Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2012, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
5,910 posts, read 7,006,373 times
Reputation: 10356

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ncmickey View Post
You realize the road WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BUILT... for many years, without the toll?
That may have been what they said to justify the tolls, but I think it was just political posturing. There should either be tolls on the whole thing or no tolls at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2012, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Durham, NC
2,024 posts, read 5,921,874 times
Reputation: 3478
I'm with the other posters here who don't understand the frustration of Western Wakers. Those of y'all who are upset need to look back on the history.

In the late 1980s, the state created an urban loops program to build beltways. Other than I-440, which isn't really a beltway at all, and the I-277 micro-loop around downtown Charlotte, there was no such thing in North Carolina.

I-485 around Charlotte and I-540 were two of the first roads on the plan. But funds are limited when you're trying to catch up on roads infrastructure that other states had for years. It took until the early 2000s for I-485 to even be a few miles long, and for I-540 to connect I-40 and US 70 (which if you think about it, was a pretty serious need.)

It took the better part of the next few years to extend I-540 to Triangle Town Center and then Knightdale. Same with Charlotte. Meanwhile, loops are underway in Greensboro, Fayetteville and Wilmington.

What you have to remember is that **almost no one** lived in Apex, west Cary, Holly Springs, F-V, etc. back then. The priorities were the North Raleigh areas that actually had people living there. And it took nearly twenty years of tax funding to pay for that road.

Lots of folks are now moving to western Wake. And the state was happy to build out I-540 as a non-toll road... within the constraints of available funding. The projected build-out period stretched into the 2030's.

Why? NC population growth is big in the Triangle but isn't just here. The Fayetteville build-out has been driven by military growth. Roads through the Sandhills and out in eastern NC have been four-laned or built to freeway standards. (And yes, urban areas are net funders of rural roads in this state -- I don't like it, but good luck changing that.) We pay big gas taxes in NC, yes, but we also have the largest state-funded road network after Texas, courtesy of the state of NC taking over almost all secondary roads in the 1930s. In other states, the county paves your road and it comes out of your property tax. You pay for it one way or another. Cities do maintain some roads here but, frankly, NCDOT has the size and scope to do it better and cheaper, usually.

No one is forcing you to drive 540. Part of the toll road law required NCDOT to provide a free four-lane alternative. That drove widening of roads like Davis Dr. to meet the requirement.

Don't like it? Don't drive it.

And, just to give a fuller sense of where I am coming from on this:

1) My wife does in fact use the road daily from our home in downtown Durham to and from Davis/Hopson. It cuts her commute down from about 23-24 minutes to about 12-13 -- it is terrific to avoid I-40, Cornwallis, Davis and all the other backroads.

2) We live in Durham, the only city in NC to receive NO money from the urban loops fund. We are still waiting for the state to fund the East End Connector, which was first proposed in the 1950s. I don't really need to hear people moving to brand new subdivisions in Apex and Holly Springs who have four-lane highways also griping about a toll freeway when they have a free choice. We'll just be lucky to get the EEC built by the 2020s; fortunately, Toll 147/540 make the case better as it is the last link in a north-south connector from US 1 to I-85.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 07:43 AM
 
Location: My House
34,941 posts, read 36,340,224 times
Reputation: 26573
^^^Thank you. My thoughts exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Raleigh
542 posts, read 1,526,324 times
Reputation: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bull City Rising View Post
I'm with the other posters here who don't understand the frustration of Western Wakers. Those of y'all who are upset need to look back on the history.

In the late 1980s, the state created an urban loops program to build beltways. Other than I-440, which isn't really a beltway at all, and the I-277 micro-loop around downtown Charlotte, there was no such thing in North Carolina.

I-485 around Charlotte and I-540 were two of the first roads on the plan. But funds are limited when you're trying to catch up on roads infrastructure that other states had for years. It took until the early 2000s for I-485 to even be a few miles long, and for I-540 to connect I-40 and US 70 (which if you think about it, was a pretty serious need.)

It took the better part of the next few years to extend I-540 to Triangle Town Center and then Knightdale. Same with Charlotte. Meanwhile, loops are underway in Greensboro, Fayetteville and Wilmington.

What you have to remember is that **almost no one** lived in Apex, west Cary, Holly Springs, F-V, etc. back then. The priorities were the North Raleigh areas that actually had people living there. And it took nearly twenty years of tax funding to pay for that road.

Lots of folks are now moving to western Wake. And the state was happy to build out I-540 as a non-toll road... within the constraints of available funding. The projected build-out period stretched into the 2030's.

