Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-12-2021, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Northern United States
824 posts, read 713,771 times
Reputation: 1495

Advertisements

A lot of the metro Detroit numbers are pretty interesting.

Hamtramck MI, a dense suburb surrounded by Detroit was estimated to lose drop from about 22,500 people to about 21,500 but instead grew to 28,500!

Dearborn MI was also predicted to lose about 5,000 people but gained 11,000!

Dearborn Heights was predicted to lose 2,000 but instead went from 57k to 62k.

Melvindale was estimated to lose about 500 people but gained 2,000 or so.

Redford Charter Township was predicted to lose about 1,500 but gained about 1,000 people.

Pretty much all of the inner-western suburbs of Detroit were predicted to lose population but instead gained a good amount of population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2021, 06:59 PM
 
16,702 posts, read 29,537,876 times
Reputation: 7676
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClevelandBrown View Post
The news wasn't all bad for Cleveland, when you look at the metro gained 11,000 people from 2010 (adjusted up 40,000 from the 2019 estimates, which is right where I expected).

Unfortunately, it appears like blacks are still leaving the eastside at big numbers. But it looks like mostly staying in the county. The inner east side suburbs that are roughly between 40 to 90 percent black all saw big adjustments up from the 2019 estimate, with the exception of East Cleveland which was adjusted down by 18 percent to under 14,000 (yikes).

But look at these and you see the areas where blacks are moving into:

Maple Heights - 22,078 projected; 23,701 actual; gain of 1,623

Garfield Heights - 27,448 projected; 29,781 actual; gain of 2,333

Euclid - 46,550 projected; 49,692 actual (just missed getting back over 50,000); gain of 3,142

Cleveland Heights - 43,992 projected; 45,312 actual; gain of 1,320

Shaker Heights - 27,027 projected; 29,439 actual; gain of 2,412

Bedford Heights - 10,460 projected; 11,020 actual; gain of 560

Bedford - 12,457 projected; 13,149 actual; gain of 692

Warrensville Heights - 13,108 projected; 13,789 actual; gain of 681

University Heights - 12,797 projected; 13,914 actual; gain of 1,117

Once I get more time, I want to add up Cleveland and all the inner suburbs and see how it compares to 2010, but I'm guessing it will be relatively unchanged. Overall, the county has stabilized outside of the ultra high crime areas on the eastside of Cleveland and the ultra high crime city of East Cleveland.

I adore all the “Heights” names in the Cleveland area…
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2021, 07:09 PM
 
Location: New York City
9,380 posts, read 9,344,945 times
Reputation: 6510
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdw1084 View Post
Top 10 most populous metros:

1) NYC: 20,140,470
2) LA: 13,200,988
3) CHI: 9,618,502
4) DAL: 7,637,387
5) HOU: 7,122,240
6) DC: 6,385,162
7) PHI: 6,245,051
8) MIA: 6,138,333
9) ATL: 6,089,815

10) BOS: 4,941,632

Top 5 Numerical Gains from 2010 to 2020:
DAL: +1,270,845
NYC: +1,243,361
HOU: +1,201,824
ATL: +803,087
DC: +735,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichiganderTexan View Post
Yes Miami and Atlanta should both surpass it within the next year or so. Philly had more people than the estimates expected.
While it will happen sooner or later, Philadelphia had impressive numbers, and held off Miami and Atlanta more than I thought. (And Atlanta will pass Miami first).

I remember reading several posts in the last 1-5 years about how Miami and Atlanta would blow Philadelphia away in the 2020 census. Proof that they were wrong, and clear that Philadelphia is a healthy and in-demand metro area.

(Good news for all, I was just making a small point )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2021, 07:16 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,174,498 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omahahonors View Post
Nebraska Major City Populations

2020 actual, 2019 estimates (in parenthesis), 2010 and num from 2010-2020 and % change.

