Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2011, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,205,470 times
Reputation: 6963

Advertisements

Great job (tunnel vision) by the Queen for America's anti-intellectuals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2011, 12:05 PM
 
8,432 posts, read 7,448,608 times
Reputation: 8793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
They took Jimmy Carter's 'Malign and Despair' speech that is generally regarded by everyone as a significant point in his loss of the presidency

That's not true. That is RW revisionism. Check my post above, or better yet, the historic record, for a more accurate account.
Naw, I saw the live broadcast of the speech on television. Jimmy Carter pretty much pointed out that the nation was in the doldrums and blamed it upon the citizenry for not doing better, for not being more upbeat, for not sacrificing more. Carter totally failed to lead the nation at that point. It was actually his major shortcoming and it was first exposed nationally with that speech. He needed to not just point out the problem but to also rally the people and point the way forward - he only pointed a finger.

It's a big reason why Reagan won the election - he was at the time perceived to be much more effective at rallying the people and pointing the way forward. Of course, whether Reagans' way forward was the correct way is still being debated today.

And for the record, I'm apparently one of those progressive/liberal/socialist/fascists that the more passionate conservatives on this forum rant against.

Last edited by djmilf; 07-16-2011 at 12:06 PM.. Reason: I mis-spelled 'fascists'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2011, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,008,891 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
The country is better off now than it was in the fall of 2008.
Every.single.economic.indicator is WORSE now under 2 1/2 years of obamanomics than in 2008.

But you go right ahead and repeat the mistake you made in 2008. We can only that the others who voted for this disaster have seen the light....and the facts and statistics that will tell them what a mistake they made.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2011, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,206,308 times
Reputation: 21745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
They are constantly cleaning up the messes left behind by their conservative predecessors:

- Lincoln in 1860 (crisis over slavery)
The Civil War was about economics and sovereignty, not slavery.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
- Teddy in 1900 (our first progressive president, stopped the Robber Barons, put in safety regulations for food and drugs, created Nat Pk system)
And then enslaved the Filipinos.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
- FDR in 1932 (saved us from Great Depression with Socialism-lite initiatives, support for Labor)
He caused the Great Depression to last longer, and had it not been for WW II, it would have lasted into the late 1940s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
- Clinton 1992 (Turned Reagan/Bush I debt into surplus)
No, he didn't. All he did was shuffle numbers on a spread sheet

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
- Obama in 2008 (Don't even get me started on the pile of Texas cow dung Obama got handed)
And he worsened things through his bad policies, expanded government and deficit spending.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
Carter was a tool in a lot of ways (very poor leadership skills), but he was right with that speech. He was trying to warn us that our wasteful spending...
By a House and Senate that had been controlled by Democrats since 1932.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
It was 16% inflation, oil embargos, and the Iran hostage crisis, and his own indecisiveness.
The 16% Real Inflation was caused by Democrats.

The oil embargo was over long before Carter even announced his candidacy to run in 1976.

The Hostage Crisis was his own doing. Had Carter followed the advice of Ambassador Smith and Army Chief of Staff Al Haig, Iran would be an ally today instead of an enemy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
America was at a crossroads in 1979. We could have tightened our belts, cut back on waste, and come up with a sensible energy policy.
But you didn't because a Democrat President, and a Democrat Senate and a Democrat House turned it into a nightmare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
On of the first things Saint Ronnie did was to symbolically remove the solar energy panels from the WH.
Which was excellent, since Democrats had misled Americans to believe that oil was used to produce electricity. It wasn't, and still isn't used to produce electricity in the US, so solar panels do nothing to affect oil use, in fact, solar panels use more oil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2011, 01:00 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,543,106 times
Reputation: 7472
You have to admit people were comparing Obama to Carter way before this tape was made.

Carter---people need to turn their AC down and stop being comfortable in their own homes.

Obama---people need to eat their peas and stop complaining.

Plus the gas prices look about the same.

Yep, Carter = Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2011, 01:48 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,339,376 times
Reputation: 3235
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Every.single.economic.indicator is WORSE now under 2 1/2 years of obamanomics than in 2008.

But you go right ahead and repeat the mistake you made in 2008. We can only that the others who voted for this disaster have seen the light....and the facts and statistics that will tell them what a mistake they made.
Go back and re-read what I wrote: unemployment was *technically* better then because the economy had not had time to sustain the shock of the financial system's collapse. But the jobs losses were accelerating at the end of 2008 and into the first month of 2009. The economy contracted sharply to the point of record deflation not seen since 1932 (a depression year that happened to be the last year of a republican's administration...what a coincidence).

But you know all that. You don't want to analyze facts in total, just the ones you like that support your argument. I guess have these types of 'debates' for sport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2011, 01:54 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,339,376 times
Reputation: 3235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
He caused the Great Depression to last longer, and had it not been for WW II, it would have lasted into the late 1940s.
Absolutely false. There is strong data to show that the economy was improved dramatically by 1937, a year in which he decided to slash government spending, which then resulted in the Roosevelt recession. As soon as he began spending again, the unemployment dropped and things gradually improved until WWII.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
And he worsened things through his bad policies, expanded government and deficit spending.
Yeah, and so what? By WWII's end the deficit was well beyond our national GDP - worse than the deficits we're running now. We probably wouldn't be running these deficits, of course, if the GOP would just accept a higher tax rate for people like Steve Forbes. Repubs don't care about the deficit at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2011, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,008,891 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by chickenfriedbananas View Post
Go back and re-read what I wrote: unemployment was *technically* better then because the economy had not had time to sustain the shock of the financial system's collapse. But the jobs losses were accelerating at the end of 2008 and into the first month of 2009. The economy contracted sharply to the point of record deflation not seen since 1932 (a depression year that happened to be the last year of a republican's administration...what a coincidence).

But you know all that. You don't want to analyze facts in total, just the ones you like that support your argument. I guess have these types of 'debates' for sport.
I did. You said the country is better off NOW than in 2008.

Hogwash.

The "facts in total" and "statistics in total" blow your premise out of the water.

The debt, deficit, gas, housing, UE, spending, taxes - all worse off now than in 2008.

Quote:
Absolutely false. There is strong data to show that the economy was improved dramatically by 1937, a year in which he decided to slash government spending, which then resulted in the Roosevelt recession. As soon as he began spending again, the unemployment dropped and things gradually improved until WWII.
Absolutely false and revisionist history. The evidence is clear - massive government spending prolonged the GD..

Last edited by sanrene; 07-16-2011 at 02:12 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2011, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,781,901 times
Reputation: 5691
Well, it is possible that Obama will be a one term president too, but I kind of doubt we will be able to crank up the old toss the regulations, cut taxes, and deregulate Reagan/Bushes machine this time. Been there, done that, and that's the problem. I am still waiting for that trickle down from the 1980s tax cuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2011, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,041,974 times
Reputation: 1464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
- Clinton 1992 (Turned Reagan/Bush I debt into surplus)
False

The national debt was no higher when Clinton left office than it was when he first moved in.

Quote:
One of the first things Saint Ronnie did was to symbolically remove the solar energy panels from the WH.
False

Unless the first thing he did took place in 1986, when the solar panels were actually removed:

Maine college to auction off former White House solar panels
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top