Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-27-2008, 05:51 AM
 
Location: Home is where the heart is
15,402 posts, read 28,982,899 times
Reputation: 19090

Advertisements

In just a few more weeks, we'll see another "first" for Obama.

Obama will accept the Democratic nomination in a nearby football stadium, not in the convention hall.

Which brings up some interesting questions:

1. What happens if Hillary manages to pull the rug out from under him? Will she make a victory march to the stadium?

2. Will this be the beginning of a new trend--will we be seeing future candidates make acceptance speeches from all sorts of places? A stadium is a nice start, but think of the pr potential if an acceptance speech is given in front of an abandoned building--or a nuclear power plant--or whatever symbolizes a major cause in the upcoming campaign.

3. One big problem with conventions has been too much media coverage. Conventions used to be a place where party officials met and made decisions. But since the tv cameras arrived, they've become nothing but scripted, meaningless parties. Maybe if they take the speech, and all the balloons, and the party offsite, all the news cameras will follow... which means the convention could be a useful and important part of the political process again.

Thoughts?

ps. Actually, this isn't the first offsite acceptance--John F. Kennedy also delivered his acceptance speech off-site. But that was a different circumstance. Kennedy arrived at his convention uncertain of success, and chose to go across the street as part of a last minute decision. Obama's stadium speech, OTOH, is a deliberate choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-27-2008, 06:21 AM
 
Location: Alvarado, TX
2,917 posts, read 4,772,820 times
Reputation: 802
The audacity of a pipe dream! LOL, ROTF, LMAO!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 06:28 AM
 
31,689 posts, read 41,097,059 times
Reputation: 14434
Why?

So it can be given in front of the people who voted for him and not just the party that nominated him.
The symbolism of that may well outweigh any negative assertions that it was the party who gave him the nomination. Does it give the supporters of Obama the opportunity to be there in far greater numbers then some angry still wet hens? Thats what you call thinking ahead and another example of strategic planning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 06:30 AM
 
27,219 posts, read 46,821,519 times
Reputation: 15668
Quote:
Originally Posted by normie View Post
In just a few more weeks, we'll see another "first" for Obama.

Obama will accept the Democratic nomination in a nearby football stadium, not in the convention hall.

Which brings up some interesting questions:

1. What happens if Hillary manages to pull the rug out from under him? Will she make a victory march to the stadium?

2. Will this be the beginning of a new trend--will we be seeing future candidates make acceptance speeches from all sorts of places? A stadium is a nice start, but think of the pr potential if an acceptance speech is given in front of an abandoned building--or a nuclear power plant--or whatever symbolizes a major cause in the upcoming campaign.

3. One big problem with conventions has been too much media coverage. Conventions used to be a place where party officials met and made decisions. But since the tv cameras arrived, they've become nothing but scripted, meaningless parties. Maybe if they take the speech, and all the balloons, and the party offsite, all the news cameras will follow... which means the convention could be a useful and important part of the political process again.

Thoughts?

ps. Actually, this isn't the first offsite acceptance--John F. Kennedy also delivered his acceptance speech off-site. But that was a different circumstance. Kennedy arrived at his convention uncertain of success, and chose to go across the street as part of a last minute decision. Obama's stadium speech, OTOH, is a deliberate choice.
Maybe there will be a beer festival just like in Germany (that is the reason why so many people showed up, Germans love beer ), and on the other occasion when Obama was speaking to 75.000 people, there was a concert going on...most media were not reporting on that, so it looks like they all cam for Obama...neither did they report on the fact that many people in Tampa were mad when attending the Obama..., many personal items were taking without notice before hand of not being allowed to bring in. This was only written in the local news paper. More so because other nominees never demanded this procedure. With Obama it is all scripted from who is sitting behind him to the flag pin and the rest of his nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 06:31 AM
 
31,689 posts, read 41,097,059 times
Reputation: 14434
Normie, he also made arraingements for the stadium without Pelosi and Reed knowing. That makes me think the lease is in his campaigns name. It that is the case I doubt if they would let Hillary use it. That would be a symbolic reminder that with her the Democrats are facing the Republican war chest broke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 07:01 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,210,040 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by normie View Post
In just a few more weeks, we'll see another "first" for Obama.

Obama will accept the Democratic nomination in a nearby football stadium, not in the convention hall.

Which brings up some interesting questions:

1. What happens if Hillary manages to pull the rug out from under him? Will she make a victory march to the stadium?
Oh, God, yes! Please!!! I'll be laughing for four years - it wont matter who the president is!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,011,457 times
Reputation: 7118
They want the optics, the visuals, the imagery so they can convince the electorate he's THE ONE.

And also to drown out any protests from Hillary supporters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 08:46 AM
 
31,689 posts, read 41,097,059 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
They want the optics, the visuals, the imagery so they can convince the electorate he's THE ONE.

And also to drown out any protests from Hillary supporters.
Exactly and the Hillary supporters might not even be able to get in. Depending how tickets are distributed. Strategic and ahead of events planning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2008, 06:34 AM
 
Location: Home is where the heart is
15,402 posts, read 28,982,899 times
Reputation: 19090
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Hillary supporters might not even be able to get in. Depending how tickets are distributed.
Tickets are going to be distributed to anyone who can show proof of doing volunteer work for the DNC (not necessarily Obama campaign). If you are not a resident of Colorado, you must sign up through a local campaign or Democratic Party offices.

Residents of Colorado will have a few other options besides showing proof of volunteering for the DNC. Tickets given as awards for educational achievement--that sort of thing. A “significant percentage” of the tickets are reserved for Denver residents, in particular.

There is talk of having some tickets available online--I don't know how that would work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2008, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Home is where the heart is
15,402 posts, read 28,982,899 times
Reputation: 19090
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Oh, God, yes! Please!!! I'll be laughing for four years - it wont matter who the president is!
LOL, It would be a classic moment in political history, that's for sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Maybe if they take the speech, and all the balloons, and the party offsite, all the news cameras will follow... which means the convention could be a useful and important part of the political process again.
This is the big reason I'm all for having the speech off site. The dnc needs to get some work done this convention, but every election the media coverage of the acceptance speech gets in the way of mundane things like holding meetings.

I really want to see the primary system revamped. So..... do us a favor, Barack. Take the tv cameras and the crowd and the balloons and the hoopla somewhere else so we can get some work done!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top