[OpinionInOcala]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

So, what I'm getting from that is that you do feel that a "certain subset of women will use abortion services as a whimsical, postcoital cure-all in wanton fashion" do need to have their reproductive life monitored or restricted. I have one last question for you, are you suggesting women be screened and limited in what choices they can make about a pregnancy if they are 'whimsical about their pregnancy', or are you going to have all women treated like 11 year old children so that we can be sure the "subset" doesn't make a mistake?

You're not getting anything from me; you're filtering my comments through emotional and ideological lenses and regurgitating the product of a false synthesis. We're not even having a real dialogue, as you've continuously redefined and misrepresented what I've said. I've charitably given you ample opportunity to engage in productive discussion and you've refused to do so. At this point I'm unsure whether you're unwilling or incapable, though I suspect the former is likely.

I'll be generous in answering your "final" question(s): No, and, No. But you wouldn't have asked that (those) questions if you were being serious (or honest) in the first place.

[RowingFiend]

Originally Posted by djsuperfly

There is virtually no one, anywhere advocating for elective abortions in the 3rd trimester.

That’s just a lie. Democrats in deep blue states have proudly enacted laws guaranteeing exactly that.

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by RowingFiend

That’s just a lie. Democrats in deep blue states have proudly enacted laws guaranteeing exactly that.

What laws are you are you referring to?