Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How physically attracted are you to your partner?
I am (or need to be) very physically attracted to my partner. 54 67.50%
I am (or need to be) moderately physically attracted to my partner. 14 17.50%
I am (or need to be) slightly physically attracted to my partner. 5 6.25%
I am not (or don't need to be) physically attracted to my partner. 3 3.75%
Other- please explain 4 5.00%
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-15-2011, 08:37 PM
 
Location: SoCal - Sherman Oaks & Woodland Hills
12,974 posts, read 33,991,570 times
Reputation: 10491

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sierraAZ View Post
Are you even listening to yourself...? That's fat by everybody's standards and your dating her doesn't make her any less fat; therefore, your numbers are quite a bit off.

And quit with those celebrity comparisons - about yourself and yours! If you want to brag, show us the real deal and we'll figure out if it has anything to do with those celebrities.
My error. She was 5' 4". But do a Google search of Boris Vallejo paintings and THAT is what she was built like. Super flat abs, perfect curves and very femininely muscular.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-15-2011, 08:47 PM
 
37,669 posts, read 46,114,125 times
Reputation: 57262
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaoTzuMindFu View Post
My error. She was 5' 4". But do a Google search of Boris Vallejo paintings and THAT is what she was built like. Super flat abs, perfect curves and very femininely muscular.
I suspect you are off of the weight. A 5'4" frame won't carry that much weight without a huge amount of mass. So, unless she looked like this:

Beth Roberts V486 Photos 5

she weighed much less than 160 - 175.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2011, 08:59 PM
 
4,868 posts, read 8,417,802 times
Reputation: 3161
the woman in the paintings look like a muscular man with boobs...gross. I have no idea why any man with a real penis would be attracted to a "man with boobs and a vag".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2011, 09:01 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,286 posts, read 87,521,965 times
Reputation: 55564
she put on 20 lbs and has many health problems not present 2 years ago. .
not very.
but the affections do not die so easily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2011, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Bellingham, WA
9,726 posts, read 16,762,305 times
Reputation: 14888
I am extremely physically attracted to my SO. Granted, she's imaginary, but still.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2011, 09:19 PM
 
4,868 posts, read 8,417,802 times
Reputation: 3161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
she put on 20 lbs and has many health problems not present 2 years ago. .
not very.
but the affections do not die so easily.
20 lbs is all it took for the attraction to go away??? or is it everything else with it?

I'm just trying to understand because I know when I get older I'm bound to gain 20 lbs due to aging..but in my family, its impossible for us ladies to gain more than 20-30 lbs even if we tried, at any age. But I would be devastated if that was all it took for a husband to leave me...c'mon now!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2011, 09:27 PM
 
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read 52,923,985 times
Reputation: 25363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplight View Post
I am extremely physically attracted to my SO. Granted, she's imaginary, but still.
Hahaha...at least they don't talk back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2011, 09:30 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,286 posts, read 87,521,965 times
Reputation: 55564
Quote:
Originally Posted by mir86 View Post
20 lbs is all it took for the attraction to go away??? or is it everything else with it?

I'm just trying to understand because I know when I get older I'm bound to gain 20 lbs due to aging..but in my family, its impossible for us ladies to gain more than 20-30 lbs even if we tried, at any age. But I would be devastated if that was all it took for a husband to leave me...c'mon now!
if its the guy and he puts on 30 lbs his sex life stops dead, but if the gal puts it on-- he needs counseling and medication.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2011, 09:56 PM
 
4,868 posts, read 8,417,802 times
Reputation: 3161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
if its the guy and he puts on 30 lbs his sex life stops dead, but if the gal puts it on-- he needs counseling and medication.
ha! nope. on men, 30 lbs doesn't look like as much since men tend to be bigger boned and taller anyways. 20 lbs on a man, probably hardly noticeable...I wouldn't leave someone I married over that! Especially if things are still going well.

I used to weigh 15-20lbs more than I weigh now and honestly, everyone that knew me then doesn't even remember that I was "bigger". They say "well ya, you were thicker but you carried it well so we didn't notice". Its just that you're saying 20 lbs makes a difference for you and if me being "thicker" makes a man leave me..that's screwed up. I'm only 5'4" and have small bones so to me, even 5lbs is a big deal on my frame, but since previously, nobody saw it as fat, I don't know why any future man I'm with would either. I don't even plan to gain that much weight besides during pregnancy, but I've learned in life that you really can't plan for anything anymore and you really don't ever know what the future holds, no matter how much you think you do. I think anyone at least 25 years old understands that much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2011, 10:10 PM
 
3,083 posts, read 4,882,342 times
Reputation: 3724
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChessieMom View Post
I suspect you are off of the weight. A 5'4" frame won't carry that much weight without a huge amount of mass. So, unless she looked like this:

Beth Roberts V486 Photos 5

she weighed much less than 160 - 175.
eww..gonna have nightmares over that pic..that is too much muscle mass on a woman for me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top