Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-22-2009, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Holly Springs, NC USA
3,457 posts, read 4,670,386 times
Reputation: 1907

Advertisements

I don't think this has been posted yet:

TheHill.com

The Obama presidency: Here comes socialism
By Dick Morris
Posted: 01/20/09 06:12 PM [ET]
2009-2010 will rank with 1913-14, 1933-36, 1964-65 and 1981-82 as years that will permanently change our government, politics and lives. Just as the stars were aligned for Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson and Reagan, they are aligned for Obama. Simply put, we enter his administration as free-enterprise, market-dominated, laissez-faire America. We will shortly become like Germany, France, the United Kingdom, or Sweden — a socialist democracy in which the government dominates the economy, determines private-sector priorities and offers a vastly expanded range of services to many more people at much higher taxes.

Obama will accomplish his agenda of “reform” under the rubric of “recovery.” Using the electoral mandate bestowed on a Democratic Congress by restless voters and the economic power given his administration by terrified Americans, he will change our country fundamentally in the name of lifting the depression. His stimulus packages won’t do much to shorten the downturn — although they will make it less painful — but they will do a great deal to change our nation.

In implementing his agenda, Barack Obama will emulate the example of Franklin D. Roosevelt. (Not the liberal mythology of the New Deal, but the actuality of what it accomplished.) When FDR took office, he was enormously successful in averting a total collapse of the banking system and the economy. But his New Deal measures only succeeded in lowering the unemployment rate from 23 percent in 1933, when he took office, to 13 percent in the summer of 1937. It never went lower. And his policies of over-regulation generated such business uncertainty that they triggered a second-term recession. Unemployment in 1938 rose to 17 percent and, in 1940, on the verge of the war-driven recovery, stood at 15 percent. (These data and the real story of Hoover’s and Roosevelt’s missteps, uncolored by ideology, are available in The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes, copyright 2007.)

But in the name of a largely unsuccessful effort to end the Depression, Roosevelt passed crucial and permanent reforms that have dominated our lives ever since, including Social Security, the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, unionization under the Wagner Act, the federal minimum wage and a host of other fundamental changes.

Obama’s record will be similar, although less wise and more destructive. He will begin by passing every program for which liberals have lusted for decades, from alternative-energy sources to school renovations, infrastructure repairs and technology enhancements. These are all good programs, but they normally would be stretched out for years. But freed of any constraint on the deficit — indeed, empowered by a mandate to raise it as high as possible — Obama will do them all rather quickly.

But it is not his spending that will transform our political system, it is his tax and welfare policies. In the name of short-term stimulus, he will give every American family (who makes less than $200,000) a welfare check of $1,000 euphemistically called a refundable tax credit. And he will so sharply cut taxes on the middle class and the poor that the number of Americans who pay no federal income tax will rise from the current one-third of all households to more than half. In the process, he will create a permanent electoral majority that does not pay taxes, but counts on ever-expanding welfare checks from the government. The dependency on the dole, formerly limited in pre-Clinton days to 14 million women and children on Aid to Families with Dependent Children, will now grow to a clear majority of the American population.

Will he raise taxes? Why should he? With a congressional mandate to run the deficit up as high as need be, there is no reason to raise taxes now and risk aggravating the depression. Instead, Obama will follow the opposite of the Reagan strategy. Reagan cut taxes and increased the deficit so that liberals could not increase spending. Obama will raise spending and increase the deficit so that conservatives cannot cut taxes. And, when the economy is restored, he will raise taxes with impunity, since the only people who will have to pay them would be rich Republicans.

In the name of stabilizing the banking system, Obama will nationalize it. Using Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to write generous checks to needy financial institutions, his administration will demand preferred stock in exchange. Preferred stock gets dividends before common stockholders do. With the massive debt these companies will owe to the government, they will only be able to afford dividends for preferred stockholders — the government, not private investors. So who will buy common stock? And the government will demand that its bills be paid before any profits that might materialize are reinvested in the financial institution, so how will the value of the stocks ever grow? Devoid of private investors, these institutions will fall ever more under government control.

Obama will begin the process by limiting executive compensation. Then he will urge restructuring and lowering of home mortgages in danger of default (as the feds have already done with Citibank).

Then will come guidance on the loans to make and government instructions on the types of enterprises to favor. God grant that some Blagojevich type is not in charge of the program, using his power to line his pockets. The United States will find itself with an economic system comparable to that of Japan, where the all-powerful bureaucracy at MITI (Ministry of International Trade and Industry) manages the economy, often making mistakes like giving mainframe computers priority over the development of laptops.

But it is the healthcare system that will experience the most dramatic and traumatic of changes. The current debate between erecting a Medicare-like governmental single payer or channeling coverage through private insurance misses the essential point. Without a lot more doctors, nurses, clinics, equipment and hospital beds, health resources will be strained to the breaking point. The people and equipment that now serve 250 million Americans and largely neglect all but the emergency needs of the other 50 million will now have to serve everyone. And, as government imposes ever more Draconian price controls and income limits on doctors, the supply of practitioners and equipment will decline as the demand escalates. Price increases will be out of the question, so the government will impose healthcare rationing, denying the older and sicker among us the care they need and even barring them from paying for it themselves. (Rationing based on income and price will be seen as immoral.)

