Global Warming Literacy Test (how much, dollars, private school, money)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Again (laughably) a liberal does not understand the premise of science.
It is incumbent to disprove the null hypothesis to prove a scientific theory. Most liberals are devoid of any scientific knowledge (as you have so clumsily revealed) that they think that one must disprove a premise, otherwise it is true. This is the idiocy of global warming.
Elvis is alive and well and is selling ice cream on Jupiter to aliens. Please prove this wrong, otherwise it is true. You see, that it is the lunacy of "global warming" and is the antithesis of science. Liberals, most of which have never studied ANY scientific endeavor, nor have ever published in the literature, are too dense to understand this.
Ignorance is often revealed by the definitive, confidence expression of fallacious information- this is global warming.
If YOU have a definitive, randomized, blinded, prospective, peer reviewed study to CONFIRM global warming, please present your scientific findings and statistical analysis, as it will be the first that the scientific world has seen.
Once again, a liberal claiming the exclusive "high ground" of science while showing absolute contempt and disregard for the scientific method and the strength of randomized, blinded, prospective studies.
Liberals simply embarrass themselves by promoting such idiocy......................... again.
The CULT of global warming KNOWS that man made global warming is true, in spite of no definitive evidence to support this premise. This, of course, is the opposite of science. However, never point this out to a liberal, who is busying worshiping at the altar of man made global warming and ignoring any contrary evidence.
I love how you evade actually taking the quiz, and instead post superfluous, sophistic lawyer-speak, vaguely citing "no definitive evidence", despite the OP's test indicating precisely the opposite, and calling global warming supporters part of a "cult" despite the theory being supported by every credible scientific organization in the world.
I love how you evade actually taking the quiz, and instead post superfluous, sophistic lawyer-speak, vaguely citing "no definitive evidence", despite the OP's test indicating precisely the opposite, and calling global warming supporters part of a "cult" despite the theory being supported by every credible scientific organization in the world.
Please, pick a position. Is it global warming or climate change?
Again (laughably) a liberal does not understand the premise of science.
It is incumbent to disprove the null hypothesis to prove a scientific theory. Most liberals are devoid of any scientific knowledge (as you have so clumsily revealed) that they think that one must disprove a premise, otherwise it is true. This is the idiocy of global warming.
Ignorance is often revealed by the definitive, confidence expression of fallacious information- this is global warming.
Once again, a liberal claiming the exclusive "high ground" of science while showing absolute contempt and disregard for the scientific method and the strength of randomized, blinded, prospective studies.
Liberals simply embarrass themselves by promoting such idiocy......................... again.
The CULT of global warming KNOWS that man made global warming is true, in spite of no definitive evidence to support this premise. This, of course, is the opposite of science. However, never point this out to a liberal, who is busying worshiping at the altar of man made global warming and ignoring any contrary evidence.
Scientific inquiry is separated from ideological rigidity by a willingness to entertain questions and admit doubt. The giveaway of ideology is emotional hostility to skeptics.Warmers today have it in spades. Just as the church once reacted punitively to Galileo for abandoning the party line, so do ideologicalwarmists to those who do not accept the dogma of warming political correctness.
Most'em,Leastways
Yes, the scientists who actually study climate are convinced that anthropometric global warming as real. I suppose you know more than they do. Oh that's right, they all have an "agenda" to bring down the free enterprise system.
Yes, the scientists who actually study climate are convinced that anthropometric global warming as real. I suppose you know more than they do. Oh that's right, they all have an "agenda" to bring down the free enterprise system.
Here are some of the ignorant, devoid of scientific knowledge liberals (we presume) who do not understand the premise of science.
From the same scientists that bring you the global warming hoax:
"At this point, 95% of the world’s climatologists are agreed….Once the freeze starts, it will be too late. (Douglas Colligan, “Brace Yourself for Another Ice Age,” Science Digest,February, 1973)
“The cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people in poor nations. It has already made food and fuel more precious, thus increasing the price of everything we buy. If it continues, and no strong measures are taken to deal with it, the cooling will cause world famine, world chaos, and probably world war, and this could all come by the year 2000.(Lowell Ponte, The Cooling, 1976)
"The facts have emerged, in recent years and months, from research into past ice ages. They imply that the threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind. (Nigel Calder, former editor of New Scientist and producer of scientific television documentaries, "In the Grip of a New Ice Age,” International Wildlife, July 1975.
"I believe that increasing global air pollution, through its effect on the reflectivity of the earth, is currently dominant and is responsible for the temperature decline of the past decade or two. (Red Bryson, “Environmental Roulette,” Global Ecology: Readings Toward a Rational Strategy for Man, John P. Holdren and Paul R.Erlich, eds., 1971)
Many of you will recognize these names. They are the same people that started the global warming scam. No one paid attention to them on global cooling though. Good thing too. We’d feel kinda foolish if we based our lives or government policy on a hoax, now wouldn’t we.
The Acid Rain scare has now been exposed as one of the largest scams in history, but scientists learned a valuable lesson. In 1980, the U.S. Federal Government launched the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP), employing 700 hundred scientists, many who now claim warming, at a cost of $500 million. The NAPAP study found that Acid Rain was non-threatening to the environment or humans. It was mainly a affected 2% of lake surface in the Adirondacks, which was made less acidic with cheap and quick liming. Human activity improving the environment? Imagine that.
Before 1860, when forests around those lakes began to be cut and burned (which lowers acidity) the lakes were more acid than today. The Clean Air Act (which was based on Acid Rain scare) was passed while the NAPAP findings were hidden from Congress and the public. The findings were systematically kept secret until “60 Minutes” aired a broadcast about the scam several years later. Think that was in 1996 but can't remember exactly. Sometime when Clinton was in office.
In Europe, the alleged destruction of forests by Acid Rain proved to be a hoax. Forests are larger and trees grow more rapidly now than they did 100 years ago according to European forest resource surveys.
The Acid Rain scare reminds us of a valuable lesson that applies to the Global Warming/Climate Change hoax. A false alarm can be raised quickly and easily. Quelling the alarm is hard and slow. The proper research requires time. And by the time that the research is complete, many people have a stake (normally monetary) in wanting scientific truth not to be heard. I’m speaking of people paid to research the “problem”; advocacy groups who gain public support from the lies; and bureaucrats/politicians who have a stake in not being shown to have been in error and who have already built a career on the alleged problem. Not surprisingly, many of the same scientists that warned us about Acid Rain started the Global Warming scare. But they learned their lesson. Under any circumstances never find proof that warming doesn’t exist. Or the money stops.
The federal government granted $23 billion in research grants in FY2010 alone. As soon as scientists say it aint real the money is gone. but there is no motivation to overlook contrary evidence, unless you want to make the monthly mortgage and car payments and send little Johnny to private school.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is the idiocy of global warming.
Oh that's right, they all have an "agenda" to bring down the free enterprise system.
