one. There's plenty of folks on this board who refuse to accept that the climate is changing right before their eyes.
Where. Anyone here disagree that climates change?

Quote:
A few admit it's changing - but that's just natural they say. And a large perportion still think climate change is a fairy tale invented by lefties with their own agenda to push.

So, which group do YOU fall into?
Climates change. Always have, always will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2013, 06:31 PM
 
30,059 posts, read 18,655,134 times
Reputation: 20862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sci Fi Fan View Post
Interesting forum post of a quiz that any self educated, self righteous "climate change denier" should take.

I say this because most of you guys would horribly fail a high school honors physics test, and wouldn't even try to address any scientific question...unless if that question has political implications, in which case you suddenly, magically become experts on the matter. Suspicious?

StarDestroyer.Net BBS • View topic - Just for fun: global warming literacy quiz



Let me know how well you do.
Once again, a liberal claiming the exclusive "high ground" of science while showing absolute contempt and disregard for the scientific method and the strength of randomized, blinded, prospective studies.

Liberals simply embarrass themselves by promoting such idiocy......................... again.

The CULT of global warming KNOWS that man made global warming is true, in spite of no definitive evidence to support this premise. This, of course, is the opposite of science. However, never point this out to a liberal, who is busying worshiping at the altar of man made global warming and ignoring any contrary evidence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2013, 06:38 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,035,296 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Once again, a liberal claiming the exclusive "high ground" of science while showing absolute contempt and disregard for the scientific method and the strength of randomized, blinded, prospective studies.
...he notes without citation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2013, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,284,048 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post
Well, that was a disingenuous reply if I've ever seen one. There's plenty of folks on this board who refuse to accept that the climate is changing right before their eyes. A few admit it's changing - but that's just natural they say. And a large perportion still think climate change is a fairy tale invented by lefties with their own agenda to push.

So, which group do YOU fall into?
Perhaps he thinks it can't possibly be due to greenhouse gas emissions because we use magic carbon dioxide of a sort that doesn't trap heat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2013, 06:38 PM
 
Location: west central Georgia
2,240 posts, read 1,385,755 times
Reputation: 906
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sci Fi Fan View Post
Interesting forum post of a quiz that any self educated, self righteous "climate change denier" should take.

I say this because most of you guys would horribly fail a high school honors physics test, and wouldn't even try to address any scientific question...unless if that question has political implications, in which case you suddenly, magically become experts on the matter. Suspicious?

StarDestroyer.Net BBS • View topic - Just for fun: global warming literacy quiz



Let me know how well you do.
You dis-invited people to take your silly quiz by insulting anyone who doesn't have your particular view of things. So, no thanks.
By the way, were you in honors physics in high school and was that last year?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2013, 06:44 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,536 posts, read 17,211,948 times
Reputation: 17562
You best lower your standards as many people who voted for Obama have no idea who Obama's VP is, let alone this questionaire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top