Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2017, 06:22 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, Orange County CA
9,807 posts, read 11,162,626 times
Reputation: 7997

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
Ghost town, Temecula???

When I moved to Murrieta Temecula had about 40,000 people (2000), when I left in 2009 it was well beyond 100,000 and growing. Not to mention the great wineries?

You obviously have not been there since about 1966.
It's not an ugly place to be sure, but it is STILL in the middle of nowhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2017, 06:25 PM
 
10,097 posts, read 10,027,066 times
Reputation: 5225
Quote:
Originally Posted by taimaishu View Post
Why not? Someone has to build up that ghost town. It's been a ghost down for how many years? Guy is creating jobs, boosting the economy and paying taxes.

CA needs more people like him!

Reminds me of the time when idiots wanted Sriracha to leave town. hahahah morons.
I agree with you but it's not a ghost town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2017, 06:37 PM
 
Location: San Diego A.K.A "D.A.Y.G.O City"
1,996 posts, read 4,776,344 times
Reputation: 2743
I appreciate everyone's feedback.

Even CA inland regions are getting more expensive because the vast majority of residents are thinking like the rest of us. MOVE INLAND for affordability. Well, now many parts of Temecula, inland empire, San Berdo are slowly going the way of the coastal cities of CA. New construction is catering to the upper middle class and not ones making $40-70,000 a year. Every time I see new housing development, the homes and condo's are well over $400,000 at the bottom and are around $800,000 for nicer properties. The property taxes alone on something that high is devastating to the owner.

Plus with taxes continue to increase year after year, I wouldn't want to spend my hard earned money on a house in CA anyway after researching what I'll be getting.

My parents and grandparents had it made with housing being affordable when they were young, now the young millennial generation is really being forced out of California because the high cost of living is only going to get worse.

Sure one can go to college and get a degree, but with all the time you would put into school, the amount of student loan debt one will occur over the years, and then still trying to be able to buy a home makes it seem impossible. Remember the sunshine tax of CA allows employers to pay lower wages to people for professional work that are willing and are desperate to move here from out of state, this gives the edge and leverage to the employer when it comes to hiring, so the local guy gets shafted from someone that's coming from Minnesota while taking a $30,000 a year pay cut just to live in SD or anywhere in CA that is desirable. Local beginning young talent suffers.

Only the ones that are lucky and have parents that actually own a house here and is close to being paid off, truly have a chance to make it. But the ones that are renters, forget it. Trying to save money to put away for a home, with all the bills one has to fork out for everyday expenses don't have a chance unless they are making well over $100,000 a year, and even that's not enough money if you're are thinking of raising a family and being financially secure.

No more complaining, I guess the majority of people that are in my situation will just have to move out of state and leave it to the rich to take all the punches and bs that this state has put onto its residents making it harder and more expensive to live here. That is my plan, I don't want to live way up in mountains in the middle of nowhere sacrificing my commute or quality of life, while I can live in a city for half the price in another state. Las Vegas here I come!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2017, 06:58 PM
 
5,381 posts, read 8,699,721 times
Reputation: 4550
Quote:
Originally Posted by radiolibre99 View Post
OC to Burbank? Hellllll no. That's too much a sacrifice. In NYC I assumed the train system made commutes more tolerable and their being massive assistance according to a NYC poster in the LA forum.
A lot of NYC's cops, nurses and teachers live in subsidized housing:

2017 Fact Sheet - NYC.gov
"NYCHA is home to 1 in 14 New Yorkers. Our residents are employed as teachers, police officers, nurses – people who provide services that are essential to the City. NYCHA “alumni” include Howard Schultz, the founder of Starbucks, Goldman Sachs Chair and CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Whoopi Goldberg, NASA aerospace engineer Aprille Ericsson, journalist Errol Louis, and Dr. Mary Bassett, New York City Health Commissioner."

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2017, 07:05 PM
 
5,381 posts, read 8,699,721 times
Reputation: 4550
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdlife619 View Post

No more complaining, I guess the majority of people that are in my situation will just have to move out of state and leave it to the rich to take all the punches and bs that this state has put onto its residents making it harder and more expensive to live here. That is my plan, I don't want to live way up in mountains in the middle of nowhere sacrificing my commute or quality of life, while I can live in a city for half the price in another state. Las Vegas here I come!
It's never fun, but you are doing what people around the globe have always done and will continue to do, pack-up and move to a more hospitable area when resources are thin.

Think of it this way, the able and strong adapt (Move to better resources) to survive.

Best of luck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2017, 07:10 PM
 
600 posts, read 568,261 times
Reputation: 796
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
Ghost town, Temecula???

When I moved to Murrieta Temecula had about 40,000 people (2000), when I left in 2009 it was well beyond 100,000 and growing. Not to mention the great wineries?

You obviously have not been there since about 1966.
lol. i wasn't even born yet. it's a ghost town. The only time you see people is when you head over to Pechanga.

it's good that investors are building attractions to the area. Good for the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2017, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,499,110 times
Reputation: 12319
Quote:
Originally Posted by taimaishu View Post
lol. i wasn't even born yet. it's a ghost town. The only time you see people is when you head over to Pechanga.

it's good that investors are building attractions to the area. Good for the city.
Old town Temecula and the wineries are pretty busy on the weekends

Old Town Temecula Restaurants & Dining
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2017, 08:46 PM
 
4,369 posts, read 3,731,343 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cakeordeath View Post
Isn't that what Mexicans are for?
Not only is that racist but illegal Immigrants can't event qualify for the good outdoors jobs like USPS, park ranger, fire fighter, or police officer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2017, 08:47 PM
 
386 posts, read 327,828 times
Reputation: 1037
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacific2 View Post
It's never fun, but you are doing what people around the globe have always done and will continue to do, pack-up and move to a more hospitable area when resources are thin.

Think of it this way, the able and strong adapt (Move to better resources) to survive.

Best of luck.
History calls this carpetbagging
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2017, 11:20 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,499,110 times
Reputation: 12319
Gentrification is nothing new but the opposite is worse .

Gentrification ends up lowering crime especially violent crime .

Most people want the benefits of gentrification ( lower crime , cleaner environments , more amenities ) but they don't want to pay the higher housing costs of living in a gentrified neighborhood.

"If we understand gentrification to be similar to the definition I’ve offered above, we can realize that gentrification is thousands of years old. Rebuilding and renewing? This was going on in ancient Rome when large villas began to replace small shops in the 3rd century. Evidence of gentrification might arguably date back to the earliest cities and it’s certainly something that’s grown more complex over time."

On Gentrification | The Urbanologist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top