Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-17-2009, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,868,873 times
Reputation: 20675

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wokeuplaughing View Post
What I find unethical about this is that they ACCEPTED our offer of $99.5K three weeks ago, with the thought that they would later push us up higher later on. I would have preferred that they had just countered us immediately after our offer of $99.5K or just had it listed at $110K in the first place.
That acceptance was no doubt contingent upon a third party ( the insurer's) approval.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2009, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Tempe, Arizona
4,511 posts, read 13,605,176 times
Reputation: 2201
Quote:
Originally Posted by wokeuplaughing View Post
While you doubt that it happened, I don't! He actually TOLD our Realtor that he thought we would come up higher from the beginning. Now, I JUST (just minutes ago) found out that they DID have a PMI rejection before us, so they KNEW what was and wasn't going to fly with them!
I'm not doubting anything you said. Just reacting to the comments as I read them.

And my congratulations on getting the house. Buying with equity built in is an achievement in today's market, not to mention actually closing on a short sale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Tempe, Arizona
4,511 posts, read 13,605,176 times
Reputation: 2201
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
That acceptance was no doubt contingent upon a third party ( the insurer's) approval.
Good point. If the acceptance the OP mentioned for $99.5K was from the owner/seller of the house, then the bank must also approve as a contingency, and could very well ask for a higher price to give their approval. This happens all the time with short sales.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
9 posts, read 21,492 times
Reputation: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
That acceptance was no doubt contingent upon a third party ( the insurer's) approval.
I know that is the case. I wish somebody had pointed that out to us. Then it would not have been such a surprise.

I'd like to thank everybody again on their input. Being a first time home buyer comes with a lot of "huh?" moments and I'll look back on this as a learning experience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Boise, ID
8,046 posts, read 28,531,255 times
Reputation: 9470
This post was a learning experience for me. I had no idea that the PMI company could reject the offer once the bank had accepted it. All the short sale offers I've seen have been contingent upon banks approval, but that's all. However, the banks always have a multipage addendum, and since I'm not an agent, I haven't had any reason to read those in full. I'm sure somewhere in all that wall of text, it must say something about being subject to approval by a PMI company. I never would have even thought of that as a possibility.

This is why these forums are so great.

To the OP, I must say when I read your initial post, my first thought was that you had misunderstood. I've never heard of the bank approving a short sale within a day. I figured the seller had accepted it, and then the bank came back a few weeks later and rejected it. Many short sale buyers get confused by this process. But I see you were correct, and I am amazed. Despite your difficulty, I must congratulate you on the fast process.

And yes, it is very common, and very annoying, that short sale properties are listed below the price the bank will actually accept. The main reason for this is that the listing agents usually have no idea what the bank WILL accept until an offer comes in. The banks just don't make that information available.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 11:09 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,990 posts, read 49,352,281 times
Reputation: 55075
I do believe most short sales we see involve a 1st & 2nd lender who were used to avoid PMI. Until PMI was allowed to be a tax deduction most people tried to avoid and this is why so many 2nd lien lenders have gone out of business.

Seems like just in the last year or 2 has PMI come back as part of the loan equation.

There is something new to learn everyday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 01:36 PM
 
845 posts, read 2,331,114 times
Reputation: 298
If it needed to be approved by the PMI company; it seems like you didn't have a contract to begin with. You should have waited for their approval before doing the inspection. If this was a real honest business, we wouldn't be where we are today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,431 posts, read 77,376,329 times
Reputation: 45755
Quote:
Originally Posted by adolpho View Post
If it needed to be approved by the PMI company; it seems like you didn't have a contract to begin with. You should have waited for their approval before doing the inspection. If this was a real honest business, we wouldn't be where we are today.
Short sale contract is a contract between buyer and seller.
The contract is contingent upon third party acceptance.

It is certainly a contract.
Getting into a short sale is not for everyone. There is no commonly recognized path to consummation of the transaction, so risk is much higher than in typical sales.
One huge risk factor is the fact that lenders are brought into the proceedings and owe nothing to anybody involved. They have no duty to any party to respond, to act with any recognized ethical behavior, or within any legal framework that describes the process.

If one cannot hack the risk, one should avoid the short sale arena.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 08:29 AM
 
845 posts, read 2,331,114 times
Reputation: 298
It is a contract to buy something from someone, who it does not belong too.
I bought a home from WFC earlier this year and they left themselves an out in the sales contract. "Subject to upper managmenet approval." It was an REO, and we did close on time. But, it was in the contract, that they could back out and not incur any penalties. However, If I didn't close on time; it would cost me 75 per day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,431 posts, read 77,376,329 times
Reputation: 45755
Quote:
Originally Posted by adolpho View Post
It is a contract to buy something from someone, who it does not belong too.
I bought a home from WFC earlier this year and they left themselves an out in the sales contract. "Subject to upper managmenet approval." It was an REO, and we did close on time. But, it was in the contract, that they could back out and not incur any penalties. However, If I didn't close on time; it would cost me 75 per day.
You made the contract. You didn't have to.

Actually, the homeowner in the short sale very much DOES own the property. They have the deed.
The wrinkle is, they cannot convey a clear title. And the parties contract that the lien holder will approve the sale and allow clear title to pass.
It is definitely a contract.

Almost every contract has some form of unique circumstances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top