Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-16-2010, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Back in the gym...Yo Adrian!
10,181 posts, read 20,818,198 times
Reputation: 19901

Advertisements

Because they don't want to be some guys side piece forever. It's one thing if you have a mutually casual relationship. But if one person has different goals or is starting to have feelings for the other, they no longer want to invest more of themselves into something that isn't going anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-16-2010, 02:31 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,787,011 times
Reputation: 14747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redisca View Post
Oh, did I hit a nerve.
By demanding proof, when all you offer is vague "personal experience"? By pursuing a new strawman in each of your posts?

yes, that hits a nerve.


Quote:
To claim that something is a consequence of biology -- that's a scientific statement of fact. Science imposes very particular requirements with respect to substantiation of scientific claims. You can't just pick some sexist practice and claim that it exists because it's "biological", for lack of a better justification.
I claimed a belief that it is a consequence of biology.

this is completely different than stating that it is a scientific fact. please show me where i stated that this is a scientific fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2010, 02:33 PM
 
3,486 posts, read 5,693,615 times
Reputation: 3869
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
By demanding proof, when all you offer is vague "personal experience"?
I am not the one making scientific statements based on personal experience.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
I claimed a belief that it is a consequence of biology.
Okay -- what is that belief based on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2010, 02:35 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,787,011 times
Reputation: 14747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redisca View Post
I am not the one making scientific statements based on personal experience.
nor am I.

what is this, strawman #7? #8? I lose track.

Quote:
Okay -- what is that belief based on?
personal experience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2010, 02:38 PM
 
3,486 posts, read 5,693,615 times
Reputation: 3869
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
what is this, strawman #7? #8? I lose track.
No, this is a reasonable assessment of your statements.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
personal experience.
How is personal experience a valid basis for a scientific belief. My personal experience, for example, doesn't demonstrate that matter is made up of atoms. Is that a valid basis for me to believe that it's not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2010, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,258 posts, read 64,492,659 times
Reputation: 73943
The Single Stigma

You Going to Be an Old Maid? Single Women, Stigma, and Gender Inequality (http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/0/4/9/9/p104992_index.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2010, 05:28 PM
 
2 posts, read 1,942 times
Reputation: 10
Alot of presumptuous responses from the ladies. And I notice women are diff to men. A man can't work out in a few months if he will marry the girl. Not all men are like that. Infact the good ones take their time coz they have a lot to offer and lose. No wonder why gud girls end up with dead beat guys. They rushed it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2010, 08:03 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX, USA
5,142 posts, read 13,145,305 times
Reputation: 2515
Quote:
Originally Posted by caddio View Post
Alot of presumptuous responses from the ladies. And I notice women are diff to men. A man can't work out in a few months if he will marry the girl. Not all men are like that. Infact the good ones take their time coz they have a lot to offer and lose. No wonder why gud girls end up with dead beat guys. They rushed it.
I dated my husband for about 6 months, engaged for 2 months and got married. Worked out pretty well. We were up front on what we both wanted: marriage. If we didn't want the same thing, we would have not wasted each others time and found someone more compatible instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 11:37 AM
 
16,956 posts, read 16,794,640 times
Reputation: 10408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrister85 View Post
After reading many different threads on this board, thinking of my friends' love lives, and reflecting on my own experiences, I realize how many women like to define what a relationship is very early on.

Why?

Why can't you just run with something and see where it goes? To me it seems very insecure to have to need to label someone as a boyfriend or girlfriend, or to want to have a roadmap for this relationship at its early stages.

For example, I was involved with my female friend and when she stopped seeing me to date some other guy who had better long-term prospect (in her eyes at least), people rushed to say it was because I failed to make it clear for her what we "were" to each other. Some other guy on this forum had the girl do the "us" conversation after one month of dating, and his play-it-safe answer led to their eventual breakup. I mean, come on!

Look, I understand if a woman is in her 30s and looking to get married- she might not want to waste time with dead-end guys. However, I'm in my early 20s and I think romance is best when it runs off on its own and is not negotiated and defined like a contract.


Hopefully, I won't get flak for generalizing too much- I KNOW everyone is not like this.
OP , that is one of the most mature posts I have seen coming from a 20 something year old !

Why do women rush to * get the relationship status * ?

If you know what I am referring to : Facebook is a great example . They hurry to put in a relationship and then a month later : single/broken up .

And most women are the rushers of that. I hardly know a man who says OMG I have to change my FB Status ! And if he DOES it might be because SHE has asked him to change it , why isn't it change ? Are you cheating ? Hiding ? This all equals DRAMA .

The difference being : Are you the type of FB poster who shows stopped up toilet bowl pictures , pictures of half eaten sandwhiches I mean seriously its PATHETIC !

I have been in a R - LDR but I keep my page as single. I don't date anyone else but my LDR - and if anyone asks me- I might tell them but why should I put private matters on my page ? HE knows and I KNOW and thats enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top