Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-01-2019, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Manchester
3,110 posts, read 2,916,899 times
Reputation: 3728

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRnative View Post
This is egregiously wrong.

Gordon Park north of I-90 on the lakeshore is now part of the Cleveland Metroparks Lakefront Reservation, which incorporates many formerly individual Cleveland city parks along Lake Erie, and so Gordon Park has lost much of its individual identity. What the City of Cleveland today calls Gordon Park is 46 acres south of I-90.

The Metroparks mostly promote the East 72nd St. fishing wall, boat launch and picnic area, and the Lakefront Bikeway, not identifying these amenities as Gordon Park, but this is just the part of Gordon Park north of I-90. Does Pittsburgh have any parks with fishing walls? Gordon Park north of I-90 also is the home of the Inter City Yacht Club, an African American marina and yacht club.

What is a fishing wall? Is it just that stone lake edge where people can stand and fish?

If so, yes we have a places where you can stand and fish in Pittsburgh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2019, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh (via Chicago, via Pittsburgh)
3,887 posts, read 5,519,793 times
Reputation: 3107
Quote:
Originally Posted by PghYinzer View Post
What is a fishing wall? Is it just that stone lake edge where people can stand and fish?

If so, yes we have a places where you can stand and fish in Pittsburgh.
I’m guessing that’s what they are alluding to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2019, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,353 posts, read 17,022,283 times
Reputation: 12406
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
To overgeneralize, household size might have taken a city down 1/3. If a city dropped by 2/3, the other half would be fewer households -- 50% fewer.
Not true for Pittsburgh at least. I did the math years back, and if it gained approximately 110,000 people it would have the same number of households today as it did in 1950.

A fair amount of the household density was "planned loss" as well - things like highways, urban renewal, etc. Relatively little was due to blight, and that's concentrated in like 1/4th of the city.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheProf View Post
Not true. Since at least 1890, and probably before, Cleveland's population has always been larger than Pittsburgh's. Today, though having shrunk a lot in the last 4 decades, Cuyahoga County still slightly edges out Allegheny County, 1,243,857 to 1,223,048, per the most recent census estimates.
Are you taking into account that the North Side of Pittsburgh was an independent city (Allegheny) until 1907? By the time it was annexed it had 130,000 people. Pittsburgh + Allegheny continually had more people than Cleveland in the 19th century.

Certainly if you compare all of Allegheny County to all of Cuyahoga County, Pittsburgh was the bigger metro till 1960.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2019, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,353 posts, read 17,022,283 times
Reputation: 12406
I like Cleveland, and I think it has Pittsburgh beat by several metrics, including nightlife in Downtown, presence of useful rail transit, a vibrant and visible black middle class, and a much more organic mix of residential and commercial uses in the oldest neighborhoods like Ohio City and Tremont. And there are far more first-ring suburbs of Cleveland which have charming walkable downtown areas than you find in Allegheny County.

That said, it is not quite Pittsburgh's peer when it comes to urbanity. As others noted, white flight and urban renewal hit Cleveland much harder than Pittsburgh overall, and the downtown area is much more riddled with parking lots. Walkscore is lower, as is overall transit utilization. There is nothing akin to the East End (mostly Squirrel Hill, Shadyside, and Point Breeze) - a large, genuinely wealthy swathe of neighborhoods within city limits. University Circle is nowhere near the secondary urban node that Oakland is. And - just speaking subjectively - I don't think the built vernacular of Great Lakes cities (detached wood-framed homes set back generously from the sidewalk) creates as much of an urban vibe as the closely-packed rowhouse neighborhoods of Pittsburgh.

I do think in terms of urbanity, Baltimore is the closest to Pittsburgh. It's about a half-step higher, and it scores better on Walkscore and transit utilization - it's clearly superior in some ways. I do find it interesting that the wealthy white areas of Baltimore (the "white L" are basically similar in scope/population to Pittsburgh's East End. Functionally speaking, Baltimore is kinda like Pittsburgh with three times as much ghetto.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2019, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,152,053 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by PghYinzer View Post
What is a fishing wall? Is it just that stone lake edge where people can stand and fish?

If so, yes we have a places where you can stand and fish in Pittsburgh.
Wait, that person was trying to argue only Cleveland has places in the city limits you can fish? Have they ever been to Pittsburgh LOL?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2019, 09:29 AM
 
93,257 posts, read 123,898,066 times
Reputation: 18258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empidonax View Post
Metro size is a big factor here, but if we're just looking at individual cities....

Cleveland (pop. ~ 385,000) comes to mind. Buffalo (~ 258,000) also punches above it weight in that regard.

Some other possibilities include Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Madison, St. Louis, and Rochester.

Overall, many of these cities used to have larger populations and stronger economies that help found and support massive cultural amenities. Some of these cities have lost population (and economic support) in the past decades, but have held onto many of their longtime cultural institutions.
Pretty much this, minus Madison and add Cincinnati and Kansas City. This can help offer some idea of peers on a city proper level based off of Pittsburgh's official peak population: https://www.census.gov/population/ww...0027/tab18.txt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2019, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,108 posts, read 23,883,005 times
Reputation: 6438
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Kansas City. I mean even Nashville has come up sever times which is not really even comparable to Pittsburgh IMO.

