Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2019, 10:42 PM
 
Location: Denver
4,716 posts, read 8,576,941 times
Reputation: 5957

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EDS_ View Post
I tend to agree with you.

But it still seems odd that I was able to get in with roughly a 3.5 gpa and very good test scores. While my son with a essentially perfect bonafides didn't get so much as an on campus interview. It really doesn't matter as he would have passed anyway but I find it curious.

________________________

I know nothing much about Amherst but so far as your boy and Brown.......Brown has a rep. for confounding admissions decisions.
When you have 50,000+ applications, a good portion of whom are academically prepared, and only 2000 spots, it starts getting really arbitrary. Handpicked crowds of 18-year-olds who can basically choose between either being on the forefront of their field or working like a dog in investment banking and retiring wealthy at 40. Like “which Native American girl who started a non-profit for veterans and has a 1400+ SAT” and “whose alumni father has the better legacy/endowment (and has a 1400+ SAT)” kind of arbitrary.

For the real world, as long as the school doesn’t accept everyone and/or has NCAA Division I athletics, it’s “elite” material. It’s really just about whether the resume reader has heard of your school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2019, 12:26 AM
 
19,792 posts, read 18,085,519 times
Reputation: 17279
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnfairPark View Post
Well, it’s a relief that we are done and over with. It’s still nice to see Texas climbing up the elite education ladder.
It's is. My daughter has on more big hurdle in a few years with match day that's about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2019, 08:19 AM
 
19,792 posts, read 18,085,519 times
Reputation: 17279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerner92 View Post
When you have 50,000+ applications, a good portion of whom are academically prepared, and only 2000 spots, it starts getting really arbitrary. Handpicked crowds of 18-year-olds who can basically choose between either being on the forefront of their field or working like a dog in investment banking and retiring wealthy at 40. Like “which Native American girl who started a non-profit for veterans and has a 1400+ SAT” and “whose alumni father has the better legacy/endowment (and has a 1400+ SAT)” kind of arbitrary.

For the real world, as long as the school doesn’t accept everyone and/or has NCAA Division I athletics, it’s “elite” material. It’s really just about whether the resume reader has heard of your school.
IMO that's a little cynical. Although there is for sure a "randomness" to the whole thing that's tough to figure out.

It's cool now. Rice simply made an error. Or at least we look at that way. He's gone on to do things academically that very few Rice grads would have a shot at from a capability and desire perspective. So it's all good. But man he was upset then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2019, 06:31 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
4,422 posts, read 6,259,038 times
Reputation: 5429
Quote:
Originally Posted by asknow123 View Post
Rice is a good school... but UT is clearly the better school in most disciplines.


Now let the debate begin...
No debate. Rice is the most nationally elite university. UT does have a better football team though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2019, 08:02 PM
 
19,792 posts, read 18,085,519 times
Reputation: 17279
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewtexan View Post
No debate. Rice is the most nationally elite university. UT does have a better football team though.
But why? A&M has more top 10 programs than Rice. UT has more top 10 programs than A&M.

No doubt, university wide, Rice undergrad is harder to get into than either A&M or UT but at the end of the day why is that so important?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2019, 01:30 PM
 
3,678 posts, read 4,175,469 times
Reputation: 3332
UT has Professor Matthew “Sexiest Man Alive” McConaughey and his Oscar. All right, all right, all right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2019, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
197 posts, read 229,338 times
Reputation: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerner92 View Post
For the real world, as long as the school doesn’t accept everyone and/or has NCAA Division I athletics, it’s “elite” material. It’s really just about whether the resume reader has heard of your school.
The Ivy League is Division I, and so is Stanford (FYI, Rice is Division I as well). So there are elite, highly-selective schools with Division I athletics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2019, 06:46 PM
 
1,534 posts, read 2,772,002 times
Reputation: 3603
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmlx View Post
The Ivy League is Division I, and so is Stanford (FYI, Rice is Division I as well). So there are elite, highly-selective schools with Division I athletics.
yeah, but none of the Ivies offer athletic scholarships...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2019, 09:55 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
197 posts, read 229,338 times
Reputation: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by homeinatx View Post
yeah, but none of the Ivies offer athletic scholarships...
It seems that they still weigh (or have weighed in the past) athletic ability quite heavily in their admissions practices, though:

https://www.theatlantic.com/educatio...udents/573688/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2019, 08:54 AM
 
3,678 posts, read 4,175,469 times
Reputation: 3332
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmlx View Post
It seems that they still weigh (or have weighed in the past) athletic ability quite heavily in their admissions practices, though:

https://www.theatlantic.com/educatio...udents/573688/
Athletic ability gets more weight than academic ability, and all colleges make graduation easier for athletes and give them generous financial aid to make up for athletic scholarships. It’s unjust but understandable, good athletes excite alumni donor base, academic super stars can perform no such magic.

To be fair it’s not easy to lure star athletes from big flagships as they often offer full ride athletic scholarships, huge fan base, strong teams, celebrity status, resources, more exposure and a whole lot extras.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top