Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2010, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,357,444 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

It seems that the little meeting Obama had one week ago may have brought out a few more votes from the voters in favor of health care but it sure isn't even half of them, let alone over half. Those who oppose what is now offered still outnumber those who want it by a large numbers.

Health Care Reform - Rasmussen Reports™
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2010, 01:54 PM
 
1,317 posts, read 1,402,534 times
Reputation: 286
I'll bet World Net Daily have their own polling agent too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Lubbock, Texas
331 posts, read 499,696 times
Reputation: 125
Nobody's explained this yet. Oh well, the Dems will get what they want, whether it's what their constituents voted for or not. Rush is right: this is no democracy anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 04:04 PM
 
31,384 posts, read 37,149,107 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
It seems that the little meeting Obama had one week ago may have brought out a few more votes from the voters in favor of health care but it sure isn't even half of them, let alone over half. Those who oppose what is now offered still outnumber those who want it by a large numbers.

Health Care Reform - Rasmussen Reports™
Once again, when you delve into the numbers the opposition of the current bill will not give solace to the usual coterie of conservative critics because many of those opposed to the current proffered legislation, myself included, don't think that it goes far enough, hence the rising support in Senate for the public option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 04:15 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,736,056 times
Reputation: 7943
If voters don't want health care, they can elect representatives to dismantle it. Reconciliation is going to happen and health care reform is going to pass this year.

Since health care reform is supposedly such a disaster, Republicans should be cheering on the Democrats to pass it. It should guarantee future victories for them, right? (Don't count on it.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,329,131 times
Reputation: 3827
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
If voters don't want health care, they can elect representatives to dismantle it. Reconciliation is going to happen and health care reform is going to pass this year.

Since health care reform is supposedly such a disaster, Republicans should be cheering on the Democrats to pass it. It should guarantee future victories for them, right? (Don't count on it.)
They're counting on Dems to "ram it through". The Dems aren't gonna do it because it will definitely mean bloodshed at the polls. The Dems are going to play politics just as the Reps are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 04:19 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,736,056 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
They're counting on Dems to "ram it through".
I don't see how having a majority vote constitutes "ramming it through".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 06:25 PM
 
59,500 posts, read 27,633,512 times
Reputation: 14402
"If voters don't want health care, they can elect representatives to dismantle it".

So you don't think elected representative should vote on what the people they represent want?

I though representative means to represent.

EVERY poll shows the majority of the peole do not want this bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 6,099,630 times
Reputation: 2150
The majority of voters were against the Civil Rights Act, and Women's suffrage, among other things.
It's better to give the country what it needs rather than what it wants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,329,131 times
Reputation: 3827
Quote:
Originally Posted by twista6002 View Post
The majority of voters were against the Civil Rights Act, and Women's suffrage, among other things.
It's better to give the country what it needs rather than what it wants.
Equating the two is epic fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top