Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What does Eureka have that is attracting newcomers? Isn't the vaunted local weed crop declining in value what with states legalizing local sales and grow operations?
What does Eureka have that is attracting newcomers? Isn't the vaunted local weed crop declining in value what with states legalizing local sales and grow operations?
It's cool, it's close to the coast, and it's cheap.
Smart people, those Californians, relocating because it improves their financial situation.
They should be required to compensate existing residents who they harm financially. Ironic that as California homeowners, they voted to protect themselves from higher property taxes driven by increased demand (Prop 13) and now they're moving to a new place where they are displacing with impunity longtime residents.
They should be required to compensate existing residents who they harm financially. Ironic that as California homeowners, they voted to protect themselves from higher property taxes driven by increased demand (Prop 13) and now they're moving to a new place where they are displacing with impunity longtime residents.
Just when I thought your post couldn't get any nuttier, you come up with this gem. There are no words.
They should be required to compensate existing residents who they harm financially. Ironic that as California homeowners, they voted to protect themselves from higher property taxes driven by increased demand (Prop 13) and now they're moving to a new place where they are displacing with impunity longtime residents.
LOL, I'm pretty sure the existing residents in my neighborhood are thrilled that I moved from CA and paid more for my house than they did, I raised their comps.
Prop 13 passed in 1978, those voters are probably gone or retired by now.
They should be required to compensate existing residents who they harm financially. Ironic that as California homeowners, they voted to protect themselves from higher property taxes driven by increased demand (Prop 13) and now they're moving to a new place where they are displacing with impunity longtime residents.
You're not being harmed. They take nothing from you. Nothing.
And before you chime in - having to pay more because of the market, or life, or the stars being aligned a certain way, is not being "harmed". In fact, those longtime residents are actually being benefited, with higher selling prices and rental incomes.
Just when I thought your post couldn't get any nuttier, you come up with this gem. There are no words.
It is just as nutty as Prop 13: people voting to insulate themselves from costs driven by increased demand.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
