Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2011, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
The government, like human beings, learns from its mistakes. Under Bush, I'm sure several statements were cleaned up for accuracy. After his innumerable gaffes, I would trust that this type of revision is pretty routine. Is there something sinister here? I think not. I always thought Lincoln was the first Republican president so perhaps that was what he meant to say.

If on the other hand, one or more of the government's tentacles cleaned up the truth (rather than a mistake) instead, altering it to be deliberately false, THEN we should be complaining...
One doesn't "clean up" a transcript.
You clean up your speech BEFORE you give it, especially when you are the President of the US and have the best and brightest speech writers at your disposal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2011, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,935,966 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
One doesn't "clean up" a transcript.
You clean up your speech BEFORE you give it, especially when you are the President of the US and have the best and brightest speech writers at your disposal.
Can you believe this is the lame excuse given?

You are right - transcripts ARE NOT cleaned up - they are supposed to be exactly what was said.

How can people not know this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Can you believe this is the lame excuse given?

You are right - transcripts ARE NOT cleaned up - they are supposed to be exactly what was said.

How can people not know this?
Must be our "fine" education system in America.
The dumbing down of America is almost complete wouldn't you say ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 11:54 AM
 
1,970 posts, read 1,761,198 times
Reputation: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Must be our "fine" education system in America.
The dumbing down of America is almost complete wouldn't you say ?
I was completed a while back, else why would so many have voted for Obama or Bush?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 12:23 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,608,641 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by highcotton View Post
PBS Alters Transcript To Hide Obama Gaffe

Such a gaffe would have brought huge amounts of ridicule and derision on George W. Bush, but in the case of Obama the media yawned.

Actually, they did more than yawn; government-funded PBS has altered the transcript of the President's speech, removing the offending comment.

Amazingly stupid liberal media...



They do it to their history programs constantly, why not a Presidential speech?


PBS =
Propaganda and Bull Sh*t
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 01:10 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,194,925 times
Reputation: 2661
Sorry guys you simply betraying your biases.

The PBS simply published that which was given out by the WH. They then updated when the WH did.

You have some reasonable proof this is not what happened?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,259,818 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecovlke View Post
That site has soooo many pop-ups. 'American Thinker" ROTFLMAO! Can you say oxyMORON?
Nice try at deflection. Poor but nice. I guess you know that the reason I am on this thread is to catch things like this to call others' attention to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,259,818 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo101 View Post
Isnt the "American Thinker" one of those satire websites where they just make up stories for entertainment purposes?..
I see that at least one lefty has accepted the story as told by PBS. Did you by any chance not listen to the speech that night. I did and I heard those words that are talked about in American Spectator. I should feel sorry for you but I just can't do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,259,818 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Can you believe this is the lame excuse given?

You are right - transcripts ARE NOT cleaned up - they are supposed to be exactly what was said.

How can people not know this?
Oh, they know but they can't afford to have the truth get too far out of hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2011, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,259,818 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by MORebelWoman View Post
I was completed a while back, else why would so many have voted for Obama or Bush?
I had to vote for Bush both times because of what was offered up against him. I promised myself that if the Dems offered any more socialists after they nominated McGovern I would vote for anyone else. I haven't seen one offering by them that wasn't a socialist since that year, 1972.

The warmer came close to winning because so many people thought Clinton was so good. BTW, I didn't vote for Clinton for the same reason as I skipped the rest. Now Jon Carry was too far left leaning and had lied so many times about Vietnam so I just had to go Bush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top