Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Okay, ladies and gents . . . I am - no, have been - completely against tatoos. Completely. And ifs, ands or buts.
Last year in March, when my daughter was 6 months pregnant, we lost the baby. I watched him be born. I held him and rocked him for the first and last time. I was devastated. Fast forward to this past March. She and her husband each got a tatoo of the baby's footprints. I've been toying with the idea of asking if I could do the same, but then I wonder if I should just leave it the way it is - their baby, their way of remembering. I'm still not even sure I'd go through with it.
My condolences. We lost a baby in our family, too, so I know how awful it is. I think it would be nice to just leave the tattoo tribute to mom and dad. I know that there is jewelry available with finger prints, hand prints, or foot prints. I think something like that would be more appropriate for you.
Thanks, Kibbiekat. Yeah, I was thinking that I would really like something "to remember him by" (as if I'd ever forget, right?), but I also think the tattoo was their idea for them. I don't want to over-step my grandma-ness.
I am not against tattoos and have some myself, but in this instance I think you should just let the baby's parents have their own personal tribute and leave it at that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.