Why? NC population growth is big in the Triangle but isn't just here. The Fayetteville build-out has been driven by military growth. Roads through the Sandhills and out in eastern NC have been four-laned or built to freeway standards. (And yes, urban areas are net funders of rural roads in this state -- I don't like it, but good luck changing that.) We pay big gas taxes in NC, yes, but we also have the largest state-funded road network after Texas, courtesy of the state of NC taking over almost all secondary roads in the 1930s. In other states, the county paves your road and it comes out of your property tax. You pay for it one way or another. Cities do maintain some roads here but, frankly, NCDOT has the size and scope to do it better and cheaper, usually.

No one is forcing you to drive 540. Part of the toll road law required NCDOT to provide a free four-lane alternative. That drove widening of roads like Davis Dr. to meet the requirement.

Don't like it? Don't drive it.

And, just to give a fuller sense of where I am coming from on this:

1) My wife does in fact use the road daily from our home in downtown Durham to and from Davis/Hopson. It cuts her commute down from about 23-24 minutes to about 12-13 -- it is terrific to avoid I-40, Cornwallis, Davis and all the other backroads.

2) We live in Durham, the only city in NC to receive NO money from the urban loops fund. We are still waiting for the state to fund the East End Connector, which was first proposed in the 1950s. I don't really need to hear people moving to brand new subdivisions in Apex and Holly Springs who have four-lane highways also griping about a toll freeway when they have a free choice. We'll just be lucky to get the EEC built by the 2020s; fortunately, Toll 147/540 make the case better as it is the last link in a north-south connector from US 1 to I-85.
Such a logical and rational look at this issue in its entirety. Great post!

Michael
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 09:07 AM
 
1,067 posts, read 1,834,799 times
Reputation: 1337
The other Urban Loop in the state prior to the Highway Trust Fund urban loops program is I-240 in Asheville which was completed in 1980.

FYI construction for the Durham EEC is scheduled to begin in about 1.5 years. They're already buying up the land. That is being funded out of the Urban Loops program.

I live in West Cary and will gladly use the toll road every chance I get, becuase I hate driving and am happy to pay a bit of extra money in order to spend as little time doing it as possible. Admittedly, though, I am glad that I don't have to face the costs of using it as part of my daily commute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
1,561 posts, read 5,164,747 times
Reputation: 1167
no one forced you to live where you do, and no one is forcing you to drive on the road. first world problems...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 03:59 PM
 
4,282 posts, read 4,737,490 times
Reputation: 4104
I don't like the imposition of tolls on 540 between 55 and 54, but that's a separate issue from why there are tolls to begin with.

I agree with a previous post. The population of North Raleigh and North Wake 25 years ago was what the population of Apex/HS/F-V is today. Those of us in North Raleigh waited and waited and waited for 540 to get built. I moved here in 1986 when 540 was already on the map. It finally opened out my way in 2001. And by the way, while we waited for 540, nobody built four-lane roads for us to reach RTP. Those of you in South Wake got both a rebuilt Davis Drive and a rebuilt 55.

Apex/HS/F-V didn't want to wait until 2025 for your toll-free 540, so the state offered you a deal: build the road now, but it will be tolled. And your politicians jumped for it. So don't complain to those of us in North Raleigh about tolls. It was your choice, or technically speaking it was the choice of the people you voted for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 04:24 PM
LLN
 
Location: Upstairs closet
5,265 posts, read 10,753,796 times
Reputation: 7189
If you want to see what happens with an isolated instance of a toll road, when other routes have been used for years...visit the lonely, lonely, lonely, lonely toll road in Greenville, SC.

We took it last summer, a dozen or so mile, more or less, if I remember. We had one car pass us and one car meet us. Uhmmmm. Gonna be a long time payin for that road at that rate!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 06:01 PM
 
1,067 posts, read 1,834,799 times
Reputation: 1337
I predict that the toll road will be fairly busy at rush hour and pretty lonely at all other times of the day for its first decade of existence.

Traffic on southbound Davis and 55 can be pretty nasty now in the evening, even after the recent widenings. Southbound Davis frequently backs up clear from Morrisville Carpenter all the way to Little Drive at the peak of the evening rush. 55 backs up from Morrisville Carpenter to O'Kelly Chapel sometimes. It's hard for me to imagine that nobody will pay money to avoid that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 07:32 PM
 
149 posts, read 197,609 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by abnheel View Post
Am I the only one who:

1) Won't pay a dime for that highway?

2) Thinks they are going to lose money?

I anticipate that we will all see a WRAL report that says they are losing money. When I read that, I will laugh my butt off.

This is still a middle finger to everyone who paid taxes and they chose to toll the highway. I really hope everyone knows that and will not use that road or circumvent the whole process of photographing plates.
It's going to be a financial disaster. There may be some people trying it in the beginning but that will drop off as times goes by and they increase the fees. This just is not going to work the way they think it will. I drive over the existing toll road now and see it being used very little even in rush hour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top