I guess this proves how off the radar KC is and how so few people know much about the city. Cleveland and St Louis both seem to punch above their size as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2019, 10:30 AM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
Not true for Pittsburgh at least. I did the math years back, and if it gained approximately 110,000 people it would have the same number of households today as it did in 1950.

A fair amount of the household density was "planned loss" as well - things like highways, urban renewal, etc. Relatively little was due to blight, and that's concentrated in like 1/4th of the city.



Are you taking into account that the North Side of Pittsburgh was an independent city (Allegheny) until 1907? By the time it was annexed it had 130,000 people. Pittsburgh + Allegheny continually had more people than Cleveland in the 19th century.

Certainly if you compare all of Allegheny County to all of Cuyahoga County, Pittsburgh was the bigger metro till 1960.
Most cities gained households. Because when you move out of mom and dads you create a new household (maybe with a spouse) so 2 households become 3 with no population growth.

The decline in household size without the cooresponding increase in households represent when they move out of Mom and Dads they leave Pittsburgh or maybe even Greater Pittsburgh. That’s decline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2019, 10:42 AM
 
4,527 posts, read 5,098,565 times
Reputation: 4844
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
Not true for Pittsburgh at least. I did the math years back, and if it gained approximately 110,000 people it would have the same number of households today as it did in 1950.

A fair amount of the household density was "planned loss" as well - things like highways, urban renewal, etc. Relatively little was due to blight, and that's concentrated in like 1/4th of the city.



Are you taking into account that the North Side of Pittsburgh was an independent city (Allegheny) until 1907? By the time it was annexed it had 130,000 people. Pittsburgh + Allegheny continually had more people than Cleveland in the 19th century.

Certainly if you compare all of Allegheny County to all of Cuyahoga County, Pittsburgh was the bigger metro till 1960.
The poster stated he was talking about metro area, which was misleading because he noted the cities, themselves, then mentioning metro areas after the fact... I'm not disagreeing that Allegheny county, itself, may have ranked ahead of Cuyahoga County during some 20th Century censuses. It seems like Pittsburgh is surrounded by a number of really old satellite cities/towns from the 19th Century, whereas Cleveland's burbs are generally much younger... In fact, even by 1920, there was a very small Cuyahoga County population outside Cleveland, and only 3 or 4 established suburbs: East Cleveland, Lakewood, Cleveland Heights, and maybe, a small-scale Euclid (which exploded with industry after WWII.

In 1920 the Van Sweringen brothers were just getting Shaker Heights underway which had at the time IIRC just 1,700 residents (which grew by 10 times in a decade). Cleveland, itself, was massive those days (nearly 900K residents), but few lived outside its borders then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2019, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Marshall-Shadeland, Pittsburgh, PA
32,616 posts, read 77,600,575 times
Reputation: 19101
In my opinion:

-Cleveland Museum of Art > Carnegie Museum of Art
-Cleveland Orchestra > Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra
-Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre > Cleveland Ballet Company
-Cleveland Zoo > Pittsburgh Zoo
-Greater Cleveland Aquarium (Cleveland) > PPG Aquarium (Pittsburgh)
-Playhouse Square (Cleveland) > Pittsburgh's Cultural District
-Oakland (Pittsburgh's secondary CBD) > University Circle (Cleveland's secondary CBD)
-Little Italy (Cleveland) > Bloomfield (Pittsburgh's "Little Italy")
-Pittsburgh City Neighborhoods (More or Less) > Cleveland City Neighborhoods (More or Less)
-Cleveland Suburbs (More or Less) > Pittsburgh Suburbs (More or Less)
-West Side Market > Pittsburgh's Strip District
-Pittsburgh's Market Square > Cleveland's Public Square
-East Carson Street (Pittsburgh's nightlife hub) > East 4th Street (Cleveland's nightlife hub)
-Cleveland MSA's Quality-of-Life for African-Americans > Pittsburgh MSA's Quality-of-Life for African-Americans
-Appeal of Lake Erie + Lakefront Development/Access = Appeal of Pittsburgh's Three Rivers + Riverfront Development/Access
-Pittsburgh Skyline > Cleveland Skyline
-Downtown Cleveland (borders as defined) > Downtown Pittsburgh (borders as defined)
-"Greater" Downtown Pittsburgh (i.e. adding North Shore, Strip District, South Shore) > "Greater" Downtown Cleveland (i.e. adding The Flats/West Bank)
-PPG Paints Arena (Pittsburgh) > Rocket Mortgage Field House (Cleveland)
-PNC Park (Pittsburgh) > Progressive Field (Cleveland)
-FirstEnergy Stadium (Cleveland) > Heinz Field (Pittsburgh)
-Cleveland Light Rail > Pittsburgh Light Rail
-Pittsburgh BRT (East, West, and South Busways) > Cleveland BRT (HealthLine)
-Pittsburgh Surface Buses > Cleveland Surface Buses
-Cleveland Traffic Flow > Pittsburgh Traffic Flow
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top