Does a Husband own his Wife? (mistress, couples, definition, meaning)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
^ I don't understand what you mean. How is it disgusting?
People don't "own" each other. OK, so maybe disgusting was too strong a word. But that certainly sounds controlling. Not an attitude I could be interested in. I don't want to be "owned" nor do I want to "own."
Odd. Most people believe in taking care of those things they own, so by "owning" someone, and feeling responsibility for the person, you show that you care about that person.
But I guess feeling responsible for someone else is passe.
"Does a husband own his wife." Well I say about as much as his wife owns him. And if they r happy with it I am too. I don't think taking a man's name is an indication of ownership. I see it more as a gift to symbolize the union and partnership between a husband and a wife. I mean it is mutual, a joint venture.
not at all. just her credit card debts and the college loans and car payments on her kids.
if he owned her she would feel a sense of obligation, and trust me she does not, none whatsoever.
thanks gloria stienem, you changed it from quid pro quo to caveat emptor.
I would guess that the OP would prefer to take separate cars on a trip together. So she can go her way, and he his way, without learning to go the same way.
not at all. just her credit card debts and the college loans and car payments on her kids.
if he owned her she would feel a sense of obligation, and trust me she does not, none whatsoever.
thanks gloria stienem, you changed it from quid pro quo to caveat emptor.
If ownership means all of the above, it maybe worth rethinking I can be had... but he's got to pay
here is a great example of a husband "owning a wife"
my optician got taken to the cleaners in 2008.
not a bad take, 2 condos for less than 2 years marriage.
no kids fortunately.
his sin?
he refused to pay his sister in laws mortgage and be servant to his
mother in law
not at all. just her credit card debts and the college loans and car payments on her kids.
if he owned her she would feel a sense of obligation, and trust me she does not, none whatsoever.
thanks gloria stienem, you changed it from quid pro quo to caveat emptor.
Where does all this come from? Is it personal experience? Have you been cleaned out by a woman? If so, maybe you chose the wrong woman. I don't need your or any man's money.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't think taking a man's name is an indication of ownership. I see it more as a gift to symbolize the union and partnership between a husband and a wife. I mean it is mutual, a joint venture.
I can be had...
but he's got to pay
