Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I choose to believe the Biblical account. [\quote]
Which clearly explains why your "facts" are ridiculed. They are only your belief, not fact. Yet you seem to not realize this. Pitiful.
What is pitiful, is your lack of understanding that the Biblical account is based on numerous facts that you have either ignored, or have no knowledge of. The link below speaks of archaelolgical discoveries that confirm many Biblical accounts. If you want to dismiss these facts. Well then, perhaps your the one who has little intrest in facts.
What is pitiful, is your lack of understanding that the Biblical account is based on numerous facts that you have either ignored, or have no knowledge of. The link below speaks of archaelolgical discoveries that confirm many Biblical accounts. If you want to dismiss these facts. Well then, perhaps your the one who has little intrest in facts.
Who is disputing historical evidence of ancient Israel.There is a HUGE difference between being correct that there was a King David and an Israeli kingdom,and being correct that there was a worldwide flood.Nations around the world have had civilizations existing there continuously since before the Flood.How do you explain that?
So Campbell, you ignore what the folks at the Associates For Biblical Research have to say, About - Associates for Biblical Research in favour of what you believe. I thought that by linking to such a site it might have some credibility with you, but you are claiming that you know more about the subject than this group?
Repeat after me...."I might be wrong" ...Again ....."I might be wrong".....Was that so hard?
Who is disputing historical evidence of ancient Israel.There is a HUGE difference between being correct that there was a King David and an Israeli kingdom,and being correct that there was a worldwide flood.Nations around the world have had civilizations existing there continuously since before the Flood.How do you explain that?
Tell me what nations have existed before the flood, and maybe I can give you an answer. According to the Biblical chronological record, the flood occured around the year 4989 B.C.
What is truly pitiful is that you think your opinion or beliefs make any difference to anyone. All they do is show your bias and lack of knowledge.
BTW, before you accuse others of dismissing facts, perhaps you should hold up a mirror toward your reactions to any and all links supplied to you in your fantasy state disputing all that you hold dear (in spite of a lack of credible evidence).
BTW, you "evidence from archaeology" appear to be supplied from sources with an agenda to support idiotic beliefs such as yours. Biased reporting is always suspect just as you are always wrong.
Most of the links I am asked to read also come from sources with an agenda. Yet between either there is some common ground. So one can not dismiss everything. And everyone has a bias, and if your going to accuse me of having a lack of knowledge, please be a little more detailed. I hate bland general statements that lack details.
Tell me what nations have existed before the flood, and maybe I can give you an answer. According to the Biblical chronological record, the flood occured around the year 4989 B.C.
I am speaking of prehistorical peoples.In S Am,the Mesoamerican.In Austrilia,the aborigines.In N Am,the Native Americans(Indians).How can these people have had civilizations from before the Flood until after the Flood continuously?
And why aren't there kangaroos anywhere but Australia?If they came off Noah's Ark in the ME,why did they all pack up and go to Oz?And how did the get there?You have just said that the current continents came about because of a collapse due to the Flood.This means that Australia would have been cut off from the other continents at the time they hopped off Noah's Ark.
I hate to throw another fly in your soup Campbell, but what say you to this?
The 5165-m-high, double-peaked stratovolcano Mount Ararat, also known as Agri Dagi, is Turkey's highest, largest volume, and easternmost volcano.
The initial stage of flank eruptions produced a cluster of cinder cones and dacitic-rhyolitic lava domes surrounding Greater Ararat and a series of pyroclastic cones and domes on the western flank of Lesser Ararat. Late-stage activity formed large pyroclastic cones lower on the flanks of the two volcanoes. Ararat appears to have been active during the 3rd millennium BC; pyroclastic-flow deposits overlie early Bronze Age artifacts and human remains. Karakhanian et al. (2002) reported historical evidence for a phreatic eruption and pyroclastic flow at the time of a July 1840 earthquake and landslide.
There is always going to be different opinions on the time of the flood. Yet we are only speaking about a difference of 2500 years. Just as some believe the earth is only 6,000 years old, while others like myself believe it is closer to 13,000 years. And often, there are good reasons for either belief.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
fficial&channel=s&tbs=tl:1&tbo=u&ei=27LdS53FH5 D0nQOTtL3fBw&oi=timeline_result&ct=title&resnum=11 &ved=0CC0Q5wIwCg