Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Holding big banks accountable will bring in light how governent screwed things up. We all know government doesnt want to be reminded of their own failure, but we have people here asking for more of it.. Just like Democrats were asking for more mortgages, and even higher debt to equity rations in the early 2000's, and told everyone who tried to say an economic collapse would result that they were full of ****..
Holding big banks accountable will bring in light how governent screwed things up.
Stop it. It was (and is) a failure from both ends. It's completely dishonest to try and blame only one side of the equation no matter which side you want to blame.
Stop it. It was (and is) a failure from both ends. It's completely dishonest to try and blame only one side of the equation no matter which side you want to blame.
Ooh please.. thats like saying babies should be accountable for not deciding that candy is bad for them. Banks are under no obligation to protect the nation from an economic collapse.. Government is..
Culture of corruption in DOJ not limited to gun running.....
The bankers will not be held accountable by the Obama administration.The DOJ has let too many fraudsters stay on the street sans charges. Oh, and the most recent two are huge Obama donor-bundlers. Imagine that!
Now why do you think the Obama administration's DOJ is lackluster about going after bankers who steal depositors' money? Well, just look at their conflict of interest in the not too distant past.
Ooh please.. thats like saying babies should be accountable for not deciding that candy is bad for them. Banks are under no obligation to protect the nation from an economic collapse.. Government is..
But government was responsible for giving them a free reign.
Ooh please.. thats like saying babies should be accountable for not deciding that candy is bad for them. Banks are under no obligation to protect the nation from an economic collapse.. Government is..
If you want to remain viable it's called ethics. If your argument is that banks have absolutely no obligation to act ethical, you can own that arguement. It's not a very good one.
But government was responsible for giving them a free reign.
By nature of design, everyone has free reign, but there is a big difference between allowing people free reign, and actually encouraging unsafe activities which have future harmful actions in exchange for temporary relief from a problem.
Look at healthcare for example, government creates a problem, and then when that problem becomes even bigger, they create another program to deal with it. The mortgage industry was no different.. Democrats wanted more and more mortgages, and then shocked at the result..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Culture of corruption in DOJ not limited to gun running.....
