Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:39 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,499,977 times
Reputation: 4799

Advertisements

The Tax Foundation - McCain and Obama Both Play Loose with Facts on Tax Issues in First Debate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:39 AM
 
4,814 posts, read 3,850,925 times
Reputation: 1120
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
where in the article is the word fear used? It does say prefer. Quite different to the educated reader.
This part of the article did use the word "fear".


Quote:
Moreover, 74 percent of the executives say they fear that an Obama presidency would be disastrous for the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:40 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,499,977 times
Reputation: 4799
One of the biggest challenges facing both John McCain and Barack Obama in their commitment to provide tax relief to working-class Americans is the simple fact that millions of them already pay no personal income taxes. According to the most recent IRS statistics for 2006, some 45.6 million tax filers—one-third of all filers—have no tax liability after taking their credits and deductions. For good or ill, this is a dramatic 57 percent increase since 2000 in the number of Americans who pay no personal income taxes.


The Tax Foundation - Both Candidates' Tax Plans Will Reduce Millions of Taxpayers' Liability to Zero (or Less)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:41 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,499,977 times
Reputation: 4799
The Tax Foundation - Comparing International Corporate Tax Rates: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate Increasingly Out of Line by Various Measures

The U.S. has left the major features of its business tax system unchanged over the past fifteen years. Meanwhile, other countries have been changing theirs, potentially hurting the competitiveness of the United States. Perhaps most emblematic of the trend abroad is lower corporate tax rates in virtually all developed nations. As a result, the United States now has the second-highest statutory tax rate among OECD member nations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:42 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,499,977 times
Reputation: 4799
The Tax Foundation - The 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief: The Benefit of Lower Tax Rates

Summary Recent research on President Bush's tax relief in 2001 and 2003 has found that the lower tax rates induced taxpayers to report more taxable income. In particular, the reduction in the top two tax rates induced taxpayers to report more taxable income—an increase in the size of the tax base—to such an extent that this positive behavioral response likely offset roughly 25 percent to 40 percent of the static revenue loss of lowering the top two tax rates. This research illustrates that, while the lower tax rates have not paid for themselves, they do provide important economic benefits and can expand the tax base to such an extent that they cost the federal government substantially less revenue than the casual observer might think. Moreover, this research may provide valuable insights into the harmful effects of high tax rates as the Presidential candidates' tax plans are evaluated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:42 AM
 
4,814 posts, read 3,850,925 times
Reputation: 1120
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
One of the biggest challenges facing both John McCain and Barack Obama in their commitment to provide tax relief to working-class Americans is the simple fact that millions of them already pay no personal income taxes. According to the most recent IRS statistics for 2006, some 45.6 million tax filers—one-third of all filers—have no tax liability after taking their credits and deductions. For good or ill, this is a dramatic 57 percent increase since 2000 in the number of Americans who pay no personal income taxes.


The Tax Foundation - Both Candidates' Tax Plans Will Reduce Millions of Taxpayers' Liability to Zero (or Less)
Adding to your link.

]How Do the Presidential Candidates Tax Plans Affect Taxpayers Marginal Tax Rates?

The Presidential candidates have proposed comprehensive tax plans that reshape tax policy in important ways. The two candidates have put forward two very different visions, with Senator Obama's tax plan emphasizing redistribution and Senator McCain's tax plan focusing more on economic growth. A perhaps neglected aspect of their tax plans is how they alter effective marginal tax rates, the amount of tax that people pay out of their last dollar of income.

The major findings include:

* To the surprise of some, even though Senator Obama's tax plan lowers taxes for the bottom four quintiles, marginal tax rates would fall only for the very lowest-income couples. Taking both income and payroll taxes into account, those at the very bottom of the income distribution would see their effective marginal tax rates fall from 27.4 percent to minus 58.6 percent due to proposed changes to the earned income tax credit and Senator Obama's new "Making Work Pay" credit.

* Most low- and moderate-income couples would see their effective marginal tax rates rise, in some cases, significantly. Indeed, some low- and moderate-income taxpayers will see their marginal rates rise to more than 50 percent.

* High-income taxpayers can also expect their effective marginal tax rates to rise—to 47.2 percent-under Senator Obama's tax plan. This increase is caused by rolling back the 2001 and 2003 reductions in the top two tax rates, curtailing deductions and exemptions at high income levels, and potentially raising Social Security taxes.

* Senator McCain's tax plan also changes marginal tax rates. His proposal to replace the exclusion for employer-based health insurance with a new health tax credit boosts taxpayers' taxable incomes by their health insurance premiums which generally pushes taxpayers into higher tax brackets, but not to as great an extent as Senator Obama's tax plan.

The Tax Foundation - How Do the Presidential Candidates’ Tax Plans Affect Taxpayers’ Marginal Tax Rates?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:44 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,499,977 times
Reputation: 4799
The Tax Foundation - Obama’s Income Tax Cliff for Senior Citizens

In recent months the Presidential candidates have been busy crafting and promoting their tax plans. In an effort to reduce the tax burden on America's seniors, Barack Obama has said that he will eliminate all income taxation for senior citizens making less than $50,000 per year. Putting aside the debate on whether this is a good policy, it might be worth exploring how such a policy would be implemented. It sounds simple enough: if you're a senior and your income is less than $50,000, then you don't pay income taxes (note that the threshold is for total income, which is greater than taxable income). But what happens when your income crosses that threshold? Obama's plan does not address this question, and it turns out to be an important question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:45 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,499,977 times
Reputation: 4799
Fax folks fax.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:47 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,499,977 times
Reputation: 4799
The Tax Foundation - U.S. Corporate Taxes Now 50 Percent Higher than OECD Average
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
8,882 posts, read 19,871,534 times
Reputation: 3920
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfgod View Post
"Chief Executive Magazine"; sounds like an ego magazine for the "CEO"s of every "Mary Sue Jones Avon Products" and "Billy Bobs Mortgages and Storm Door Installers". This might be a useful poll if we knew the market capitalization, number of employees and net income of the "corporations" that these titans of industry oversee.

I've started, operated and sold 4 business in my life, not counting the one I still operate. I've NEVER called myself a CEO, or any other fancy title, nor have I ever heard of this magazine.

golfgod
Precisely. I visit a lot of business owners through my work and I've NEVER seen CEO Magazine on anyone's shelf, coffee table or desk. Fast Company maybe. Gimme a break CEO Magazine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top