Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:31 AM
 
45,296 posts, read 26,553,744 times
Reputation: 25049

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas Joe View Post
If the union and the company agreed to such an arrangement, why is that anybody else's business? In a free market, labor and management are free to enter into any agreement that they want. I do not have a problem with PRIVATE unions. Public unions however should be restricted from political activity of any kind.
It's hardly a free market when the unionized workers have the brute force of the federal government to enforce their demands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Northern MN
3,869 posts, read 15,191,419 times
Reputation: 3614
They to are union members and it is in there contract.

Are you jealous that they get bonuses?

Why be outraged?
Jealousy?



Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
To be clear, I'm not talking about union members getting bonuses, I am talking about the employees of unions getting bonuses. Where is the outrage there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:52 AM
 
4,709 posts, read 12,695,223 times
Reputation: 3814
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioIstheBest View Post
Unions started in the United States to keep blacks and Asians out of the workforce.

They have been tied to the Mafia since the beginning.

40 hour work week was started in non-union shops. (Endicott-Johnson and Ford in the 1890s and early 1900s)

Health insurance for employees was started in non-union shops. Endicott-Johnson and defense contractors. 1890s and WW2)

Wages were rising in non-union manufacturing shops at much higher rates from 1860-1914 than after the unions started gaining power in the 30s. (50% from 1860-1890 and another 34% 1890-1914, adjusted for inflation).

Child labor in manufacturing was virtually eradicated by capitalists by 1920. But unions claim credit for getting rid of it by getting laws passed in 1937.

Unions are nothing more than racist mafia types that will lie, scam and cheat about anything to get money and power.

That's why they get bonuses.

Oh, so paying the workers in company scrip, redeemable only at the company store or to pay the rent on the company-owned shack, didn't have anything to do with it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:53 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,287,056 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
Because they're in the private sector and if they do a good job, they get bonuses. They are for profit entities and anyone of us is free to march away from these banks like I did, and go to a credit union.

My issue is that these employees are forced into these unions against their will, they pay dues and then the union employees get bonuses. I find it bizarre that non-profit, political entities, like unions get bonuses

Are Union bonuses tied to how many small businesses you can close down or something?
Why do you care what a union pays it's employees? If you're not a member of that union, then i don't see why it's any business of yours. Since you're so quick to defend corporate bonuses regardless of competency, i don't see why you should decide to raise your ethical standards now.

You're just whining because someone is getting a better deal than you. Go find a job that offers a bonus, and maybe you won't be so bitter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:54 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,287,056 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by snofarmer View Post
They to are union members and it is in there contract.

Are you jealous that they get bonuses?

Why be outraged?
Jealousy?
Pretty much hit the nail on the head.

The guy is mad because his half ass job won't pay him a bonus.

Typical right wing whining.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 10:00 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,335,372 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
To be clear, I'm not talking about union members getting bonuses, I am talking about the employees of unions getting bonuses. Where is the outrage there?
First thing you need to do is prove that unions even have enough paid employees for anyone to get their panties in a bunch over. A regional office covering thousands of workers might have 1-3 paid clerical workers and the top international/national negotiators and their clerical staff are paid, but all these people have worked their way up through the ranks of unpaid elected positions in local and regional union representation.

The second thing you need to prove is that the few paid employees that unions do have are getting unreasonable bonuses---or any bonuses all for that matter. I've never seen an documentation proving they do. I do know that Christmas bonuses at a regional official in my area, and their clerical worker, comes from volunteer collections from the membership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 10:08 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,335,372 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
It's hardly a free market when the unionized workers have the brute force of the federal government to enforce their demands.
Excuse me. But when federal workers unions negotiate their contracts, etc., they are negotiating against representatives of the federal government. They do NOT work in tantrum. Federal workers unions don't have the federal government "to enforce their demands!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,516,086 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by car54 View Post
Oh, so paying the workers in company scrip, redeemable only at the company store or to pay the rent on the company-owned shack, didn't have anything to do with it?
In some cases.

The vast majority of unions started top keep blacks and Asians form "taking" jobs from white people.

Look at immigration statistics from the late 1800s and early 1900s. Millions and millions of workers were leaving Europe to come to the U.S.

Europe was heavily unionized, the U.S. was less than 3% unionized. Europe had all kind of workplace laws, the U.S. didn't. But the workers were moving to the non-union U.S. If unions were so great these people would have never left.

This has always been true. Look where jobs are being created now. It aint in union states. The only expception is people from the South moving to Detroit in the 40s and 50s. Other than that workers always migrate to non-union areas.

That's all anyone needs to know about unions to see they are a joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,516,086 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Excuse me. But when federal workers unions negotiate their contracts, etc., they are negotiating against representatives of the federal government. They do NOT work in tantrum. Federal workers unions don't have the federal government "to enforce their demands!"
He was obviously talking about private sector unions.

And he is obviously correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 11:03 AM
 
45,296 posts, read 26,553,744 times
Reputation: 25049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Excuse me. But when federal workers unions negotiate their contracts, etc., they are negotiating against representatives of the federal government. They do NOT work in tantrum. Federal workers unions don't have the federal government "to enforce their demands!"
I was speaking of private sector unions, but you knew that.

When unionized public sector workers negotiate, its against all of us taxpayers who aren't in the employ of the biggest bully on the block...the federal government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top