Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:14 AM
 
Location: Here
11,578 posts, read 13,952,362 times
Reputation: 7009

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
And then we allow them to buy guns and have a concealed deadly weapons permit.
Good thing it's impossible to get and carry a gun if you don't do it legally.

 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:16 AM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,290,858 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
The problem is we have several rights and privileges running into one another.

The shooter,up until he committed the shooting,was not legally barred from owning a firearm.

He also could not be forced to seek mental treatment.

He was,in hindsight, mentally unstable.

Even if treatment was freely available,unless society wants to force the mentally ill into treatment/institutions,there is little to be done.
Not in hindsight, read the articles in my previous post. There were people who knew about his condition, and did nothing.
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:16 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,875,929 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post

This is clearly a breakdown in the system. When you have teachers fearful of someone bringing automatic weapons to school and nothing is done, the system is fatally flawed.
What could have been done?

PErhaps anyone with a mental illness could be placed in an institution???
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:18 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,875,929 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
There were people who knew about his condition, and did nothing.
I worked once with a guy who was,in my opinion,mentally ill....

To the point I thought he probably was capable of violence(we actually did have a scuffle when he got TOO crazy one day) and he was let go...

But unless authorities can force someone who has broken no law to seek care,what is to be done???
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,028,329 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
What could have been done?

PErhaps anyone with a mental illness could be placed in an institution???
There are systems in place to put someone into treatment involuntarily. However, it is fraught with red tape and quite difficult to do. I think the parents, in this case, would have been in the best position to get the treatment necessary for this young man. Since I have no knowledge about their efforts, I cannot speak to whether they did or did not do so.

One thing is sure; there is a balance of rights, from medical and privacy concerns to should the mentally ill own weapons. It's not something that can be answered in a quick two second conversation but hopefully we can get off the mantra of which political persuasion this young man had and start having a conversation of what to do with these young people that are found to be suffering from mental illness and yet are so often not treated properly. Is this a failing of the institutional systems, the medical community, the parents or what?
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:24 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,875,929 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
I've followed all 137 pages of this thread from the very beginning. I have seen the reaction from some that immediately, before hardly any details were in, that wanted to blame the Tea Party, Beck, Fox, and especially Sarah Palin.

It was after this that I saw the reaction from right wing supporters to these types of statements. First, the reaction was all the facts are not known, let's wait. Next reaction was this is a disturbed young man, let's not bring politics into it. Finally, it was demonstrating that the left had employed similar rhetoric in political discussions. Finally, it was an effort to show that this young man was more aligned with the left than the right.

Look, the smart thing here would be to reserve and hold judgement until all of the facts are in. However, you cannot insult someone while doing so otherwise that is just begging for a response in kind.

Take a deep breath and decide if you're part of the problem or the solution. I think healthy debate is great but disparaging and insulting remarks are not.
I do believe that is what quite a few posters from the right tried to do,in the face of more and more leftist posters piling on that this was the fault of politicians from the right....
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:24 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
Anarchist, do not side with any political party.

ABC News reported Saturday night that Loughner had identified among his favorite books "The Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx, Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and the fiction classic "One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest" -- hardly the reading list of a Palin supporter.

Other clues have emerged about Loughner's persona from Arizona press reports:

  • He is "described by friends and former classmates as a loner, prone to dressing in black regalia of boots, trench coat and baggy pants even on the hottest days."
  • He was removed from Pima Community College "for causing disruptions in classrooms and the library, college officials said. His dispute with college officials led him to post a bizarre YouTube video declaring the college illegal under the U.S. Constitution and culminated in his suspension from campus."
  • His rants against the government that have surfaced on the Internet don't suggest he had a conservative perspective on big government. Instead Laughner's MySpace featured a photo "showing a close-up picture of an automatic handgun sitting atop a book or paper titled 'United States History.'" Another video shows a masked man burning the American flag.
  • "I can't trust the current government because of fabrications," Loughner wrote in a YouTube slideshow. "The government is implying mind control and brainwash on the people by controlling grammar."
  • Loughner suggests that he was rejected from entering the U.S. Army to which he applied because he was offered a "mini Bible" during the recruitment process, but that he declined to "write a belief on my Army application and the recruiter wrote on the application: None."
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:25 AM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,505,779 times
Reputation: 1775
It's disingenuous to pretend Palin's hunting metaphor was hate speech.

Currently, there's also no rational reason to believe Palin's speech was in any way related to the killings.

The only reason that a person would try to associate Palin with the killer is because they want to discredit her politically, and they are willing to do that off the backs of a dead 9 year old girl, a Judge, and a handful of other victims.

That's the most hateful speech I see in this whole affair.
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:27 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,875,929 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
There are systems in place to put someone into treatment involuntarily. However, it is fraught with red tape and quite difficult to do. I think the parents, in this case, would have been in the best position to get the treatment necessary for this young man. Since I have no knowledge about their efforts, I cannot speak to whether they did or did not do so.
He was an adult,did his parents have any legal say really?


Quote:
One thing is sure; there is a balance of rights, from medical and privacy concerns to should the mentally ill own weapons. It's not something that can be answered in a quick two second conversation but hopefully we can get off the mantra of which political persuasion this young man had and start having a conversation of what to do with these young people that are found to be suffering from mental illness and yet are so often not treated properly. Is this a failing of the institutional systems, the medical community, the parents or what?
That is what I was getting at,should the desire to be safe from violent mentally ill people mean those people do not have the same rights as others???
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:31 AM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,505,779 times
Reputation: 1775
The reason I pointed out the killer was a left winger was to discredit the idea that he killed because of something Palin or Beck had said.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top