Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2010, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 6,079,236 times
Reputation: 2150

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Equating the two is epic fail.
So basically health care is a privelege only for the upper middle class and up? I can take your exact view and replace it with racists in the mid 20th century regarding civil rights. And it would match verbattum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2010, 10:42 PM
 
1,062 posts, read 1,019,376 times
Reputation: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by twista6002 View Post
The majority of voters were against the Civil Rights Act, and Women's suffrage, among other things.
It's better to give the country what it needs rather than what it wants.
No, actually the majority of voters (68%) supported the Civil Rights Act.

1964 Civil Rights Act

Unless you can show that a majority of voters were against Women's Suffrage, I'll assume that's B.S. as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 11:09 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 6,079,236 times
Reputation: 2150
Quote:
Originally Posted by MainelyJersey View Post
No, actually the majority of voters (68%) supported the Civil Rights Act.

1964 Civil Rights Act

Unless you can show that a majority of voters were against Women's Suffrage, I'll assume that's B.S. as well.
And if you read the article in its entirety, it was originally hated by the majority of Americans, a la the present healthcare bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 6,079,236 times
Reputation: 2150
Quote:
Originally Posted by MainelyJersey View Post
No, actually the majority of voters (68%) supported the Civil Rights Act.

1964 Civil Rights Act

Unless you can show that a majority of voters were against Women's Suffrage, I'll assume that's B.S. as well.
And also, check out the popularity of the original Civil Rights acts, not 1964.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 11:22 PM
 
1,062 posts, read 1,019,376 times
Reputation: 402
At the time it was passed, 1964, it enjoyed majority public support. In other words, elected officials were acting in accord to the wishes of the majority of the American people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2010, 11:30 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,953,749 times
Reputation: 12828
Good legislation can stand on its own for passage. Good legislation does not increase our national debt three-fold. Good legislation does not require bribes to pass. Good legislation does not require a "simple majority" via the inappropriate use of "reconcillation" over usual Senate rules to pass.

Obama-care is NOT good legislation. It is an all out power grab to nationalize control of citizens options for healthcare treatmentby an evermore ravinous central-power based administration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2010, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,293,964 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by twista6002 View Post
So basically health care is a privelege only for the upper middle class and up? I can take your exact view and replace it with racists in the mid 20th century regarding civil rights. And it would match verbattum.
Who said it was limited only to the middle or upper class. MANY lower class families have health insurance and adequate health care. You are equating rights to use public facilities like schools and restrooms and voting booths to usage of private practices and hospitals. That is epic fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top