And Obama will move to change permanently the partisan balance in America. He will move quickly to legalize all those who have been in America for five years, albeit illegally, and to smooth their paths to citizenship and voting. He will weaken border controls in an attempt to hike the Latino vote as high as he can in order to make red states like Texas into blue states like California. By the time he is finished, Latinos and African-Americans will cast a combined 30 percent of the vote. If they go by top-heavy margins for the Democrats, as they did in 2008, it will assure Democratic domination (until they move up the economic ladder and become good Republicans).

And he will enact the check-off card system for determining labor union representation, repealing the secret ballot in union elections. The result will be to raise the proportion of the labor force in unions up to the high teens from the current level of about 12 percent.

Finally, he will use the expansive powers of the Federal Communications Commission to impose “local” control and ownership of radio stations and to impose the “fairness doctrine” on talk radio. The effect will be to drive talk radio to the Internet, fundamentally change its economics, and retard its growth for years hence.

But none of these changes will cure the depression. It will end when the private sector works through the high debt levels that triggered the collapse in the first place. And, then, the large stimulus package deficits will likely lead to rapid inflation, probably necessitating a second recession to cure it.

So Obama’s name will be mud by 2012 and probably by 2010 as well. And the Republican Party will make big gains and regain much of its lost power.

But it will be too late to reverse the socialism of much of the economy, the demographic change in the electorate, the rationing of healthcare by the government, the surge of unionization and the crippling of talk radio.

Morris, a former adviser to Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and President Bill Clinton, is the author of Outrage. To get all of Dick Morris’s and Eileen McGann’s columns for free by email, go to DickMorris.com. To order a signed copy of their new best-selling book, Fleeced, go to dickmorris.com.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-22-2009, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,252 posts, read 64,669,808 times
Reputation: 73946
Mmmmm...back when he was campaigning, I might have agreed with you (b/c that is basically what he was saying), but now he seems to be reneging on most everything. Plus, I don't think it takes a genius to realize that raising taxes on anyone or more government spending in this economy is a bad idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,048 posts, read 34,750,991 times
Reputation: 10623
Right there in the first paragraph of the article is all the information you need. He lists four different time periods, then asserts that the United States is about to become "...like Germany, France, the United Kingdom or Sweden." Have we become like these countries before?

It's old hat to scream and yell that Franklin Roosevelt was a Socialist. Yet somehow, the United States of America didn't quite become the Socialist States of America in the 1930s, which leads me to think that it isn't going to happen in 2009, either. The whole article is just a lot of ranting and raving by someone who didn't particularly want Obama to win the election. Well, guess what, Dick Morris? He did! Live with it. And if becoming a socialist nation is the worst thing in the world, nobody is being held here against their will. There must be other countries in the world with systems more amenable to the permanently disgruntled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Denver, Colorado U.S.A.
14,164 posts, read 27,358,347 times
Reputation: 10428
Yeah, that free-enterprise, market-dominated, laissez-faire experiment worked so well the past 8 years, why would we change it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,260 posts, read 21,863,580 times
Reputation: 10455
What conservatives don't understand is that since free market abuses cause regulation and socialist notions such regulation and socialist notions are an inherant part of----THE FREE MARKET.

Anyway an unregulated market and pure capitalism (if such a thing even exists) simply isn't on the table. The conservatives can have regulated capitalism with a little socialism or we can go direct to real socialism or maybe communism. Anyway that's the real choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,458 posts, read 60,037,264 times
Reputation: 24868
What we had in the last 8 years was about as far from “a free-enterprise, market-dominated, laissez-faire experiment...." as it is possible to get. What we had was state socialism for the investor class. BTY - from their, at least the ones that went into cash before the crash, it was a resounding and profitable success.

Added: Dick Morris (quoted in OP), except for his nonsense about a recovery of Republican Party power, pretty much described a Utopia as far as I am concerned. I also think Morris does not have any idea about how many students will want to become medical doctors instead of administrators under universal national single payer health care. We will not have a shortage, finally, of health services.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Denver, Colorado U.S.A.
14,164 posts, read 27,358,347 times
Reputation: 10428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
What conservatives don't understand is that since free market abuses cause regulation and socialist notions such regulation and socialist notions are an inherant part of----THE FREE MARKET.

Anyway an unregulated market and pure capitalism (if such a thing even exists) simply isn't on the table. The conservatives can have regulated capitalism with a little socialism or we can go direct to real socialism or maybe communism. Anyway that's the real choice.
Exactly!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,532,224 times
Reputation: 4186
Western Europe is not socialist, contra Mr. Morris's silly claims. We are not going to be socialist any time soon either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 01:43 PM
 
31,384 posts, read 37,213,359 times
Reputation: 15038
Dick Morris, is now, and has always been an idiot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Holly Springs, NC USA
3,457 posts, read 4,670,386 times
Reputation: 1907
An idiot who makes some fairly lucid comments - wonder what that makes most of the liberal sheep on this board then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top