Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That is certainly a possibility, but of course I don't believe that is correct. I think it was such a traumatic event that all the survivors passed down some form of account of the Great Flood.
As long as you acknowledge your opinion is not one of science, but one of choice despite the facts.
That would take some research on my part. My ignorance of King Ashurbanipal has no relation to his historical standing. Nor does his historical standing validate a great flood despite science roundly trouncing that possibility.
This brings up the topic of the bible and the events and peoples of it. There can be historical figures and places depicted in the bible, but that does not validate the magical aspects of the text. It's like Spider-Man comic books; They mention the World Trade Centers/9-11, a real event, but that does not mean Spider-Man is real.
That would take some research on my part. My ignorance of King Ashurbanipal has no relation to his historical standing. Nor does his historical standing validate a great flood despite science roundly trouncing that possibility.
This brings up the topic of the bible and the events and peoples of it. There can be historical figures and places depicted in the bible, but that does not validate the magical aspects of the text. It's like Spider-Man comic books; They mention the World Trade Centers/9-11, a real event, but that does not mean Spider-Man is real.
Well, it sounds like you are coming to conclusions without researching all the facts. Hardly scientific wouldn't you say?
Well, it sounds like you are coming to conclusions without researching all the facts. Hardly scientific wouldn't you say?
LOL!
Hardly. I am telling you I don't know enough about King Ashurbanipal to draw any conclusions about him as a historical figure. If only Creationists would be as honest about unknown things rather than attribute faith as fact.
Whether the good King was real or not, and he very well could be, it doesn't mean a global flood occurred. Science has disqualified that as a reality. Certainly you can grasp this concept, no?
Hardly. I am telling you I don't know enough about King Ashurbanipal to draw any conclusions about him as a historical figure. If only Creationists would be as honest about unknown things rather than attribute faith as fact.
Whether the good King was real or not, and he very well could be, it doesn't mean a global flood occurred. Science has disqualified that as a reality. Certainly you can grasp this concept, no?
I just gave you some facts for your consideration, but since it doesn't fit in your world view, you just dismiss them, hardly good research.
Hardly. I am telling you I don't know enough about King Ashurbanipal to draw any conclusions about him as a historical figure. If only Creationists would be as honest about unknown things rather than attribute faith as fact.
Whether the good King was real or not, and he very well could be, it doesn't mean a global flood occurred. Science has disqualified that as a reality. Certainly you can grasp this concept, no?
Science disqualified a round earth as well, and they were wrong...
You speak of Science as gospel, the religion of science...
godspeed,
freedom
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
