Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-29-2013, 07:38 AM
 
Location: Full time in the RV
3,421 posts, read 7,818,100 times
Reputation: 3333

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hopefulone View Post
Just so long as supervisors are held to the same standard about how long their job should be kept open.

Also I said I would quit if they wouldn't let me take off to attend a parents funeral. I absolutely would tell that employer to stick it in that case.
I agree.

This is why written policies become important. I know they are not always followed but at least it is a starting point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2013, 10:16 AM
 
Location: All Over
4,003 posts, read 6,133,426 times
Reputation: 3165
Quote:
Originally Posted by hopefulone View Post
Yes I agree with your point too. But the sad thing is that sometimes a supervisor's parent is ill, they have no qualms about taking time off. There seems to be a different set of rules for them. Its wrong for those under the supervisor to tend to their ill parent, but yet the supervisor can come and go as they please. This business about not letting people off to attend a parent's funeral or someone in their immediate family is ludicrous. And that is why I would not hesitate to leave such a company in a case like that.
yeah i get your point and its not fair but honestly higher up employees are treated differntly in all aspects. try getting a company to fly you out for an interview or even better pay moving expenses for you for an entry level job...they wont. for a higher level employee they will. its about how much they value you and how much value you bring to the company
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2013, 11:23 AM
 
3,730 posts, read 4,649,833 times
Reputation: 3430
Quote:
Originally Posted by doodlemagic View Post
yeah i get your point and its not fair but honestly higher up employees are treated differntly in all aspects. try getting a company to fly you out for an interview or even better pay moving expenses for you for an entry level job...they wont. for a higher level employee they will. its about how much they value you and how much value you bring to the company

Oh I already know there are a different set of rules and sometimes rules are made up as they go along. But in the end it can and will bite them in the rear. That was the whole point of my post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2013, 12:11 PM
 
10,599 posts, read 17,973,481 times
Reputation: 17353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockyman View Post
I work in a big company with around 275-300 employees. Everyone is entitled to a month leave of absence during the first three months of the year.

One part-time employee had a mother dying of cancer. There was no definite date set as to when she would die, so it could have taken months, maybe even longer.

Well this employee took a whole month off to care for her mother, and when she asked to extend her unpaid leave, my company basically did not give her the option of doing that. Their philosophy is basically an employee can only have unpaid undetermined leave of absence for dying spouses or children. Other close family is not allowed, even if you live with them.

Do you think this is wrong? Or would granting this employee an undetermined leave open the doors for other employees leaving to take care of close dying relatives?
You're wrong and uninformed. It's not a PHILOSOPHY it's a LAW. And one that you've misstated.

FMLA lays out the requirements for this unpaid leave. ie. How long she worked there and how many hours she's accrued and how long she's allowed to take.

The one month unpaid leave for everyone company policy is very generous. I assume it's because of some seasonal work fluctuations that can be mutually beneficial to both employees and company.

My guess is she did NOT qualify for FMLA beyond the OPTIONAL company policy. Even IF she did, she possibly hurt herself by taking off the month and cutting into the worked hours that she accrued that "year".

They CANNOT change their policies hap haphazardly because then they'd have to treat every single person the same and spend thousands of person hours checking for fraud etc while STILL meeting FMLA law requirements.

Managing FMLA for a company is a HUGE thing. Half the time the company OUTSOURCES it to an HR management company to be sure the law is complied with and everything tracked and documented correctly.

Obviously nobody here complaining OWNS a company! Or is even a manager with responsibility for such things.

Last edited by runswithscissors; 11-04-2013 at 12:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2014, 06:52 PM
 
107 posts, read 204,901 times
Reputation: 57
This might have been posted earlier; I apologize for not having the time to read every entry on this thread, but I was wondering how an HR department could release my co-worker (after working there for 18 years), post her position and then fill it with someone else from the same department - while she was taking FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE for only 4 weeks. I'm assuming this is against the law; the very reason it was put in place was to not let this happen. Couldn't the company be fined? Would she have to retain an attorney? This is not a small company, but I didn't think size mattered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2014, 03:46 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,748,341 times
Reputation: 8808
Size does matter.
Quote:
Your company must also be eligible to let you use the privilege, which means it must have at least 50 employees who work within 75 miles of its location. Once again, various states have different provisions, so consult with HR.
So it doesn't matter whether the company is large, but rather whether the office that the employee works in is large.

Something else is important:
Quote:
Eligible employees must have worked for their employer for at least 12 months prior to requesting the leave. And they must also have worked at least 1,250 hours in those 12 months. For someone who works an eight-hour day, that translates to approximately 156 days.
So what matters is not how many years the employee worked for the employer, but how many hours they've worked over the previous twelve months.

And one other thing is very important:
Quote:
A job is guaranteed to you, but not necessarily the same job you had before.
Until your co-worker tries to return to work and is told that there is no job for her, there's nothing to say. There is no provision against hiring someone to do the work of an employee on FML.

Perhaps the most important question, though, is whether you co-worker applied for FMLA consideration. Just saying that you're going to take time off to care for a loved one or whatever isn't necessarily enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2014, 07:05 AM
 
3,730 posts, read 4,649,833 times
Reputation: 3430
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwiley View Post

The funny thing is the ones who ended up being the most heartless about things were the same ones who would complain about how heartless companies had become when it was their own personal situation.

Agreed. When the shoe is on the other foot their tune changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2014, 08:06 AM
 
12,124 posts, read 23,421,514 times
Reputation: 27309
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOV49 View Post
This might have been posted earlier; I apologize for not having the time to read every entry on this thread, but I was wondering how an HR department could release my co-worker (after working there for 18 years), post her position and then fill it with someone else from the same department - while she was taking FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE for only 4 weeks. I'm assuming this is against the law; the very reason it was put in place was to not let this happen. Couldn't the company be fined? Would she have to retain an attorney? This is not a small company, but I didn't think size mattered.

She does not have a legal right to the same position if it is no longer vacant (and there is no law preventing the vacancy from being filled). She does have the right to a position that is substantially equal in pay, benefits, and responsibility. She won't know if she has a case until she returns to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2014, 09:43 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,901,457 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwiley View Post
FMLA covers parents, meaning if she worked more then 24 hours per week she was entitled to at least 12 weeks.
http://www.dol.gov/whd/fmla/fmla-faqs.htm





Also you choosing to be unemployed for 3 years is not her problem, she had a job, and is covered under federal labor laws, which means she should still have a job.
One problem with FMLA -- once there are laws regarding leave, many businesses will stick to the law.

My uncle had an extended illness before FMLA and they let him come back to work as soon as he was able -- but that was way more than 12 weeks, he was in a hospital for longer than that and then had a few months recovery. They just kept him as an employee. He was a good worker, reliable employee and they rewarded him for that.

Once the laws were put into place, it becomes tougher to make exceptions -- what you do for one, you have to do for all -- even the most pathetic employees. If one wants 12 weeks to stay home with a dying relative, another wants 6 months to be a stay at home mother and another decides fibromyalgia should mean you work only if you feel like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2014, 09:48 PM
 
Location: canada
268 posts, read 653,128 times
Reputation: 119
Don't be an *******, let the employee work from home okay? Or let her work at work and take personal phone calls.. The bottom line is as long as it is not affecting her work quality..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top