Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What's the best city?
Pittsburgh 70 38.25%
Charlotte 47 25.68%
Nashville 55 30.05%
Indianapolis 11 6.01%
Voters: 183. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Old 10-03-2016, 09:49 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,057 posts, read 31,278,237 times
Reputation: 47514

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
Only 2 of 81 voters thus far selected Indianapolis. I harbor disdain for Indiana in general for not apologizing for Mike Pence (at least we in PA tarred and feathered Rick Santorum out of office years ago), but otherwise is Indianapolis really that bad? It seems like it has a great highway system; isn't far from Chicago; has a decent economy; and is growing rapidly in population. Why so few votes? The high crime? The urban sprawl? The scenery?
It's not bad, but what does it have to distinguish it from other Midwest metros like St. Louis, Columbus, and Kansas City? None of these places have great scenery, great weather, etc. They all run together. They're all average.

Yes, the economy is good and the cost of living is low. It's one of your better values for your urban dollar in the country, if you look at things purely by the numbers.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2016, 10:27 AM
 
1,556 posts, read 1,910,410 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious Conversation View Post
Is coming into the metro from I-70 either west or eastbound much different than 74? No. 69 going into Marion County is obviously suburban/urban, same with 65 northbound before the split. How are places like Wayne Township faring? Is it growing in terms of absolute numbers of people? Probably. Is Wayne Township vibrant? No.

Most of the growth and vibrancy is in Center and Washington townships.

You can't separate the city and county under Unigov. Outside of the independent cities in Marion County, they are the same by definition.
For starter you don't have cornfields leading to the city from all directions so yes there is a difference. Also you clearly stated that Indy's core is declining which is a flatout lie. In 2010 Indy's population was reported to be 820,445 and in 2015 it was estimated to be 853,173. That is a growth rate of about 4.0% Marion County on the other hand population in 2010 was reported to be 903,393 and in 2015 estimated to be 939,020. That is a growth rate of about 3.9%.

Both the county and city are growing at roughly the same rate. IMO 4.0 growth rate during a 5-year period isn't a decline which is what you CLEARLY stated in your previous post. Also, singling out Wayne County as proof that Indy's population is in decline is a false equivalence. Next you will bring up the extinct communities of Brightwood and Clifford Park as further proof of a steady decline. But then again maybe you wouldn't because that was before your times and only native Hoosiers who grow up during that time period can recall those days.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2016, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,352 posts, read 17,019,980 times
Reputation: 12406
Indianapolis city limits does not equal the core.

Here's a map of Marion County. All of the areas in white are part of the consolidated city county. Only the areas in blue are not.



Center Township is a fairly close analogue to the old, unconsolidated Indianapolis (altough pre-Unigov Indianapolis was a bit bigger). In 1950 it had 337,000 people. In 2010 it had less than 143,000. That's a population decline of roughly 58% in the old urban core. There does seem to be slight population growth again this decade, but the population trajectory of the core of Indianapolis isn't any different from the city of Pittsburgh.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2016, 12:15 PM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,057 posts, read 31,278,237 times
Reputation: 47514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyadic View Post
For starter you don't have cornfields leading to the city from all directions so yes there is a difference. Also you clearly stated that Indy's core is declining which is a flatout lie. In 2010 Indy's population was reported to be 820,445 and in 2015 it was estimated to be 853,173. That is a growth rate of about 4.0% Marion County on the other hand population in 2010 was reported to be 903,393 and in 2015 estimated to be 939,020. That is a growth rate of about 3.9%.

Both the county and city are growing at roughly the same rate. IMO 4.0 growth rate during a 5-year period isn't a decline which is what you CLEARLY stated in your previous post. Also, singling out Wayne County as proof that Indy's population is in decline is a false equivalence. Next you will bring up the extinct communities of Brightwood and Clifford Park as further proof of a steady decline. But then again maybe you wouldn't because that was before your times and only native Hoosiers who grow up during that time period can recall those days.
Sorry if the "core" reference was inaccurate.

Basically what I was getting at is when you're driving toward downtown on 70, especially going westbound, you are seeing a lot of rundown houses, abandoned properties, etc. Same thing when you get past 38th on most of the north-south streets - you go from areas that are decent to bad FAST. Much of the west side feels largely vacant. Is there honestly a lot of action out toward the airpoint other than shipping centers?

I'm sure there are exceptions in certain areas, but it feels like the majority of growth in the city is in Washington and Center townships. Are the others numerically declining in population? I don't know - and frankly, I don't think it really matters. Many of the outlying township areas are heavily suburban in nature and have long since been eclipsed in prestige and influence by nearby suburbs.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2016, 03:10 PM
 
1,556 posts, read 1,910,410 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
Indianapolis city limits does not equal the core.

Here's a map of Marion County. All of the areas in white are part of the consolidated city county. Only the areas in blue are not.



Center Township is a fairly close analogue to the old, unconsolidated Indianapolis (altough pre-Unigov Indianapolis was a bit bigger). In 1950 it had 337,000 people. In 2010 it had less than 143,000. That's a population decline of roughly 58% in the old urban core. There does seem to be slight population growth again this decade, but the population trajectory of the core of Indianapolis isn't any different from the city of Pittsburgh.
Center Township is only part of what was originally old Indianapolis.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 06:44 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,352 posts, read 17,019,980 times
Reputation: 12406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyadic View Post
Center Township is only part of what was originally old Indianapolis.
Population decline is widespread inside inner Indianapolis.





Virtually the entire pre-Unigov area of Indianapolis is in decline.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 06:51 AM
 
1,556 posts, read 1,910,410 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
Population decline is widespread inside inner Indianapolis.





Virtually the entire pre-Unigov area of Indianapolis is in decline.
Aren't you being a little over the top? The decline on the near eastside and westside of town. My question is what does that have to do with the overall growth of the city? I gather you know very little about the city other than google.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 07:29 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,057 posts, read 31,278,237 times
Reputation: 47514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyadic View Post
Aren't you being a little over the top? The decline on the near eastside and westside of town. My question is what does that have to do with the overall growth of the city? I gather you know very little about the city other than google.
The city may be growing but large parts of the pre unigov aren't. That's the "core" of the city. Frankly, I'm really surprised that those far NW side areas are growing.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,680 posts, read 9,387,327 times
Reputation: 7261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious Conversation View Post
The city may be growing but large parts of the pre unigov aren't. That's the "core" of the city. Frankly, I'm really surprised that those far NW side areas are growing.
And the map shows clearly shows that. The city will be alright, it just needs more resources to fight crime, and more investment in removing the blighted areas. Indianapolis appears to have centralized growth, like Cincinnati, and some other Midwestern cities. The continued focus on downtown will be a great thing. It is far from a trendy or popular city, but the efforts have not gone unnoticed. The major issue for Indianapolis other than crime is competition from regional/extra-regional cities.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 08:27 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,057 posts, read 31,278,237 times
Reputation: 47514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
And the map shows clearly shows that. The city will be alright, it just needs more resources to fight crime, and more investment in removing the blighted areas. Indianapolis appears to have centralized growth, like Cincinnati, and some other Midwestern cities. The continued focus on downtown will be a great thing. It is far from a trendy or popular city, but the efforts have not gone unnoticed. The major issue for Indianapolis other than crime is competition from regional/extra-regional cities.
I think a lot of these issues it really has no control over. Lakes, beaches, and mountains aren't going to magically spring up. The climate isn't going to get any better. It should focus on remaining inexpensive and reducing crime.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top