Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It can be easily verified to see if it is true. I am just reporting on what Hannity said and getting opinions of a city who is without guns in a moment like this, true or not. Still something to ponder. No guns with terrorists running around?
The only thing to ponder is if this thread is based on fact or a lie and it sounds like Hannity might of lied to you again by feeding you false information again.
They will be arrested if they own guns? No wonder they were terrified when the terrorists were running around and the only thing the cops could do is tell them to stay inside?
I think this proves gun ownership is essential. The police can't be everywhere.
Gun ownership is still legal in blue states.
Unfortunately, paranoia and gun fetish are exclusively conservative things
If you don't like the constitution, then work to amend it.
Good luck.
Wow! It must be painful to you to live in a gun-control state... isn't California one of the states with the strictest gun laws?
Good luck try to change it.
Wow! It must be painful to you to live in a gun-control state... isn't California one of the states with the strictest gun laws?
Good luck try to change it.
I don't own a firearm.
I fully support the 2nd Amendment and vote against Senators Feinstein and Boxer whenever they run for re-election.
California is much more conservative than it's recent voting record suggests - however I am a minority here in Los Angeles County.
My Congresswoman is as liberal as they get.
Just because California has draconian and unconstitutional gun laws does not mean that are in compliance with the 2nd Amendment.
Liberals hate the constitution - that is why they ignore it.
Well it was on Hannity so it could be suspicious but still verifiable. Watching Greta now. I can do a search on Hannity web site.
He said there is a sign going into Watertown that says as much, not to have guns in the city.
Yet, once again, you post bogus information with no links.
You're regularly wrong.
I see a pattern here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Factsplease
^^Enough said! Why is anyone still debating this? Apparently Hannity gave false information.
This is how some people post.
They post lies and erroneous "facts" and expect others to correct them or fix it.
It's a pattern.
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144
It can be easily verified to see if it is true. I am just reporting on what Hannity said and getting opinions of a city who is without guns in a moment like this, true or not. Still something to ponder. No guns with terrorists running around?
Yet you chose not to verify.
Don't complain when you get ridiculous responses to your ridiculous allegations.
They're not allowed to own fiyah ahms in Boston? What a bunch of wimps. The patriots of the Revolution are turning over in their graves.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
