Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2013, 08:28 AM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,499,649 times
Reputation: 1406

Advertisements

10 Years Later, Looking at Repeal of Glass-Steagall - NYTimes.com

Former Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo to Pay SEC’s Largest-Ever Financial Penalty Against a Public Company's Senior Executive; 2010-197; October 15, 2010
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2013, 08:30 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,295,161 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, but in order to give low-income and high risk borrowers access to home ownership, HUD and the GSEs began accepting "nontraditional" qualifications for approved loans in 1994 when Clinton and the Dem Congress rewrote the CRA.

As Mircea said, no fraud was committed by the loan originators, e.g. Mozilo at Countrywide, they were just functioning under their affordable housing agreements with HUD , etc. Where the fraud came in was when the GSEs bundled and sold the loans as MBS, not disclosing the "nontraditional" loan documentation and leaving the securities buyers thinking that the loans backing the MBS had met all traditional documentation requirements.

There have been no prosecutions of loan originators because the federal government was complicit. And there will be no prosecution of the GSEs' nondisclosure of adverse loan conditions because, again, the government was complicit.
No, Mozilo still signed off on inaccurate financial statements. Sarbanes/Oxley was supposed to have addressed that after Enron. One should note that he is guilty even if he was not aware that the statements were inaccurate. (he was).

That out of the way, you will note that many who worked for Countrywide tell the story about actual fraud outside of accepting non verifiable income. They changed contracts after the fact along with a whole list of other things that could not be described as anything but fraud.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:03 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,194 posts, read 44,965,842 times
Reputation: 13747
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
No, Mozilo still signed off on inaccurate financial statements. Sarbanes/Oxley was supposed to have addressed that after Enron. One should note that he is guilty even if he was not aware that the statements were inaccurate. (he was).
Look into this a little more carefully...
Quote:
"In its civil complaint, the SEC accuses Mozilo and two of his top lieutenants, former Countrywide Chief Operating Officer David Sambol and former Chief Financial Officer Eric Sieracki, of misleading investors about the risk underlying the billions in mortgages the company sold.
Which is EXACTLY what the GSEs did, as well.
Quote:
Mozilo's attorney, David Siegel... "The SEC's allegations are baseless," he said. "Mr. Mozilo acted properly and lawfully at all times."
And THIS is KEY:
Quote:
"Countrywide's investors, bondholders, rating agencies, and the financial industry were all well aware that mortgage lending practices were liberalized at Countrywide and almost all other financial institutions."
Inside the SEC Case Against Mozilo

LIBERALIZED. The government-initiated liberalized lending policies (nontraditional documentation) affected virtually every mortgage originator. AND a great many mortgages are bought from the originators, bundled, and resold as MBS by the GSEs. Trillions of dollars worth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
That out of the way, you will note that many who worked for Countrywide tell the story about actual fraud outside of accepting non verifiable income. They changed contracts after the fact along with a whole list of other things that could not be described as anything but fraud.
...to MEET the requirements in the deal they signed with HUD to provide affordable housing.

Given all of that and their own complicity... the government's solution to making it look like they were pursuing what everyone else would normally consider fraud was to settle with Mozilo for a ridiculously low fine (given the circumstances), say justice is done, and sweep their own complicity and guilt under the rug.

And how many of you fell for that?

Last edited by InformedConsent; 02-10-2013 at 11:14 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:20 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,295,161 times
Reputation: 17209
Yes, I agree that the government decided to not pursue the charges because they did not want to take the risk of what would be said in a trial.

They could have easily convicted Mozilo based upon the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,431,154 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by legoman View Post
Bankers create money out of thin air and loan it to you at interest.
You then have to pay the principle and interest back out of your work, blood, sweat, and tears.
This is nothing short of slavery.

Right now as we speak, the federal reserve (which is a privately owned corporation - owned by private central bankers), prints out of thin air $85 billion each month. They use this to purchase 'mortgage backed securities' and other bonds. Meanwhile the bankers pay themselves multi-million dollar bonuses.

You on the other hand must work much of your whole life to pay off your $300,000 mortgage.

This system is unsustainable and will collapse at some point.

Don't borrow....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:33 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,194 posts, read 44,965,842 times
Reputation: 13747
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Yes, I agree that the government decided to not pursue the charges because they did not want to take the risk of what would be said in a trial.

They could have easily convicted Mozilo based upon the law.
Which would have exposed the government's own complicity and guilt in violating the exact same law. That's why a Mozilo conviction on such never happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Alaska
7,527 posts, read 5,771,838 times
Reputation: 4909
Quote:
Originally Posted by legoman View Post
Bankers create money out of thin air and loan it to you at interest.
You then have to pay the principle and interest back out of your work, blood, sweat, and tears.
This is nothing short of slavery.

Right now as we speak, the federal reserve (which is a privately owned corporation - owned by private central bankers), prints out of thin e air $85 billion each month. They use this to purchase 'mortgage backed securities' and other bonds. Meanwhile the bankers pay themselves multi-million dollar bonuses.

You on the other hand must work much of your whole life to pay off your $300,000 mortgage.

This system is unsustainable and will collapse at some point.
Here's a simple solution. If you don't have the means to pay back a loan don't take one out. Other than that that I think you have Obammie and the Banks switched.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,200,586 times
Reputation: 21745
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Which would have exposed the government's own complicity and guilt in violating the exact same law. That's why a Mozilo conviction on such never happened.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Look into this a little more carefully...
Which is EXACTLY what the GSEs did, as well.
And THIS is KEY:Inside the SEC Case Against Mozilo

LIBERALIZED. The government-initiated liberalized lending policies (nontraditional documentation) affected virtually every mortgage originator. AND a great many mortgages are bought from the originators, bundled, and resold as MBS by the GSEs. Trillions of dollars worth.
...to MEET the requirements in the deal they signed with HUD to provide affordable housing.

Given all of that and their own complicity... the government's solution to making it look like they were pursuing what everyone else would normally consider fraud was to settle with Mozilo for a ridiculously low fine (given the circumstances), say justice is done, and sweep their own complicity and guilt under the rug.

And how many of you fell for that?
That would be the long and short of it. The government will never admit its guilt or complicity to anything.

I'm really curious to know why just a few banks ended up holding that debt -- and collapsed because of it. It smells like they were targeted.

Concurring...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 03:24 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,295,161 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossfire600 View Post
Here's a simple solution. If you don't have the means to pay back a loan don't take one out. Other than that that I think you have Obammie and the Banks switched.
Taxpayers never signed off on the billions in loans they are on the hook for paying back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top