Omaha 486,051 (478,192) 408,958 +77,093 18.85%
Lincoln 291,082 (289,102) 258,379 +32,703 12.65%
How much of that is attributed to annexation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2021, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, formerly NoVA and Phila
9,779 posts, read 15,795,280 times
Reputation: 10888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heel82 View Post
If your point is only that Fairfax is smaller than Wake, sure, that is true. If your point is Wake gained 230,000 people solely because it had more room, that is false. Raleigh alone, at less than half the size of Fairfax, gained roughly the same amount of people. There were other factors at play.
No, my point wasn't that Wake gained more people because it had more room. It was that Fairfax didn't gain a lot of people because it is pretty much out of room. People moving to NoVA are moving beyond Fairfax County because Fairfax is already built out. They have moved on to Loudoun, Prince William, and beyond. Loudoun went from 312k to 420k in ten years. That is phenomenal growth. Prince William went from 400k to 480k. Both grew more than Fairfax which is a much bigger population-wise (and closer-in) county because there really isn't much land left to build on in Fairfax. So while the population size is similar between Wake and Fairfax, Fairfax is really limited on how much more it can grow unless it starts to become more urban like neighboring Arlington and builds up (which is starting to happen in Tysons).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2021, 07:18 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,132 posts, read 7,575,946 times
Reputation: 5796
2020 Core Base Statistical Areas (CBSA)/MSA (16-30):

16. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metro Area
3,690,261 +10.7%

17. San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA Metro Area
3,298,634 +6.6%

18. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metro Area
3,175,275 +14.1%

19. Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO Metro Area
2,963,821 +16.5

20. Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD Metro Area
2,844,510 +4.9%

21. St. Louis, MO-IL Metro Area
2,820,253 +1.2%

22. Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL Metro Area
2,673,376 +25.3%

23. Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Metro Area
2,660,329 +18.6%

24. San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Metro Area
2,558,143 +19.4%

25. Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA Metro Area
2,512,859 +12.9%

26. Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA Metro Area
2,397,382 +11.6%

27. Pittsburgh, PA Metro Area
2,370,930 +0.6%

28. Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown, TX Metro Area
2,283,371 +33%

29. Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV Metro Area
2,265,461 +16.1%

30. Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN Metro Area
2,256,884 +5.6%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2021, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,435 posts, read 6,307,587 times
Reputation: 3827
Quote:
Originally Posted by HouTXmetro View Post
Had it not been for Harvey, Houston Metro area could have arguably numerically outgrown Dallas/Fort Worth in raw numbers as well.
There was still somewhat of a wide gap to fill, plus the O&G market fluctuations not related to Harvey have played a big part as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2021, 07:24 PM
 
Location: Atlanta metro (Cobb County)
3,162 posts, read 2,215,339 times
Reputation: 4225
Quote:
Originally Posted by DabOnEm View Post
For sure and these are also areas many of the people from rural areas are moving to. Anything over 100k is going to feel like a big city if you're coming from a town of less than 10,000. On the flip side, depending on how much WFH is here to stay I think many of these small towns that are less than two hours from a major city will start to grow again and gain more amenities. They have to be in economically strong areas or states but I can see it happening.
In order to attract many remote "knowledge workers", small towns are going to need (at a bare minimum) such amenities as high speed internet, grocery stores with a good selection, schools that offer a quality educational experience that is up to date with 21st century standards, and attractive recreational facilities. I'm sure some communities will evolve in such a direction in the 2020s and beyond but many will fall short and continue to languish.

For those without pre-existing ties in such places, it's hard to see people choosing rural west Tennessee over suburban Nashville, for example, or an agricultural community in central Nebraska over the Omaha area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2021, 07:26 PM
 
1,073 posts, read 2,195,893 times
Reputation: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
How much of that is attributed to annexation?

Well the Omaha metro area grew over 100,000 people and there are 110,000 people in unincorporated suburbs in Douglas county. Omaha's annexation is similar to Texas, but not as liberal. Omaha cannot go past county lines and cannot take in communities of more than 10k. In many states, these cities can do both.

That said. Omaha annexed enough neighborhoods to gain 32k people. 45k new people have moved into the city in the form of infill projects
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2021, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Northeast states
14,055 posts, read 13,942,709 times
Reputation: 5198
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpomp View Post
While it will happen sooner or later, Philadelphia had impressive numbers, and held off Miami and Atlanta more than I thought. (And Atlanta will pass Miami first).

I remember reading several posts in the last 1-5 years about how Miami and Atlanta would blow Philadelphia away in the 2020 census. Proof that they were wrong, and clear that Philadelphia is a healthy and in-demand metro area.

(Good news for all, I was just making a small point )
Miami will pass Philly metro area population within 2 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top