Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You said NOTHING about 2008? Then why did you mention it in your original post? I mean, come on...it was only a few minutes ago.....
What makes you think those kids that were not old enough in 2008 to vote were still to young to vote in 2010? You never put an age range....Unless you were talking about a 14-15 year old, that will now be able to vote this year....but the 16-17 year old very well could have voted in 2010....
You need to go back and follow along again. I said that there are young people that will be voting for the first time in this election because they were not old enough to vote in 2008... SOMEONE ELSE said those people voted in 2010. That is where I said that there were people who were 16 and 17 years old in 2010 that could not vote in the mid-terms, but can vote in this election. You are combining two totally different things to try and quote me on something I clearly did not say.
i am in florida and things look pretty good for romney here.
maybe the south is tired of all the liberal "southerners live in trailer parks with no teeth" remarks.
Of course they do. Seniors always go for the repubs. And even with the changes of Medicare to a voucher system....it won't affect them so what do they care. My dad is a senior in Fl who has always voted repub. He could care less what they do to Medicare because it doesn't affect him. He proudly voted for McCain but is sitting out this election. He thinks Romney has no sense at all and is just plain stupid lol He is 91 and we have great political discussions. He can't stand Obama but thinks he'll win.
Again, I was talking about the voters who were not eligible to vote in 2010.
THIS is what I said: "You think they ALL voted in 2010 in a mid-term election?
Even the ones who were 16 or 17 at the time?"
Is this quote below you or not?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringTheContent
Oh yeah? And what about all of the new voters who will be going to the polls for the first time in November? The people who were too young to vote in 2008? Who do you suppose they are going to vote for... Romney? LOL, yeah, the kids love Romney! There are going to be plenty of new Obama voters. You don't hear anything about them because you are too busy burying your head in the sand.
I love the desperation coming out of Obama's drones these days.
Say, if the election is a foregone conclusion for Obama, why are you wasting your time on the "Elections" board?
Tell your supervisor at Obama for America that your "talents" would be better spent stuffing envelopes at campaign HQ. You're not persuasive here.
Lol, you cannot even get the name right, it is ORGANIZING FOR AMERICA, not Obama for America. FYI, there is not envelop stuffing dude, door to door contacts and phone calling is the bulk of the business. About 4,000,000 contacts in Ohio this month alone.
You are taking that and combining it with a completely different quote when you say that I was implying that people from 2008 have "stayed 16 and 17"
What I have been saying is that there are people who will be voting for the first time that did not vote in 2008, and they will not be voting for Romney. The other person said those people voted in 2010. I said the people who were 16 and 17 AT THAT TIME -- 2010 -- did not vote in the elections of -- 2010 --. Those people are 18 and 19 now, they will be voting, and they will be voting for President Obama. Time to move on now...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.